ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0178

Traditional and Lupus-Specific Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Events Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Saloni Patolia, Dulaney Wilson, Jim Oates and Diane L. Kamen, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Heart disease, race/ethnicity, Stroke, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0176–0195) Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster I: Lupus

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Even among young women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), accelerated atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease are common complications. Traditional risk scoring methods underestimate cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with SLE, highlighting the need to account for both traditional and lupus-specific risk factors. Our goal is to evaluate the influence of traditional and lupus-specific risk factors on CV outcomes, and examine potential health disparities in these outcomes, among patients with SLE.

Methods: Data was obtained from an ongoing IRB-approved longitudinal single-center registry of patients with SLE and non-SLE population-matched controls. Demographics, medical / social history, and SLE characteristics (if applicable) was obtained from interviews, exams, and medical record review. Disease damage was determined by SLICC/ACR Damage Index (“any damage” if score ≥1).Descriptive analyses, Pearson’s chi-squared testing, two-sample t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression were performed as appropriate.

Results: 854 patients with SLE and 663 non-SLE population-matched controls were included in our study. Compared to the controls, the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) was higher among SLE patients (OR 10.53, p< 0.01) and risk of stroke was higher among SLE patients (OR 18.55, p< 0.01), adjusted for age, race, and gender.

Age of SLE diagnosis and current age were both lower among Black patients compared to non-Black patients (Table 1), with no significant difference in disease duration. Significantly higher rates of hypertension, lupus nephritis (LN), disease damage and steroid use were observed among Black patients, and a higher rate of smoking was observed among non-Black patients. Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were associated with higher risk of stroke and MI in univariate analysis (each p < 0.01). In a multivariate model of the risk among patients with SLE of either a stroke or MI, highest odds were for hypertension (OR 5.24, p< 0.01), adjusted for age, race, gender, education, smoking, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, steroid use, and nephritis.

In multivariate regression models those with childhood onset SLE had a similar mean length of time between SLE onset to stroke compared to adult onset SLE (Figure 1), but the stroke age was younger for childhood-onset SLE (23.3 ±10.5 vs 43.3 ±13.8, p< 0.01). Age of MI was also younger for childhood-onset SLE (22.1 ±7.5 vs 47.1 ±11.2, p=0.01). Those with LN had a younger stroke age (32.5 ±14.6 vs 45.0 ±13.5, p< 0.01) and a shorter time to initial stroke compared to those without LN (Figure 2).

Conclusion: We found an increased prevalence of CV indicators and CV outcomes among patients with SLE at a significantly younger age compared to population controls, which is even more striking among patients with childhood onset SLE. Continued racial disparities in several important lupus and CV outcomes were evident, highlighting the need to identify and address care gaps for these high-risk patients. Continued progress in understanding what underlies these outcomes will support needed well-informed clinical interventions in risk factor modification for patients with SLE.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Characteristics of study participants comparing Black and non-Black patients with SLE

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Percent event-free survival over time (in years) from SLE diagnosis to initial stroke comparing adult onset to childhood onset SLE

Supporting image 3

Figure 2: Percent event-free survival over time (in years) from SLE diagnosis to initial stroke comparing lupus nephritis patients to those without lupus nephritis


Disclosures: S. Patolia: None; D. Wilson: None; J. Oates: None; D. Kamen: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Patolia S, Wilson D, Oates J, Kamen D. Traditional and Lupus-Specific Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Events Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/traditional-and-lupus-specific-risk-factors-for-cardiovascular-events-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/traditional-and-lupus-specific-risk-factors-for-cardiovascular-events-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology