ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0752

Tuberculosis Screening Among New Users of a Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD: Gaps in Coverage Overall and Among JAKi Initiators

Eric Roberts1, Gabriela Schmajuk2 and Jinoos Yazdany1, 1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2UCSF / SFVA, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Infection, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Screening for latent tuberculosis (TB) is recommended prior to starting biologics or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs). With a growing number of these drugs available in rheumatology, it is important to investigate whether TB screening practices have kept pace with recommendations. Using national data, we aim to describe the proportion of new users of a b/tsDMARD who were screened for TB, and evaluate potential gaps in testing by drug type, patient characteristics and practice.

Methods: Data come from RISE, an electronic health record-based registry of US rheumatology practices with linkage to Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims. Individuals in RISE with continuous Medicare enrollment in 2017 and 2018 who were new users of a qualifying b/tsDMARD in 2018 in Medicare were included. New users were defined as those with a prescription for a b/tsDMARD in 2018 but no prescription (in Medicare or RISE) in the year prior. Use of b/tsDMARDs, information on TB testing (IGRA, TST or medical exception), and patient demographics were extracted from Medicare and RISE, to gather the most comprehensive data on b/tsDMARD use and TB testing. We calculated the proportion of patients tested in either RISE or Medicare claims in the year prior to the new b/tsDMARD, consistent with the Quality Payment Program measure. In a sensitivity analysis we permitted TB screening in the 3 years before up to 30 days after the patient’s start date. We computed screening rates by b/tsDMARD type. Using logistic regression we tested for differences in screening by age, sex, race-ethnicity, insurance and socioeconomic status (using the area deprivation index). We calculated the proportion of patients screened among practices with at least 20 new users.

Results: Among 2821 new b/tsDMARD users, mean age was 73±8.6 years, 72% female, 73% non-Hispanic White, 6.8% Black, 4.7% Hispanic and 1.2% Asian. In the year prior to drug starts, 65.2% of patients had any TB screening documented, including 61.8% with an IGRA, 4.7% with a TST, and 3.4% with a documented medical exception. In our sensitivity analysis, 77.9% had any TB screening (Table 1). Rates of screening within 1 year by drug type were greater or equal to the overall screening rate for most drugs with the exception of JAKi (53.5%) and IL17i (10.4%) (Figure 1). In a fully adjusted logistic regression, patients in the highest quartile of SES had significantly lower odds (OR=0.64; 95%CI 0.48-0.87) of being screened within 1 year compared to the lowest quartile. 50 practices had at least 20 patients; screening rates ranged from 20-96.3% of patients (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Using a comprehensive data source that includes both registry data and Medicare claims, we found that just over 1 in 3 new users of a b/tsDMARD did not receive TB screening within the recommended time window. When the screening window was expanded, performance only slightly improved with approximately 1 in 4 new users not receiving screening. Although lower TB screening rates for IL-17i may reflect greater uncertainty about TB risk with this drug mechanism, emerging evidence suggests that TB risk for JAKi is significant. Filling these gaps in care are important areas for quality improvement.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Percent of new b/tsDMARD users screened for TB within 1 year and 3 years with a 30 day grace period overall and by TB screening method.

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Proportion of new b/tsDMARD users screened for TB by DMARD type.

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Proportion of new b/tsDMARD users screened for TB by practice among practices with at least 20 patients.


Disclosures: E. Roberts: None; G. Schmajuk: None; J. Yazdany: Astra Zeneca, 2, 5, Aurinia, 5, Gilead, 5, Pfizer, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Roberts E, Schmajuk G, Yazdany J. Tuberculosis Screening Among New Users of a Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD: Gaps in Coverage Overall and Among JAKi Initiators [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tuberculosis-screening-among-new-users-of-a-biologic-or-targeted-synthetic-dmard-gaps-in-coverage-overall-and-among-jaki-initiators/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tuberculosis-screening-among-new-users-of-a-biologic-or-targeted-synthetic-dmard-gaps-in-coverage-overall-and-among-jaki-initiators/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology