ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2913

The Validity Of Patient-Reported Short-Term Complications Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplast

Leslie R. Harrold1, David Ayers2, Regis O'Keefe3, Courtland Lewis4, Vincent Pellegrini5 and Patricia D. Franklin2, 1University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 2Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 3University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 4Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 5Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, outcome measures and total joint replacement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Research and Health Services

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Given the absence of national longitudinal data on patients who undergo total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and the limitations of hospital databases to capture information on patients who seek post-TJA care elsewhere, there is growing interest in using patient self-report to identify complications following surgery. We examined the concordance between patients self-report of potential short-term complications with review of available medical records. 

Methods: Patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty from 7/1/11 through 12/3/12 participating in a tertiary care center were identified. Patients completed a 6-month post-operative survey regarding evaluation at an emergency department, day surgery or hospitalization for possible medical or mechanical complications following primary TKA/THA. We reviewed available inpatient and outpatient medical records and examined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values for patient-self report and medical records.

Results: There were 328 patients who had 339 surgeries and completed the 6-month questionnaire.  Patients reported 46 medical encounters (emergency department, day surgery or inpatient care): 15 were excluded as they were hospitalizations >90 days following surgery or unlikely to be related to TJA (e.g., tooth extraction) resulting in a 10% possible event rate; 12% of the events occurred at hospitals different from the surgical hospital. Review of medical records revealed 6 additional medical encounters that patients had not mentioned including 3 hospitalizations following surgery (2 for leg pain and 1 for cellulitis) and 3 emergency department visits where no complications from TJA were identified. Patient self-report of emergency department, day surgery and inpatient care for possible complications was both sensitive (91%) and specific (100%). The positive predictive value was 100% and negative predictive value 99%. 

Conclusion: We examined the concordance between patients’ self-report of possible complications following surgery with review of available medical records and found a sensitivity of 91% and positive predictive value of 100% suggesting this approach may be used to augment current hospital post-discharge surveillance procedures. Patients appropriately reported medical care signifying potential adverse events following TJA.  Given the new public reporting requirements of all post-TJA discharge complications, patient reported post-operative events may augment current hospital-specific surveillance procedures.


Disclosure:

L. R. Harrold,

CORRONA, Inc.,

5;

D. Ayers,

AHRQ, Zimmer,

2;

R. O’Keefe,
None;

C. Lewis,
None;

V. Pellegrini,
None;

P. D. Franklin,

NIAMS-NIH, NLM-NIH, AHRQ, Zimmer, ,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-validity-of-patient-reported-short-term-complications-following-total-hip-and-knee-arthroplast/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology