ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2241

Treating to Target in Gout: The Epidemiology of Serum Urate Measurement Among Patients with Incident Gout in Usual Care Settings in the United States

Marsha Raebel1, Liza Reifler1, David Tabano1, Kristin Goddard1, Andrew Sterrett1, T Craig Cheetham2, Leslie Harrold3, Daniel Sapp4, Mark Schmidt4, Javier Nuevo5, Robert Morlock6 and Gregory Nichols4, 1Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, 2Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, 3Dept of Medicine, UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, 4Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, 5AstraZeneca, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain, 6Ardea Bioscience, San Diego, CA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: gout, laboratory tests and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III (ACR): Gout and Non-Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Conditions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: American College of
Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines recommend lowering serum urate (sUA) to a target value
in patients with gout to prevent crystal deposition/promote crystal dissolution.
At a minimum, sUA should be reduced to <6 mg/dL;
in patients with tophaceous deposits/greater disease severity, the sUA target may
be <5. sUA measurement is a necessary step in the treat to target
paradigm, but little is known about sUA measurement practices in usual care or
attainment of target sUA. The purpose of this work was to characterize sUA measurement
and sUA target attainment in patients with incident gout in usual ambulatory
care settings in the United States.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 3 geographically,
demographically, and socioeconomically diverse sites of an integrated
healthcare delivery system. The source population included adults enrolled in
the health plan 2001-2010. Patients with >=1 coded gout diagnosis were
identified; patients with >=2 years enrollment prior to first diagnosis and
with no urate-lowering medication or colchicine dispensings prior to diagnosis
were considered incident cases. The participating sites have similarly
formatted administrative, pharmacy, lab results, and electronic health records
databases that enabled collection of
demographic, clinical, medication, and
sUA data for each patient from cohort entry through 2013 or until the patient
was censored from the cohort, whichever occurred first. Descriptive statistics
were used to characterize the cohort and to examine sUA measurement and values
at baseline and over time.

Results: The cohort included 72,803 patients, mean (SD) age 60.3 (14.6);
30% female; 15% Hispanic; 57% white, 13% black, 10% Asian; 38% (n=27,780) were
prescribed urate-lowering medication after diagnosis. Across mean study
follow-up of 5.5 (3.1) years, 87% (n=63,366)
had one or more sUA assessments. The proportion of patients with sUA measured
each year after diagnosis is shown in Figure 1. The average number of sUA
measurements was 3.4 (4.4) per patient, with a mean of 1.5 (1.4) years between
measurements. Only 20% (n=12,491) of patients achieved mean sUA <6. As shown
in Figure 2, 56% (16,827 of 30,066 with >=2 sUA) of patients never had any
sUA <6.

 

 

Conclusion: Fully
80% of patients with incident gout in these usual care settings in the United
States did not achieve target mean sUA <6 mg/dL. Although most patients had at
least one sUA assessment, sUA assessment was infrequent. Given that most
patients with incident gout do not reach target sUA, more frequent sUA measurement
is urged to enable treating to target.


Disclosure: M. Raebel, AstraZeneca, 2; L. Reifler, AstraZeneca, 2; D. Tabano, AstraZeneca, 2; K. Goddard, AstraZeneca, 2; A. Sterrett, AstraZeneca, 2; T. C. Cheetham, AstraZeneca, 2; L. Harrold, AstraZeneca, 2; D. Sapp, AstraZeneca, 2; M. Schmidt, AstraZeneca, 2; J. Nuevo, AstraZeneca, 3; R. Morlock, AstraZeneca, 3; G. Nichols, AstraZeneca, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Raebel M, Reifler L, Tabano D, Goddard K, Sterrett A, Cheetham TC, Harrold L, Sapp D, Schmidt M, Nuevo J, Morlock R, Nichols G. Treating to Target in Gout: The Epidemiology of Serum Urate Measurement Among Patients with Incident Gout in Usual Care Settings in the United States [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treating-to-target-in-gout-the-epidemiology-of-serum-urate-measurement-among-patients-with-incident-gout-in-usual-care-settings-in-the-united-states/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treating-to-target-in-gout-the-epidemiology-of-serum-urate-measurement-among-patients-with-incident-gout-in-usual-care-settings-in-the-united-states/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology