ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 320

The Value of Adjusting for Physical Activity When Measuring Osteoarthritis-Related Pain

Kelli Allen1, Katherine Hall2, Jennifer H. Lindquist3, Shannon Taylor4 and Cynthia Coffman5, 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Durham VA Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Durham VA Medical Center and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 3Health Services Research, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, 4Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, 5Health Services Research, Durham VA Medical Center and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, outcomes, Pain and physical activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects - ARHP Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Measures of chronic pain typically do not account for individuals’ physical activity (PA) levels.  Although PA is essential for managing conditions like osteoarthritis (OA), some people may reduce activity to manage their pain.  Recent research showed that a PA-adjusted pain measure was more strongly associated with radiographic OA severity than an unadjusted pain measure.  We extend this area of research by examining whether PA-adjusted pain is also more closely associated with key function and quality of life outcomes.

Methods:  In a subset of 140 Veterans (M age=61.8 years, 87.1% male) enrolled in a clinical trial of group vs. individual physical therapy, we used the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Scale and calculated four composite WOMAC pain and Physical Activity (WOPA) scores using accelerometer-derived data.  Specifically, WOMAC pain scores were adjusted for: 1) step counts, 2) time in sedentary activity, 3) time in moderate-intensity activity, and 4) energy expenditure (kilocalories).  All data were from baseline assessments.  We examined associations of WOMAC pain score and each of the four WOPA scores with six OA-related outcomes: 6-minute walk test, 8-foot walk test, chair stand test, self-reported satisfaction with physical function, fatigue (brief fatigue inventory), and anxiety / depressive symptoms (single item).  Analyses were partial correlations, controlling for age, gender and body mass index.

Results: Significant (p<0.05) associations were found between WOMAC / WOPA scores and OA-related outcomes in the majority (22/30) of models (Table 1).  In all cases greater pain was associated with poorer outcomes.  For the four OA-related outcomes that measure aspects of physical function (six-minute walk, chair stands, 8-foot walk, satisfaction with function), the step-count adjusted and energy expenditure adjusted WOMAC pain scores had stronger associations (partial r’s=0.24-0.45) than the unadjusted WOMAC pain scores (partial r’s=0.15-0.25).  For fatigue, unadjusted WOMAC pain and energy expenditure adjusted WOMAC pain scores had similar associations (partial r’s=0.27 and 0.28), and for anxiety and depressive symptoms, the unadjusted WOMAC pain score had the strongest association (partial r=0.31). 

Conclusion:   Results suggest PA-adjusted pain measures may add increased value in predicting some OA-related outcomes and should be explored further, particularly in longitudinal studies.  Step-count adjusted pain (which was associated with radiographic OA severity in previous research) and energy expenditure adjusted pain may be particularly useful in predicting functional outcomes.   

Table 1. Partial Spearman Correlations (r) of Pain / Physical Activity Measures with OA-Related Outcomes

WOMAC Pain

r (p-value)

WOMAC-Step Count

r (p-value)

WOMAC-Sedentary / Light Activity

r (p-value)

WOMAC-

 ≥ Moderate Intensity Activity

r (p-value)

WOMAC-Energy Expenditure

r (p-value)

6-Minute Walk

-0.19 (0.04)

-0.32 (<0.01)

-0.15

(0.09)

-0.17

(0.06)

-0.31

(<0.01)

Chair Stands

0.15

(0.11)

0.36 (<0.01)

0.08

(0.36)

0.17

(0.07)

0.35

(<0.01)

8 Foot Walk

0.25 (<0.01)

0.42 (<0.01)

0.20

(0.03)

0.36

(<0.01)

0.45

(<0.01)

Satisfaction with Function

-0.22 (0.02)

-0.26 (<0.01)

-0.20

(0.03)

-0.17

(0.06)

-0.24

(<0.01)

Brief Fatigue Inventory

0.27

(<0.01)

0.19

(0.03)

0.25

(<0.01)

0.04

(0.64)

0.28

(<0.01)

Anxiety & Depression

0.31 (<0.01)

0.20

(0.03)

0.28

(<0.01)

-0.02

(0.83)

0.14

(0.13)

Strongest association for each outcome variable in bold.

 


Disclosure: K. Allen, None; K. Hall, None; J. H. Lindquist, None; S. Taylor, None; C. Coffman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Allen K, Hall K, Lindquist JH, Taylor S, Coffman C. The Value of Adjusting for Physical Activity When Measuring Osteoarthritis-Related Pain [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-value-of-adjusting-for-physical-activity-when-measuring-osteoarthritis-related-pain/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-value-of-adjusting-for-physical-activity-when-measuring-osteoarthritis-related-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology