ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2341

Treatment of Gout with Pharmacological Vs. Non-Pharmacological Complementary Therapy in the U.S.: An Internet Survey

Jasvinder A. Singh1, Nipam Shah2, N. Lawrence Edwards3 and H. Ralph Schumacher Jr.4, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2University fo Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, 4Medicine, Rheumatology, U Penn & VA Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: gout, non-pharmacologic intervention and outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The interplay of use of dietary supplement, diet modification and ULT adherence in gout management is not known.  Therefore, we aimed to begin to assess the ULT adherence and choice of non-pharmacological interventions by patients with gout, using a cross-sectional online survey.

Methods:

People visiting the Gout and Uric Acid Education Society’s website (http://gouteducation.org) were invited to participate in a brief anonymous Internet survey on a voluntary basis between 08/11/2014 to 04/14/2015.  We collected each individual’s report of their  age, gender, race, physician-diagnosed gout, receipt of physician prescription of urate-lowering medication (ULT; allopurinol or febuxostat; responses were yes/no), number of days the patient forgot to take ULT in the last month, the use of cherry extract vs. diet modification vs. ULT medication as what individuals thought might be the best life-long strategy for gout and patients’ likelihood of making a lifelong change to their diet (0=not at all likely to 10=extremely likely scale) for better gout management.

Results:

Of the 524 survey participants reporting a physician diagnosis of gout, 499 respondents were included in the final analysis (Table 1).  Mean age of survey responders was 56.3 years (standard deviation, 12.6), 50% were 41-60 years old, 74% were males, and 74% were White and 9% Asians.

57% participants responded that they were prescribed a ULT for gout, allopurinol or febuxostat. Gender, age or race were not significantly associated with the likelihood of receiving a ULT prescription.  Of those who were prescribed ULT, 251/285 (88.1%) were taking ULT, 20/285 (7%) quit taking ULT, 2/285 (0.4%) were taking ULT only when they had a gout flare and 13/285 (4.5%) did not respond to this question.  197/251 (78.5%) had ULT adherence >80% and 54/251(21.5%) had ULT adherence ≤80%.  In univariate and multivariable-adjusted analyses (Table 1), gender, race and age were not significant predictors of ULT adherence.

56% of respondents said that they preferred ULT as a lifelong treatment for gout, 24% preferred cherry extract, 16% preferred diet modification and 4% preferred none of the treatments.  In multivariable-adjusted analyses, men had significantly lower odds of preferring ULT as the lifelong treatment choice for gout vs. other therapies (p=0.03; Table 1).

54% of participants were highly motivated to make a lifelong dietary modification to improve their gout (likelihood score of 9-10; 72.7% had score of >5).  In adjusted analyses, age was significantly associated with high level of willingness to modify diet (p=0.023; Table 1).

Table 1. Multivariate-adjusted odds of the choice of ULT as gout treatment (ULT vs. others), adherence to ULT >80% and likelihood of lifelong diet change as treatment for gout by gender, race and age

Patient characteristics

ULT prescribed*

 

Choice of ULT as the treatment for gout**

 

Urate-lowering medication adherence >80%***

Likelihood of diet change with score of >8 (range, 0-10)****

Gender 

P= 0.58

P=0.03

P=0.32

P=0.41

   Male

1.13

(0.74, 1.71)

0.61

(0.39, 0.95)a

0.68

(0.31, 1.47)

0.84

(0.55, 1.28)

   Female

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Age groups

P=0.87

P=0.16

P=0.71

P=0.023

  21-40 years

1.39

(0.40, 4.71)

0.76

(0.22, 2.67)

0.81

(0.07, 9.05)

2.59

(0.51, 13.06)

  41-60 years

1.14

(0.37, 3.53)

1.02

(0.32, 3.27)

1.01

(0.11, 9.26)

2.91 (0.63,13.58)

  61-80 years

1.10

(0.34, 3.35)

0.64

(0.20, 2.08)

1.43

(0.16, 13.12)

4.76

(1.01, 22.37)a

  >80 years

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 

Race

P=0.99

P=0.60

P=0.77

P=0.48

  African American

1.10

(0.41, 2.80)

0.91

(0.45, 1.85)

0.49

(0.11, 2.24)

1.35

(0.68, 2.70)

  Hispanic or Latino

1.04

(0.33, 3.24)

0.92

(0.31, 2.77)

0.86

(0.09, 7.94)

1.13

(0.36, 3.54)

  Asian

0.78

(0.19, 3.25)

0.59

(0.31, 1.12)

2.04

(0.76, 5.47)

0.63

(0.31, 1.29)

  American Indian or Alaskan native

0.95 (0.31,2.89)

—

—

3.60

(0.31, 41.22)

  Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

—–

4.15

(0.49, 35.11)

1.19

(0.13, 11.28)

2.23

(0.58, 8.52)

  Other

0.96

(0.19, 4.83)

0.90

(0.34, 2.35)

1.60

(0.29, 8.76)

1.46

(0.56, 3.82)

  White/Caucasian

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

ap-value <0.05

—, no odds ratio calculable since no patients in this category

* Reference category is ULT was not prescribed

** Reference category is preference for non-pharmacological treatment options (cherry extract or gout-specific diet modification) for gout

*** Reference category is urate-lowering medication adherence of ≤80% in the last month

**** Reference category is the likelihood of diet change with a score ≤8 (range 0-10)

Conclusion:

Only 57% of gout patients reported having been prescribed ULT by their healthcare providers.  40% gout patients responding to the survey said that they preferred non- pharmacological interventions. Further study would be of interest to ascertain what they expected from those interventions. 


Disclosure: J. A. Singh, Takeda, Savient, 2,Takeda, Savient, merz, Regeneron, Allergan, Crealta, Bioiberica, 5; N. Shah, None; N. L. Edwards, None; H. R. Schumacher Jr., None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Singh JA, Shah N, Edwards NL, Schumacher HR Jr.. Treatment of Gout with Pharmacological Vs. Non-Pharmacological Complementary Therapy in the U.S.: An Internet Survey [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-gout-with-pharmacological-vs-non-pharmacological-complementary-therapy-in-the-u-s-an-internet-survey/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-gout-with-pharmacological-vs-non-pharmacological-complementary-therapy-in-the-u-s-an-internet-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology