ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 441

Tofacitinib, An Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor: Safety Comparison In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and An Inadequate Response To Nonbiologic Or Biologic Disease‑Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

G. R. Burmester1, C Charles-Schoeman2, J. D. Isaacs3, T. Hendrikx4, K. Kwok5, S. H. Zwillich6 and R. Riese6, 1Department of Medicine/Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology and German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin (DRFZ), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 3Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom, 4Pfizer BV, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands, 5Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 6Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, randomized trials, rheumatoid arthritis, safety and tofacitnib, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is a novel, oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This analysis provides comparative safety data on the incidence of safety events for patients (pts) with an inadequate response (IR) to a nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD-IR) versus pts with an IR to a biologic DMARD (bDMARD-IR). These data were presented previously.1

Methods: The primary comparison was performed on pooled data from 5 randomized, controlled Phase 3 (P3) studies in RA pts treated with tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg BID for 6 to 12 months. Supportive analyses were conducted on 2 pooled open-label long-term extension (LTE) studies. All pts enrolled were nonbiologic or biologic DMARD-IR.

Results: In the pooled P3 studies, 2389 tofacitinib-treated pts with 1783 pt-years (pt‑yrs) of exposure were analyzed in the DMARD-IR population and 641 pts with 315 pt-yrs of exposure in the bDMARD-IR group. Baseline demographics were generally similar, albeit the bDMARD-IR group was generally older, heavier and had fewer Asian pts. Compared with the DMARD-IR, the bDMARD-IR population exhibited increases in the rate (events/100 pt-yrs) of serious adverse events (SAEs) (12.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.0, 16.9] vs 9.9 [8.6, 11.5]) and discontinuations due to adverse events (AE DC) (15.0 [95% CI 11.3, 20.0] vs 9.6 [7.7, 12.1]) in both tofacitinib treatment arms and in placebo. There were four adalimumab pts (and 0 events) that were bDMARD-IR. The rates of deaths, serious infections (SI), malignancies and major adverse cardiovascular events were similar across the populations (Table). LTE studies included 2715 pts with 3588 pt-yrs of exposure in the DMARD-IR population and 566 pts with 514 pt-yrs of exposure in the bDMARD‑IR group. As compared with the DMARD-IR, the bDMARD-IR population showed increases in rates (events/100 pt-yrs) of SAEs (14.6 [95% CI 11.6, 18.4] vs 10.2 [9.2, 11.3]), AE DC (10.0 [95% CI 7.6, 13.1] vs 6.8 [6.0, 7.7]) and SIs (4.7 [95% CI 3.1, 7.0] vs 2.7 [2.2, 3.3]). The rates of the other safety events were similar.

Conclusion: Event rates for important safety events for both DMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR pts are within the ranges observed with biologic therapies approved for treatment of RA with some differences noted in SI (LTE only), SAE and AE DC favoring the DMARD-IR population.

Reference:   1. Burmester G et al.  Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 245-245.

Table  Incidence Rates (Events/100 Pt-Yrs) for Safety Events in DMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR Populations in the Pooled Phase 3 Studies

 

DMARD-IR

Incidence Rate (95% CI) [number of pts with event]

bDMARD-IR

Incidence Rate (95% CI) [number of pts with event]

Parameter

Tofacitinib

Placebo

n=500

Adalimumab

n=200

Tofacitinib

Placebo

n=181

5 mg BID

n=969

10 mg BID

n=973

All*

n=2389

5 mg BID

n=247

10 mg BID

n=241

All*

n=641

Mortality (deaths within 30 days of last dose)

0.52 (0.20, 1.40) [4]

0.51 (0.19, 1.37) [4]

0.45 (0.22, 0.90) [8]

0.63 (0.09, 4.44) [1]

0.57 (0.08, 4.04) [1]

0.71 (0.10, 5.05) [1]

0

0.64 (0.16, 2.54) [2]

0

Serious Infections

3.29 (2.22, 4.86) [25]

3.08 (2.07, 4.60) [24]

2.92 (2.23, 3.84) [52]

1.88 (0.61, 5.82) [3]

1.71 (0.55, 5.31) [3]

2.85 (1.07, 7.58) [4]

2.30 (0.74, 7.13) [3]

2.86 (1.49, 5.49) [9]

0

Malignancies (excl. NMSC†)

0.52 (0.20, 1.40) [4]

0.77 (0.35, 1.71) [6]

0.56 (0.30, 1.04) [10]

0

0.57 (0.08, 4.05) [1]

0.71 (0.10, 5.05) [1]

1.53 (0.38, 6.13) [2]

0.95 (0.31, 2.95) [3]

0

Composite MACEΨ (adjudicated)

0.39 (0.13, 1.22) [3]

0.64 (0.27, 1.54) [5]

0.45 (0.22, 0.90) [8]

1.25 (0.31, 5.00) [2]

1.71 (0.55, 5.30) [3]

0.71 (0.10, 5.06) [1]

0.77 (0.11, 5.45) [1]

1.27 (0.48, 3.39) [4]

0

*Tofacitinib All group comprises pts randomized to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID at study start plus placebo pts advanced to tofacitinib treatment per protocol design. Placebo pts advanced to tofacitinib are counted in placebo until advancement and in the “Tofacitinib All” group after advancement. †NMSC, nonmelanoma skin cancer. ΨMACE, major adverse cardiovascular events. All data as of 29 Sep 2011


Disclosure:

G. R. Burmester,

Abbott, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

2,

Abbott, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

5,

Abbott, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

8;

C. Charles-Schoeman,

Pfizer Inc,

2;

J. D. Isaacs,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

8;

T. Hendrikx,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

K. Kwok,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

S. H. Zwillich,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

R. Riese,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tofacitinib-an-oral-janus-kinase-inhibitor-safety-comparison-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-an-inadequate-response-to-nonbiologic-or-biologic-disease%e2%80%91modifying-anti-rheumatic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology