ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2009

Treat-to Target for Early RA Patients in Usual Clinical Practice, a Randomized Study with a Favorable Effect of a Second Oral Pulse of Prednisolone. the Amsterdam COBRA Treat-to-target Study

Linda Hartman1, Linda Rasch2, Samina Turk3, Marieke ter Wee1, Pit Kerstens4, Conny van der Laken5, Mike Nurmohamed6, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg7, Lilian van Tuyl8, Alexandre Voskuyl1, Maarten Boers7 and Willem Lems1, 1Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, location Amsterdam UMC, VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, location Amsterdam UMC, VUmc, Amsterdam, 3Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, location Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4Westfriesgasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands, 5Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, location Amsterdam UMC, VU medical center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 6Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, location Reade and Amsterdam UMC, VU medical center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center | Reade and Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8Nivel, Utrecht, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Randomized Trial, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: RA – Treatments IV: New Therapies & Strategies (2008–2012)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 5:00PM-5:50PM

Background/Purpose: EULAR guidelines advise to start with methotrexate (MTX) for early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), either alone or combined with prednisolone. Since this strategy is not effective in all patients after 13 weeks, we performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of the addition of a second oral pulse of prednisolone versus continuation of MTX and prednisolone.

Methods: Newly diagnosed RA patients with symptom duration < 2 years were classified into a low- and high-risk group. High-risk patients either had DAS44 >3.7, or presented with at least 2 out of 3 unfavorable prognostic factors: CRP >10 mg/l; IgM RF or antiCCP with high titer; at least 1 erosion. The remaining patients were classified as low-risk. The treatment target was response (DAS44 < 1.6) or EULAR good response. Nonresponders at 13 weeks were randomized to treatment intensification or continuation, and the primary endpoint was % responders at 26 weeks.

Results: In total 189 patients were included. High-risk patients (n=150; mean age 51 years, 63% female, baseline DAS44 3.50, RF+ 75%, antiCCP+ 77%) were treated with COBRA-light (1, 2) (30 mg/day oral prednisolone, tapered in 8 weeks to 7.5 mg/day, and MTX increasing to 25 mg/week): 112 (75%) patients reached the treatment target at 13 weeks and 2 patients dropped out. On continued treatment, 92% of the responders retained the target. The 36 incomplete responders were randomized to treatment intensification with 60 mg/day prednisolone, tapered in 6 weeks to 7.5 mg/day, and addition of sulfasalazine 2000 mg/day and hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day (COBRA-plus, n=17) or continuation (n=19). After 26 weeks the treatment target was met in 14 patients (82%) of the intensified group vs 9 (47%) of the control group (difference: 35%, [95%CI 6;64]; p=0.01).

The low-risk group (n=39; mean age 56 years, 59% female, baseline DAS44 2.66, RF+ 21%, antiCCP+ 26%) was treated with MTX monotherapy increasing to 25 mg/week: only 19 (49%) reached the target at week 13 and 4 patients dropped out. On continued treatment, 95% of the responders retained the target after 26 weeks. The 16 incomplete responders were randomized to treatment intensification with a COBRA-light oral pulse of prednisolone (n=9) or continuation (n=7). After 26 weeks the treatment target was met in 5 patients (56%) of the intensified group vs 3 (43%) in the control group (difference: 13%, [95%CI –36;62]; p=0.28).

1 den Uyl D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 1071-8.
2 ter Wee M, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 1233-40.

Conclusion: With the COBRA-light strategy, 75% of RA patients with moderate to high disease activity or poor prognostic factors met the treatment target after 13 weeks. Remarkably, intensification at week 13 with added DMARDs and a second oral pulse of prednisolone even further improved the initial high response rate suggesting that patients not reaching the target at 13 weeks benefit from COBRA-plus. In the small low-risk group, only 49% met the treatment target after 13 weeks. Here, no effect of treatment intensification was found, possibly related to the small number of individuals. More treat-to-target trials are needed, particularly in patients with mild RA.


Disclosure: L. Hartman, None; L. Rasch, None; S. Turk, None; M. ter Wee, None; P. Kerstens, None; C. van der Laken, None; M. Nurmohamed, None; D. van Schaardenburg, None; L. van Tuyl, None; A. Voskuyl, None; M. Boers, None; W. Lems, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hartman L, Rasch L, Turk S, ter Wee M, Kerstens P, van der Laken C, Nurmohamed M, van Schaardenburg D, van Tuyl L, Voskuyl A, Boers M, Lems W. Treat-to Target for Early RA Patients in Usual Clinical Practice, a Randomized Study with a Favorable Effect of a Second Oral Pulse of Prednisolone. the Amsterdam COBRA Treat-to-target Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treat-to-target-for-early-ra-patients-in-usual-clinical-practice-a-randomized-study-with-a-favorable-effect-of-a-second-oral-pulse-of-prednisolone-the-amsterdam-cobra-treat-to-target-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treat-to-target-for-early-ra-patients-in-usual-clinical-practice-a-randomized-study-with-a-favorable-effect-of-a-second-oral-pulse-of-prednisolone-the-amsterdam-cobra-treat-to-target-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology