ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1600

Transcriptomic Characterization of Class II Lupus Nephritis and Outcomes

Jasmine Shwetar1, Katie Preisinger1, Devyn Zaminski2, Philip Carlucci1, Kristina Deonaraine1, Qian Xiao3, Joseph Mears4, Siddarth Gurajala3, Izmirly peter5, Judith James6, Joel Guthridge6, Andrea Fava7, Brad Rovin8, Wade DeJager6, Ming Wu9, Deepak Rao10, Chaim Putterman11, Betty Diamond12, Derek Fine13, Jose Monroy-Trujillo13, Kristin Haag14, H Michael Belmont2, William Apruzzese10, Anne Davidson12, Fernanda Payan-Schober15, Richard Furie16, Paul Hoover10, Celine Berthier17, Maria Dall'Era18, Kerry Cho19, Diane L. Kamen20, Kenneth Kalunian21, Jennifer Anolik22, Soumya Raychaudhuri10, Nir Hacohen23, Michelle Petri24, Robert Clancy25, David Wofsy18, Arnon Arazi26, Kelly Ruggles9, Jill Buyon25 and The Accelerating Medicines Partnership SLE/RA27, 1New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 2NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Michigan University, Ann Arbor, MI, 5NYU, New York, NY, 6Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 7Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 8Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 9NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 11Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 12Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 13Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 14Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 15Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, 16Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 17University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 18University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 19UCSF Health, San Francisco, CA, 20Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 21University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 22University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 23Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 24Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Timonium, MD, 25NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 26Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Melrose, MA, 27University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Bioinformatics, Disease Activity, genomics, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: Abstracts: SLE – Etiology & Pathogenesis

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Lupus Nephritis (LN) significantly reduces the survival and life expectancy of patients with SLE. Given this, considerable effort has gone into characterizing the histologic classes that confer the highest standardized mortality ratios. Although Class II LN is considered a milder form of disease which often requires less aggressive treatment, a growing body of clinical evidence suggests that these patients can progress to more advanced LN classes. Accordingly, this study leveraged the multi-center LN Accelerating Medicine Partnership (AMP) Network to focus on the transcriptome of Class II kidney biopsies with comparison to other histologic classes to provide insights into the molecular underpinnings of early disease and potential drivers of progression.

Methods: LN patients were enrolled in AMP at the time of a clinically indicated kidney biopsy and followed for one year. scRNA-seq was performed using the 10x genomics sequencing platform and quality control was performed to retain high-quality cells. Using the AMP consortium dataset which includes patients with membranous, mixed and proliferative LN, a reference-based mapping approach was employed to identify shared cell states and insights into Class II pathogenesis and outcomes.

Results: scRNA-Seq from 12 patients with Class II LN biopsies yielded 25,483 high-quality cells comprised of 11 parenchymal and three immune cell types (Fig 1). Reference mapping identified B, T and myeloid cells which are infrequently found in Class II LN by conventional microscopy (Fig 2A). In the myeloid compartment, cell type proportion analysis revealed a distinct signature with fewer monocytes and a greater number of differentiated and phagocytic macrophages in Class II compared to control and other LN classes (Fig 2B). This distinct myeloid signature was also identified in proliferative LN samples with high activity and low chronicity (activity index >= 4, chronicity index = 0). In both Class II and proliferative LN with high activity, monocytes and phagocytic macrophage subtypes were contracted and expanded relative to biopsies from healthy donors, respectively (Fig. 2C). The stromal compartment of Class II unexpectedly had a higher proportion of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts compared to all other classes (3A-B). These myofibroblasts were characterized by high expression of canonical markers, such as ACTA2 as well as markers of immune activation such as CTGF, CCL19, and CCL21 (3C). The proportion of myofibroblasts was higher in Class II patients whose UPCR fell below 0.5 and creatinine remained normal or did not exceed 125% of baseline compared to Class II patients considered non-responders at 52 weeks (3D, p = 0.048).

Conclusion: These data support that histology provides an incomplete picture of the molecular and cellular landscape in Class II LN. Increased phagocytic macrophage activity and immune-induced myofibroblast differentiation were associated with higher disease activity, highlighting these cellular composition changes as potential drivers of non-responsiveness and progression.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: UMAP representation of all cells in AMP dataset from control and membranous, proliferative, and mixed LN biopsies (left); UMAP representation generated by Symphony reference mapping of all cells from Class II LN biopsies (right).

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: (A) UMAP representation of myeloid cells in AMP (left); UMAP representation generated by Symphony reference mapping of Class II myeloid cells (right). (B) Per disease condition proportion of cells in each myeloid subcluster (control = light gray; proliferative, membranous or mixed LN = dark gray; Class II LN = red) (C) Per sample proportion of cells in various monocyte (top) and macrophage (bottom) subclusters. All comparisons of the median proportion of cells in Class II LN versus control were significant (p<0.05) using Mann-U Whitney test. When comparing Class II LN with high activity low chronicity proliferative LN, only the porportion of differentiating CD16+ Monocytes and Phagocytic macrophages were found to be significant (p = 0.033, 0.003 respectively). Control = red; Class II LN = green; High activity low chronicity proliferative LN = blue.

Supporting image 3

Figure 3: (A) UMAP representation of stromal cells in AMP dataset (left); UMAP representation generated by Symphony reference mapping of Class II stromal cells (right). (B) Proportion of fibroblast and myofibroblast cells in each disease class. P-values calculated using Mann-U Whitney test. (C) Heatmap of markers in Class II fibroblasts (red) and myofibroblasts (blue). (D) Proportion of myofibroblasts in Class II LN patients that were complete responders to treatment (CR) and non-responders to treatment (NR). P-value comparing median myofibroblast proportion using Mann-U Whitney test.


Disclosures: J. Shwetar: None; K. Preisinger: None; D. Zaminski: None; P. Carlucci: None; K. Deonaraine: None; Q. Xiao: None; J. Mears: None; S. Gurajala: None; I. peter: None; J. James: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Novartis, 2, Progentec Biosciences, 5; J. Guthridge: None; A. Fava: Annexon Biosciences, 2, Sanofi, 1; B. Rovin: AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Aurinia, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, 2, Genentech, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Novartis, 2; W. DeJager: None; M. Wu: None; D. Rao: AstraZeneca, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Hifibio, 2, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, Scipher Medicine, 2; C. Putterman: Equillium, 2, KidneyCure, 1, Progentec, 2; B. Diamond: Alpine, 12, DSMB, DBV, 2, 2, IMT, 2, Kyverna, 2, Nighthawk, 2, ONO, 2; D. Fine: None; J. Monroy-Trujillo: None; K. Haag: None; H. Belmont: Alexion, 6, Aurinia, 6; W. Apruzzese: None; A. Davidson: None; F. Payan-Schober: None; R. Furie: Biogen, 2, 5; P. Hoover: None; C. Berthier: None; M. Dall'Era: Annexon Biosciences, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Biogen, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2; K. Cho: None; D. Kamen: None; K. Kalunian: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Eli Lilly, 2, EquilliumBio, 2, Genentech, 2, Gilead, 2, Janssen, 2, KezarBio, 1, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Remegene, 2, Roche, 2, UCB, 5; J. Anolik: None; S. Raychaudhuri: AbbVie, 6, Janssen, 1, Mestag, Inc, 2, 8, Pfizer, 1, Sanofi, 1, Sonoma, 1, 8; N. Hacohen: None; M. Petri: Alexion, 1, Amgen, 1, AnaptysBio, 1, Annexon Bio, 1, Argenx, 1, Arhros-Focus Med/Ed, 6, AstraZeneca, 1, 5, Aurinia, 1, 5, 6, Axdev, 1, Biogen, 1, Boxer Capital, 2, Cabaletto Bio, 2, Caribou Biosciences, 2, CVS Health, 1, Eli Lilly, 1, 5, Emergent Biosolutions, 1, Exagen, 5, Exo Therapeutics, 2, Gilead Biosciences, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 5, 6, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, 2, IQVIA, 1, Janssen, 1, 5, Kira Pharmaceuticals, 2, MedShr, 6, Merck/EMD Serono, 1, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, 2, Nexstone Immunology, 2, Nimbus Lakshmi, 2, Proviant, 2, Sanofi, 2, Sinomab Biosciences, 2, Thermofisher, 5, UCB, 2; R. Clancy: None; D. Wofsy: Amgen, 7, Novartis, 7; A. Arazi: None; K. Ruggles: None; J. Buyon: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Related Sciences, 1; T. SLE/RA: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shwetar J, Preisinger K, Zaminski D, Carlucci P, Deonaraine K, Xiao Q, Mears J, Gurajala S, peter I, James J, Guthridge J, Fava A, Rovin B, DeJager W, Wu M, Rao D, Putterman C, Diamond B, Fine D, Monroy-Trujillo J, Haag K, Belmont H, Apruzzese W, Davidson A, Payan-Schober F, Furie R, Hoover P, Berthier C, Dall'Era M, Cho K, Kamen D, Kalunian K, Anolik J, Raychaudhuri S, Hacohen N, Petri M, Clancy R, Wofsy D, Arazi A, Ruggles K, Buyon J, SLE/RA T. Transcriptomic Characterization of Class II Lupus Nephritis and Outcomes [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/transcriptomic-characterization-of-class-ii-lupus-nephritis-and-outcomes/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/transcriptomic-characterization-of-class-ii-lupus-nephritis-and-outcomes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology