ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Abstract Number: 2876

Torque Teno Virus Quantification for Functional Monitoring of Immunomodulation with Biological Compounds in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Paul Studenic1, Gregor Bond2, Andreas Kerschbaumer3, Manuel Bécède3, Karel Pavelka4, Dmitry Karateev5, Jutta Stieger6, Rudolf Puchner7, Ruediger Mueller8, Elisabeth Puchhammer-Stöckl9, Martina Durechova10, Michaela Loiskandl10, Thomas Perkmann11, Marta Olejarova4, Elena Luchikhina12, Carl-Walter Steiner13, Michael Bonelli10, Josef S. Smolen14 and Daniel Aletaha10, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Internal Medicine 3, Division of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 4Department of Experimental Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Rheumatology, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, 5Department of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI), Moscow, Russian Federation, 62nd Deparment of Medicine, 2nd Deparment of Medicine, Hitzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria, 7Private Office, Wels, Austria, 8Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Rehabilitation, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 9Institute for Virology, Institute for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 10Department of Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 11Department of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 12Department of rheumatology, Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI), Moscow, Russian Federation, 13Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 14Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Keywords: Biologic agents, outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and viruses

Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T109 ACR Abstract: RA–Treatments V: Beyond Individual Compounds (2874–2879)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who fail to respond to methotrexate (MTX) can be subjected to an addition of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD). Currently there are 4 modes of action of bDMARDs: inhibitors of tumor-necrosis-factor alpha (TNFi), of interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6), lymphocyte co-stimulation (anti-CTLA4) and B-cell directed therapy (anti-CD20). All bDMARDs show similar response rates at 6 months treatment, while differences in response between patients may relate to variable level of immunomodulation by each drug.

The apathogenic and highly prevalent Torque Teno Virus (TTV) is a potential novel candidate for functional monitoring of immune response. TTV in peripheral blood has been shown to mirror the immunocompetence of its host in patients with HIV, malignancies and solid organ transplantation.

Here we explore levels of TTV replication in patients receiving bDMARDs, and their association with clinical response to therapy.

Methods: The BIOBIO Study is a multicenter randomized open-label trial, including RA patients with insufficient response to MTX. Patients were randomized to either TNFi (infliximab, INF); anti-IL-6 (tocilizumab, TCZ); CTLA4-Ig (abatacept, ABA) or anti-CD20 (rituximab, RTX) in addition to MTX. Serum samples were collected at baseline and 3 months. RT-PCR was used to quantify TTV within these serum samples.

Results: TTV was measured in 95 RA patients randomized to INF (n=23), TCZ (n=22), ABA (n=27) or RTX (n=23); 77% were female, 72% were ACPA and 51% RF positive and 2/3 showed high disease activity. Median TTV at baseline was 4.3*10^4 c/ml (IQR: 7.4*10^3, 1.3*10^5) with no difference between the 4 treatment groups. After 3 months of treatment patients showed increase in TTV levels compared to baseline (INF: p=0.018; ABA: p=0.071; RTX: p≤0.001). There was no change in TTV for TCZ, and therefore omitted from further analyses on the association between TTV and treatment response.

TTV at 3 months after treatment was higher in patients achieving a SDAI85 response at month 6 (p=0.007; Figure 1A). Receiver operating characteristics outlined an area under the curve of 0.756 for prediction of SDAI85 at month 6 after treatment by TTV at month 3 (p<=0.001). A TTV level of 5.6×10^5c/ml at month 3 shows a 67% specificity, 81% sensitivity, relating to a +likelihood ratio of 2.6 (95%CI: 1.6-4.1) for SDAI85 prediction at month 6. Patients in the top tertiles of month 3 TTV had greater changes in SDAI (p=0.043), CDAI (p=0.022) and DAS28 (p=0.022) and higher SDAI85 response rates at month 6 (OR=5.85, CI: 1.4-24.5; p=0.016; Figure 1B. No patient below a TTV value of 2.7*10^4c/ml showed SDAI85 treatment response.

 

Conclusion:  Our data suggest that TTV level in the peripheral blood corresponds to and predicts clinical response to bDMARDs for RA, except for TCZ. Future prospective trials have to clarify the potential of TTV tailored bDMARD dosing.


Disclosure: P. Studenic, None; G. Bond, None; A. Kerschbaumer, None; M. Bécède, None; K. Pavelka, None; D. Karateev, None; J. Stieger, None; R. Puchner, None; R. Mueller, None; E. Puchhammer-Stöckl, None; M. Durechova, None; M. Loiskandl, None; T. Perkmann, None; M. Olejarova, None; E. Luchikhina, None; C. W. Steiner, None; M. Bonelli, None; J. S. Smolen, None; D. Aletaha, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Studenic P, Bond G, Kerschbaumer A, Bécède M, Pavelka K, Karateev D, Stieger J, Puchner R, Mueller R, Puchhammer-Stöckl E, Durechova M, Loiskandl M, Perkmann T, Olejarova M, Luchikhina E, Steiner CW, Bonelli M, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Torque Teno Virus Quantification for Functional Monitoring of Immunomodulation with Biological Compounds in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/torque-teno-virus-quantification-for-functional-monitoring-of-immunomodulation-with-biological-compounds-in-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/torque-teno-virus-quantification-for-functional-monitoring-of-immunomodulation-with-biological-compounds-in-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology