ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1139

The Virtual Rheumatology Clinic: Virtual Patients for Resident Education in Rheumatology

Bethany A. Marston1, David Siegel2, Allen P. Anandarajah3 and Valerie Lang4, 1Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 2Pediatrics, University of Rochester/Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, 3Dept of Rheumatology, Univ of Rochester Medical Ctr, Rochester, NY, 4Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Education and online resources

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Education - Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Rheumatology topics can be challenging for residents to master during training. In our program, a survey of residents completing a 2- or 4-week rheumatology elective in 2014-15 demonstrated that many still felt unprepared to provide primary care (67%) or inpatient care (46%) for patients with rheumatologic disease, and for board exams (56%). Residents were confident in their ability to diagnose rheumatologic conditions (71%) but less confident in management of these conditions (47%). We aimed to assess the role of the Virtual Rheumatology Clinic, an online self-study tool developed to supplement resident education in rheumatology through virtual exposure to several common rheumatologic diagnoses, in enhancing the education of the resident.

Methods:  Four virtual patient cases were developed to introduce evaluation and management options for patients presenting with symptoms commonly seen in primary care: 1) monoarticular swelling in an adult, 2) joint swelling in a child, 3) fatigue and unexplained fever, and 4) back pain. Each case begins with the complaint and proceeds through several stages. Learners’ decisions shaped the virtual patient’s course, allowing the trainee to practice longitudinal decision making and experimentation in a safe environment. Activities included drag-and-drop quizzes, script concordance testing, procedure simulation, and matching exercises, and offer immediate feedback to enhance learning. Links to images, videos, review articles, and primary literature were embedded as well. Modules were available to residents on the web via any computer or tablet. Rotating residents were given time to complete these modules during their elective. Participating residents were asked to complete a pre-test, a post-test associated with each module, and a final survey.

Results: Ten residents rotating in 2015-16 completed the pretest and survey, 7 completed at least one module post-test, and 16 completed the final survey. On post-tests, residents scored higher on knowledge-based multiple choice questions than on key features questions, (76% vs 64% average score). On a 0-10 scale, residents who completed at least one module rated these as helpful (8.8), easy to use (8.7), and realistic (8.1). They were rated as more useful in learning to care for patients in a primary care setting (8.7) or in the hospital (8.3) than for board study (7.4). Residents who completed modules were more confident in their ability to manage rheumatologic conditions and expressed greater interest in caring for patients with these conditions than those who did not complete any modules.

Conclusion:  The Virtual Rheumatology Clinic is a an online self-study tool developed to provide virtual exposure to common rheumatologic diagnoses likely to present in primary care. Participants in the pilot cohort found it helpful, easy to use, and realistic, and useful for a variety of settings. It is unclear whether participation increased interest in rheumatology or whether participants are self-selecting. Future work may be able to better assess knowledge acquisition and clinical reasoning skills by random selection of questions to be completed either before or after completion of each module.


Disclosure: B. A. Marston, None; D. Siegel, None; A. P. Anandarajah, None; V. Lang, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Marston BA, Siegel D, Anandarajah AP, Lang V. The Virtual Rheumatology Clinic: Virtual Patients for Resident Education in Rheumatology [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-virtual-rheumatology-clinic-virtual-patients-for-resident-education-in-rheumatology/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-virtual-rheumatology-clinic-virtual-patients-for-resident-education-in-rheumatology/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology