ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2121

Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes In Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis, Osteoarthritis With Cutaneous Psoriasis, and Osteoarthritis

Lisa A. Mandl1, Rebecca Zhu2, Wei-Ti Huang3, Michael Alexiades4, Mark P. Figgie5 and Susan M. Goodman1, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Clinical Research, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 5Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis and total joint replacement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Outcomes of total hip replacements (THR) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are poorly studied.  Previous studies are conflicting, often not separating inflammatory PsA from osteoarthritis (OA) with cutaneous psoriasis (PsC). This study evaluates THR outcomes in PsA compared to both PsC+OA and OA alone.

Methods: This study utilized cases from a high volume single institution THR registry enrolled between 5/2007 and 12/2011. Potential PsA cases were identified by ICD-9 code (696.0-.1) and matched 4:1 (on age, primary vs. revision and date of surgery) with OA THR.  THR with other rheumatic disease or fractures were excluded. Patient reported outcomes were collected at baseline and 2 years; non-responders received an additional questionnaire at 3-5 years.  Differences between groups were compared using ANOVA, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify independent predictors of poor post-op pain and function, (WOMAC < 60). This study was IRB approved.

Results: 289 potential PsA were identified; 69 PsA and 167 PsC+OA were validated by chart review.  Post-op self-report data were available in 64% PsA, 63% PsC+OA and 83% OA.  4% of self-reported outcomes were elicited 3-5 years post-op.  There was no difference in race, age or education between groups.  PsA and PsC+OA had more co-morbidities (0 Deyo co-morbidities: PsA 61% vs. PsC+OA 68% vs. OA 80%; p-value=0.004) and worse ASA class.  More PsA and PsC+OA were current or previous smokers. 87% of PsA were on biologics or non-biologic DMARDs compared to 7% of PsC+OA. There was no statistically significant difference in pre-or post-op WOMAC pain or function or SF-12 PCS scores between groups. SF-12 MCS scores were higher in OA both pre-and post-operatively (p-values=0.003 and <0.001 respectively). EQ-5D scores were worse both pre- and post-operatively in PsA and PsC+OA (p-value=0.006 and p-value<0.001). Overall satisfaction with THA was equally high for all groups, with > 80% being very satisfied (p-value=0.82).  In multivariate logistic regressions, (Table 2), a diagnosis of PsA or PsC+OA did not statistically significantly increase the odds of either poor post-op pain or function.  Revision THR had much higher odds of poor post-op pain, and worse pre-op pain and function were statistically associated with poor post-op pain and function, respectively. Current smoking has >3x increased odds of poor post-op pain and function.

Conclusion: Despite worse pre-operative health status, PsA or PsC+OA were not independent risk factors for poor THR outcomes.  These results should be communicated to PsA and PsC+OA patients contemplating THR.

 

Table 1: Demographic Data

PsA (N=69)

PsC+OA (N=167)

OA (N=771*)

P-Value

Male, n (%)

36 (52%)

92 (55%)

343 (45%)

0.035

Age, years (SD)

60.6 (11.2)

63.6 (11.9)

63.2 (11.0)

0.14

BMI (SD)

29.6 (5.1)

29.3 (6.5)

27.6 (5.2)

<0.001

Caucasian, n (%)

43 (93%)

93 (98%)

715 (94%)

0.26

Pre-operative SF-12 MCS (SD)

47.9 (13.8)

46.9 (12.9)

51.2 (12.3)

0.003

Post-op  SF-12 MCS (SD)

50.8 (10.9)

49.4 (11.6)

53.5 (9.5)

<0.001

Pre-operative EQ-5D (SD)

0.6 (0.2)

0.6 (0.2)

0.7 (0.2)

0.006

Post-op  EQ-5D (SD)

0.6 (0.3)

0.7 (0.2)

0.8 (0.2)

<0.001

ASA Class, n (%)

 

 

 

<0.001

Class 1

0 (0%)

12 (7%)

70 (9%)

 

Class 2

47 (68%)

116 (69%)

590 (77%)

 

Class 3

22 (32%)

36 (22%)

110 (14%)

 

Class 4

0 (0%)

3 (2%)

1 (0%)

 

≥College Education, n (%)

27 (75%)

48 (72%)

559 (74%)

0.91

Pre-op WOMAC Pain (SD)

52.9 (17.0)

55.6 (17.4)

54.6 (18.6)

0.74

Post-op WOMAC Pain (SD)

84.5 (20.2)

84.6 (20.3)

83.7 (22.6)

0.92

Pre-op WOMAC Function (SD)

49.3 (17.2)

50.7 (18.8)

51.1 (19.1)

0.85

Post-op WOMAC Function (SD)

83.0 (19.9)

81.0 (21.8)

80.5 (23.7)

0.82

Do you currently smoke?

 

 

 

0.005

Yes

4 (9%)

2 (2%)

29 (4%)

 

No, but I smoked previously

26 (60%)

58 (61%)

345 (46%)

 

Never

13 (30%)

35 (37%)

371 (50%)

 

*771/931 OA control data were available for analysis

 

Table 2: Predictors of Having Poor Post-Operative Pain or Function (WOMAC <60) After THR*

 

Poor Post-Operative Pain

WOMAC (<60)

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Poor Post-Operative Function WOMAC (<60)

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

PsC+OA vs. OA

1.00 (0.46, 2.19)

1.01 (0.49, 2.08)

PsA vs OA

0.83 (0.28, 2.43)

0.83 (0.29, 2.38)

Primary vs. Revision

0.40 (0.19, 0.84)

0.73 (0.35, 1.56)

Current Smoker vs Never Smoked

3.44 (1.40, 8.49)

3.60 (1.47, 8.82)

Past Smoker vs Never Smoked

1.02 (0.67, 1.55)

1.32 (0.89, 1.98)

Pre-operative WOMAC Pain

0.95 (0.93, 0.97)

1.01 (0.99, 1.03)

Pre-operative WOMAC Function

1.00 (0.98, 1.02)

0.95 (0.93, 0.97)

*Multivariate regression controlling for gender, diagnosis, BMI, ASA class, number of comorbidities, primary vs revision surgery, smoker status, pre-operative WOMAC pain and function, pre-operative MCS, Pre-operative EQ Score.


Disclosure:

L. A. Mandl,
None;

R. Zhu,
None;

W. T. Huang,
None;

M. Alexiades,
None;

M. P. Figgie,

Mekanika,

1,

Ethicon,

2;

S. M. Goodman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/total-hip-arthroplasty-outcomes-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-osteoarthritis-with-cutaneous-psoriasis-and-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology