ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1421

Treatment Responses and Their Predictors Of Abatacept In Biologic naïve Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis; Data Form Abroad Study

Yutaka Kawahito1, Takao Fujii2, Akira Yokota3, Hideo Hashimoto4, Kiyoshi Matsui5, Kenji Miki6, Masayasu Kitano5, Naoki Shinmyo7, Aihiro Yamamoto1, Koichiro Ohmura8, Takanori Kuroiwa9, Toshihiko Hidaka10, Ichiro Yoshii11, Hideko Nakahara12, Takashi Fujimoto13, Kosaku Murakami14, Satoshi Morita15, Masahiro Sekiguchi5, Norihiro Nishimoto16,17, Tsuneyo Mimori8 and Hajime Sano5, 1Department of Inflammation and Immunology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, 2Department of the Control for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 3Yokota Clinic for Rheumatology, Osaka, Japan, 4Dept of Orthopedic Surgery, Rinku Hashimoto Rheumatology Orthopaedics, Osaka, Japan, 5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya-city, Japan, 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amagasaki Central Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan, 7Kashiba Asahigaoka Hospital, Kashiba, Japan, 8Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 9Department of Rheumatology, Yukioka Hospital, Osaka, Japan, 10Zenjinkai Shimin-No-Mori Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan, 11Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yoshii Hospital, Shimanto, Japan, 12Division of Allergy, Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, NTT West Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan, 13Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan, 14Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan, 15Graduate School of Medicine & Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan, 16Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan, 17Osaka Rheumatology Clinic, Osaka, Japan

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Abatacept and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ACPA, C-reactive protein (CRP)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  The identification of predictors of good response to biologic therapy is needed in the perspective of personalized medicine. To determine the predicting factors of efficacy of abatacept (ABT) in biologic naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, we conducted the ABROAD study (Abatacept Research Outcomes as a first-line biological Agent in the real worlD) in collaboration with 46 institutions in Japan.

Methods: Patients received 500mg of ABT for patients weighted less than 60kg or 750mg for patients with more than 60kg with or without methotrexate (MTX) for 24 weeks. We measured SDAI, DAS28-CRP (DAS), CRP levels at week 0, 4, and 24 after treatment. To evaluate the response to abatacept, we used validated response definitions (50/70/ 85% improvement) for the simplified disease activity indices (SDAI), which are correlated with ACR (20/50/70 improvement) response and influenced with radiographic progression and function (Aletaha D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 71:1190-6, 2012). Predictors of good SDAI response were identified by using univariate followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.  

Results: We examined 179 RA patients with moderate and high disease activity (SDAI >11, female = 85.5 %, mean age = 62.4 years old, mean disease duration =7.9 years, mean dosage of MTX: 7.5 ± 2.6mg/week). SDAI remission (<3.3) at 24 week was achieved in 13% of our patients. SDAI 50%, 70%, and 85% improvement rate at week 24 were 71%, 39%, 16%, respectively. In univariate analyses, very high-positive ACPA (equal or more than 22 times of the ULN, ≧99 U/mL) at baseline was significantly associated with SDAI 50% improvement at week 24 (OR = 3.390, 95% CI = 1,434-8.0, p = 0.005). Short disease duration (<1 year) was significantly associated with SDAI 85% improvement (OR = 3.191, 95% CI = 1.262-8.072, p = 0.014). In multivariate analyses, very high-positive ACPA, short disease duration (<1 year), 70% improvement of CRP at week 4 were significantly associated with SDAI response. 

ACPA titer at baseline influences on SDAI response. 

1.Patients with short disease duration (<1 year)

SDAI 50% improvement (24wk)

SDAI 70% improvement (24wk)

SDAI 85% improvement (24wk)

ACPA < 4.5

25.0%

0.0%

0.0%

ACPA < 99

50.0%

12.5%

12.5%

ACPA ≧ 99

85.7%

71.4%

50.0%

2. Patients with CRP 70 % improvement (at week 4)

 

SDAI 50% improvement (24wk)

SDAI 70% improvement (24wk)

SDAI 85% improvement (24wk)

ACPA < 4.5

44.4%

33.3%

0.0%

ACPA < 99

58.6%

37.9%

13.8%

ACPA ≧ 99

95.0%

65.0%

30.0%

Conclusion: In this large biologic naïve observational cohort of RA patients treated with ABT, we suggest that very high-positive ACPA at baseline, short disease duration and CRP improvement at week 4, may be predictors for good response to ABT.


Disclosure:

Y. Kawahito,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

T. Fujii,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

A. Yokota,
None;

H. Hashimoto,
None;

K. Matsui,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

K. Miki,
None;

M. Kitano,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

N. Shinmyo,
None;

A. Yamamoto,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

K. Ohmura,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

T. Kuroiwa,
None;

T. Hidaka,
None;

I. Yoshii,
None;

H. Nakahara,
None;

T. Fujimoto,
None;

K. Murakami,
None;

S. Morita,
None;

M. Sekiguchi,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

N. Nishimoto,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

T. Mimori,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2;

H. Sano,

Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-responses-and-their-predictors-of-abatacept-in-biologic-naive-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-data-form-abroad-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology