ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1845

Tocilizumab Combination Therapy or Monotherapy or Methotrexate Monotherapy in Methotrexate-Naive Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Gerd Burmester1, William Rigby2, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven3, Jonathan Kay4, Andrea Rubbert-Roth5, Ricardo Blanco6, Ariella Kelman7, Sophie Dimonaco8 and Nina Mitchell8, 1Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, 3Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 4UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, 5University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 6Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain, 7Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, 8Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, treatment and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy III: Innovative Therapeutic Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Treatment with tocilizumab (TCZ) in combination with MTX or as monotherapy (Mono) in MTX-naive patients (pts) with early RA resulted in improved signs and symptoms and inhibition of joint damage at wk 52 of the 104-wk, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial FUNCTION.1 Results to wk 104 are presented.

Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1:1 to TCZ 8 mg/kg (TCZ8) + MTX, TCZ8 Mono, TCZ 4 mg/kg (TCZ4) + MTX, or MTX for 104 wks. Pts received IV TCZ q4w, with MTX escalated from 7.5 mg qw to 20 mg qw by wk 8. Inclusion criteria have been described.1 At wk 52, TCZ4 + MTX and MTX pts who had not achieved low disease activity (DAS28 ≤3.2) switched to blinded escape therapy with TCZ8 + MTX. Efficacy end points (DAS28, ACR responses, and van der Heijde–modified Total Sharp Score) were assessed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, and a subgroup analysis was performed for postescape data. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated under the treatment group in which the AE occurred. Wk 104 analyses were exploratory; no statistical testing was performed.

Results: At wk 52, 95/290 (33%) TCZ4 + MTX pts and 142/289 (49%) MTX pts switched to TCZ8 + MTX escape therapy. Baseline characteristics of escape pts were consistent with those of the full ITT population.1 Clinical efficacy was maintained through wk 104 in the TCZ8 groups, with similar proportions at wks 52 and 104 achieving ACR20/50/70 responses and DAS28, ACR/EULAR Boolean/Index, and Clinical Disease Activity Index criteria remission. Inhibition/slowing of radiographic progression was also maintained. In TCZ4 + MTX and MTX pts who switched to escape with TCZ8 + MTX at wk 52, further improvement in efficacy from the point of escape was generally seen at wk 104. Despite the inhibition of structural joint damage after escape, joint damage was numerically greater than in pts who received TCZ8 Mono or TCZ8 + MTX throughout (Table). TCZ serum levels were similar with both Mono and combination TCZ treatment. AE rates were similar across groups, with serious AE and serious infection rates numerically higher in the TCZ groups (Table). There were 14 deaths (9 reported earlier1); 5 occurred in year 2. Underlying causes varied and included 4 due to infection (2 MTX; 2 TCZ4 + MTX), 3 due to malignancy (1 TCZ8 + MTX; 2 TCZ8 Mono), and 2 due to cardiovascular disease (1 TCZ4 + MTX; 1 TCZ8 Mono).

Conclusion: Pts with early RA who received TCZ8 + MTX or TCZ8 Mono for the duration of the study had sustained improvement in disease activity and maintained joint damage inhibition over 104 wks. Efficacy improved further in pts receiving MTX or TCZ4 + MTX who switched to escape with TCZ8 + MTX at wk 52; the overall degree of joint damage (though generally minor) was greater than that in pts who received TCZ8 for the entire study, highlighting the importance of early initiation of optimal therapy. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile of TCZ.

Reference: 1. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2013;65:S1182.

    

 


Disclosure:

G. Burmester,

AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB, Roche,

2,

AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Merck, MedImmune, UCB, Roche,

5,

AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Merck, UCB, Roche,

8;

W. Rigby,
None;

R. F. van Vollenhoven,

AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

2,

AbbVie, Biotest, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Vertex,

5;

J. Kay,

AbbVie Inc., Ardea Biosciences, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, and Roche Laboratories, Inc.,

2,

AbbVie Inc., Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Crescendo BioScience Inc., Epirus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Genentech Inc., Hospira, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Inc., PanGenetics, B.V., Pfizer Inc., Roche Laboratories, Inc., and UCB, Inc.,

5;

A. Rubbert-Roth,

Chugai, Roche, Pfizer,

2,

Abbott, Chugai, BMS, Roche, UCB, Pfizer, MSD,

5;

R. Blanco,

Abbott, MSD, Roche,

2,

Abbott, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, Janssen, MSD,

8;

A. Kelman,

Roche ,

1,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

3;

S. Dimonaco,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

3;

N. Mitchell,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

1,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tocilizumab-combination-therapy-or-monotherapy-or-methotrexate-monotherapy-in-methotrexate-naive-patients-with-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-2-year-clinical-and-radiographic-results-from-a-randomized-p/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology