ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0665

Trends in Immunomodulation/pegloticase Co-therapy from 2015-2019: A Claims Database Study

Brian LaMoreaux1, John Botson2, Megan Francis-Sedlak1, Karl Svensson1 and Robert Holt1, 1Horizon Therapeutics plc, Lake Forest, IL, 2Orthopedic Physicians Alaska, Anchorage, AK

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: gout, population studies

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pegloticase, a recombinant, PEGylated uricase enzyme, is used to treat uncontrolled gout in patients who do not improve on or are intolerant of oral urate-lowering therapies. As with other biologics, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against pegloticase can develop and cause infusion reactions and loss of treatment efficacy.1 As a result of ADA formation, the pegloticase response rate in clinical trials was 42%.2 DMARDs (e.g., azathioprine, methotrexate) are frequently used when treating autoimmune diseases with biologics to attenuate ADA development, often resulting in a more successful response to biologic therapy, and lower adverse event rates.3 Starting with a case-series presentation in late 2018, growing evidence in the literature supports using pegloticase with immunomodulation co-therapy, consistently showing a marked increase in treatment responder rates.4-8 However, little is known about whether this practice is being implemented in clinical practice and, if so, how treatment patterns have changed over time. This study examined a large medical claims database to better understand immunomodulator use with pegloticase in the United States.

Methods: The IQVIA database contains 1.3 billion claims (made from November 2014 thru December 2019) of 30 million patients diagnosed with gout or chronic kidney disease. Patients who had received pegloticase were identified and classified based on immunomodulator use. Patients who were prescribed methotrexate or azathioprine within 60 days (before or after) of receiving the first pegloticase infusion were considered to have received co-administration of pegloticase/immunomodulator.

Results: Pegloticase/immunomodulation co-therapy rates were consistently low (1.2%-3.9%) from 2015 through 2018 (Figure 1). However, this rate markedly increased to 15.0% in 2019. The majority of patients (86%) who started an immunomodulator did so within 30 days of their first pegloticase infusion. Methotrexate was more commonly used as the immunomodulator compared to azathioprine.

Conclusion: A dramatic increase in the use of immunomodulators with pegloticase was observed in 2019, most likely sparked by a case series presented in November 2018 that showed a marked improvement in treatment response rate with methotrexate/pegloticase co-therapy4,5 compared to pegloticase alone.2 Therefore, physicians appear to be using DMARDs with increasing frequency in patients with uncontrolled gout who are treated with pegloticase to potentially maximize treatment response rates. Controlled trials are currently ongoing to further validate this therapeutic approach.

References:

  1. Lipsky PE, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:R60.
  2. Sundy JS, et al. JAMA 2011;306:711-20.
  3. Krieckaert CL, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:217.
  4. Botson J, Peterson J. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70 (suppl 10).
  5. Botson J, Peterson J. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78: A1289.
  6. Albert J, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71 (suppl 10).
  7. Bessen SY, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019;49:56-61.
  8. Botson J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020, 79.

Note – Immunomodulation/pegloticase co-therapy usage defined as any patient starting either methotrexate or azathioprine within 60 days before or after their first pegloticase infusion, excluding immunotherapy usage one year before starting pegloticase.


Disclosure: B. LaMoreaux, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 2; J. Botson, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 2, 3, Radius Health, 1, Celgene, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2, Abbvie, 1, 2; M. Francis-Sedlak, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 2; K. Svensson, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 2; R. Holt, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 1, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

LaMoreaux B, Botson J, Francis-Sedlak M, Svensson K, Holt R. Trends in Immunomodulation/pegloticase Co-therapy from 2015-2019: A Claims Database Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/trends-in-immunomodulation-pegloticase-co-therapy-from-2015-2019-a-claims-database-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/trends-in-immunomodulation-pegloticase-co-therapy-from-2015-2019-a-claims-database-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology