ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0600

Toward a Consensus-Based Definition of Difficult-to-Treat Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Multinational Survey of Clinicians from the MENA Region

Ahlam Almarzooqi1, Sarah Al Qassimi2, Nelly Ziade3, Mohammed Omair4, Samar Al emadi5, FARIDA ALBALUSHI6, Waleed Hafiz7, Hiba Khogali8, Saadeya Naji9, Suzan Attar10, Khalid Alnaqbi11 and Rajaie Namas12, 1Emirates Health Services, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 2Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 3Department of Rheumatology, Saint-Joseph University and Hotel-Dieu de France, Beirut, Lebanon, 4King Saud university, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 5Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar, 6Royal hospital, Dubia, United Arab Emirates, 7Umm Al-Qura university, Makkah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, 8Madinat Zayed Hospital , Al Dhafra hospitals, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 9Salmaniya medical complex, BAHRAIN, Al Asimah, Bahrain, 10King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 11Sheikh Tahnoon Medical city, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, 12Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Detroit, MI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: antiphospholipid syndrome, autoimmune diseases, Surveys, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0593–0640) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Difficult-to-treat systemic lupus erythematosus (D2T-SLE) presents a major challenge due to disease heterogeneity and a lack of unified classification. While the D2T concept has advanced management in other autoimmune diseases, no operational definition exists for SLE. This study aimed to define clinician-endorsed criteria for D2T-SLE across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to rheumatologists and nephrologists in 12 MENA countries. Clinicians rated factors relevant to D2T-SLE, including disease persistence, treatment failure, corticosteroid use, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), overlapping syndromes, and psychosocial factors. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, k-means clustering, logistic regression, and Cohen’s Kappa for agreement.

Results: A total of 141 clinicians responded (89% rheumatologists). Most participants had experience in academic lupus settings, with 68% involved in research or publication and 50% in international SLE workshops. There was broad support for incorporating both clinical and PRO elements (93%), organ-specific involvement (88%), and corticosteroid dependency (82%) into a D2T-SLE definition. Top criteria included persistent moderate-to-high disease activity, failure of multiple therapies, and recurrent flares. Overlapping autoimmune syndromes—particularly APS, MAS, and Sjögren’s—were identified as major complicating factors, with 62% supporting their inclusion in D2T-SLE criteria. The agreement on corticosteroid thresholds was low (κ = -0.009).Factor analysis identified two latent domains: psychosocial burden (fatigue, psychological distress) and functional burden (pain, QOL, and activity limitation). Cluster analysis revealed three clinician phenotypes: one prioritizing PROs, another emphasizing clinical damage, and a balanced group. Logistic regression showed that fatigue (p = 0.015), pain (p < 0.001), and functional impairment (p = 0.027) significantly predicted prioritization of QOL. Clinicians favored including kidney and CNS involvement in the definition, based on persistent SLEDAI-2K ≥6, BILAG A/B scores, and frequent flares.Commonly cited causes of treatment failure included primary inefficacy, secondary loss of response, toxicity, comorbidities, and non-adherence.

Conclusion: Clinicians across the MENA region strongly supported defining D2T-SLE using a composite of treatment failure, corticosteroid burden, PROs, and organ involvement. These findings align with the broader D2T paradigm seen in other autoimmune diseases and advocate for a multidimensional, consensus-based framework. This study provides the quantitative foundation for future international classification efforts.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Summary of Key Findings from the D2T-SLE Clinician Survey


Disclosures: A. Almarzooqi: None; S. Al Qassimi: None; N. Ziade: None; M. Omair: None; S. Al emadi: None; F. ALBALUSHI: None; W. Hafiz: None; H. Khogali: None; S. Naji: None; S. Attar: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 5, 6, Amgen, 1, 5, 6, AstraZeneca, 1, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 5, 6, Gilead, 1, 5, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 5, 6, Hikma, 1, 5, 6, Janssen, 1, 5, 6, Novartis, 1, 5, 6, Organon, 1, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 5, 6, Roche, 1, 5, 6, Sandoz, 1, 5, 6, Sanofi, 1, 5, 6, Takeda, 1, 5, 6; K. Alnaqbi: None; R. Namas: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Almarzooqi A, Al Qassimi S, Ziade N, Omair M, Al emadi S, ALBALUSHI F, Hafiz W, Khogali H, Naji S, Attar S, Alnaqbi K, Namas R. Toward a Consensus-Based Definition of Difficult-to-Treat Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Multinational Survey of Clinicians from the MENA Region [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/toward-a-consensus-based-definition-of-difficult-to-treat-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-multinational-survey-of-clinicians-from-the-mena-region/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/toward-a-consensus-based-definition-of-difficult-to-treat-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-multinational-survey-of-clinicians-from-the-mena-region/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology