ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1261

The Usefulness Of Traditional Neurocognitive Testing and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antibodies In Pediatric Lupus Patients

Natasha M. Ruth1, Mary C. Kral2, Tamara K. Nowling3, Stephanie Slan4, Murray H. Passo5 and Gary S. Gilkeson4, 1Pediatric Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 2Genetics and Developmental Pediatrics, MUSC, Charleston, SC, 3Medicine/Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina and Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, 4Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 5Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus, neuropsychiatric disorders and pediatrics

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology - Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects II: Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Pediatric Vasculitis and Pediatric Myositis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: In order to identify lupus patients at risk for CNS disease, and specifically, cognitive dysfunction, the ACR recommended a standard battery of tests for use in individuals with SLE.  This led to the use of formal neurocognitive testing as the gold standard when measuring cognitive function in SLE.  Almost all studies when measuring neurocognitive function in SLE use a standardized battery of traditional psychometric tests.  These tests have been used to assess which areas of cognition are most affected in patients with SLE and also to help assess the validity of other tools that are thought to be useful in measuring cognitive function in SLE.  Anti-NMDA receptor antibodies are anti-double stranded DNA antibodies that cross-react with the NMDA receptors NR2a and NR2b. The activation of the NMDA receptor is critical in learning and memory and is expressed on neurons throughout the hippocampus and cortex. To measure the prevalence of anti-NMDA receptor antibodies in pediatric patients with SLE and JIA and to assess the association between elevated anti-NMDA receptor antibodies and neurocognitive dysfunction in these populations.

Methods:   Patients diagnosed with SLE prior to age of 18 were recruited.  Each underwent formal neurocognitive testing. The test battery included a comprehensive assessment of cognitive domains. The patients also underwent NMDA receptor-NR-2 subunit antibody testing by ELISA. 

Results: 21 pediatric lupus and 9 JIA patients were enrolled in the study. Independent samples t-tests comparing group means on the cognitive data revealed statistically significant group differences for full scale IQ (t=-3.173, p<.01), auditory working memory (t=-2.180, p<.05), single word reading skills (t=-3.001, p<.01), math calculation skills (t=-2.805, p<.01). There were trends toward significance in verbal memory (t=-1.997, p=.056), inattention [omission errors on the CPT-II] (t=2.025, p-.053) and reading fluency (t=-1.968, p=.059).  In all cases above, the JIA group outperformed the cSLE group.  There was not a significant group difference for the NMDA receptor antibody levels.  There was a significant correlation between the NMDA receptor antibody level and the CPT-II reaction time (r=.542, p<.01) ie. the higher the antibody value, the slower the reaction time for all participants (including JIA patients and SLE patients).

Conclusion: Patients with SLE appear to have multiple areas of cognition that are affected as determined by traditional neurocognitive testing.  NMDA receptor antibodies do not appear to correlate well with the formal testing except in the area of reaction time.  Although promising in mouse models, this antibody may not prove to be a good biomarker for assessing cognition in pediatric patients with SLE.


Disclosure:

N. M. Ruth,
None;

M. C. Kral,
None;

T. K. Nowling,
None;

S. Slan,
None;

M. H. Passo,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

G. S. Gilkeson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-usefulness-of-traditional-neurocognitive-testing-and-n-methyl-d-aspartate-receptor-antibodies-in-pediatric-lupus-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology