ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1183

The Treatment Of Gout In Relation To The 2012 Uric Acid Target Guidelines In The US Population

Stephen Juraschek1, Lara Kovell2, Edgar Miller III2 and Allan C. Gelber3, 1Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 3Medicine/ Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, guidelines and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

The Treatment of Gout in Relation to the 2012 Uric Acid Target Guidelines in the US Population

 

 

Background/Purpose: Gout is a debilitating form of arthritis mediated by elevated serum uric acid (SUA) levels. Pharmacologic interventions to prevent recurrent gout are largely focused on urate-lowering therapy (ULT). In 2012, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) released gout management guidelines encouraging providers to target a SUA <6 mg/dL. The proportion of US adults with gout undergoing ULT, in relation to this SUA target, is unknown. Further, while gout risk factors are well-characterized, demographic and clinical factors associated with a SUA above target have not been determined.

Methods: We examined the National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES), in the 1988-1994 and 2007-2010 survey periods. Participants <20 years or those missing data for SUA, ULT use, or gout status were excluded. Gout status was based on self-report of a physician (or health professional) diagnosis. According to the recent ACR gout treatment guidelines, a SUA above target in participants with gout was defined as a SUA ≥6.0 mg/dL in both men and women. Demographic and clinical factors associated with a SUA above target among NHANES participants with gout, were analyzed using adjusted and weighted Poisson regression.

Results: There were 15,505 NHANES participants in 1988-1994 and 10,977 in 2007-2010, among whom 443 and 514 had gout, respectively. The prevalence of gout rose from 2.7% in 1988-1994 to 3.7% in 2007-2010. In 2007-2010, the mean age was 48 years; 52% were female, 69% were white, 10% were black, and 8% were Mexican American. Notably, 66% of US adults with gout in 2007-2010 had a UA ≥6 mg/dl (Figure); among this hyperuricemic subgroup, 79% were not using ULT. In both time periods, higher BMI (prevalence ratio: 1.02 per 1 kg/m2; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.03; P = 0.02) and ULT (prevalence ratio: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.70; P <0.001) were associated with a SUA above target (Table). Male sex, reduced glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), low HDL cholesterol, and diuretic use were significantly associated with a SUA above target in a least one time period.

Conclusion: The majority of US adults with gout had a SUA above the ACR target level and were not taking ULT. This study establishes a meaningful baseline to assess the effectiveness of ACR treatment guidelines for lowering UA in coming years.

 


Table. Demographic and clinical factors associated with a uric acid level above target (≥6 mg/dL) among US adults with gout.

1988-94 (N with gout = 443)

2007-10 (N with gout = 514)

Prevalence Ratio

(95% CI)*

P

Prevalence Ratio

(95% CI)*

P

Age, per 10 yrs

1.01 (0.91, 1.11)

0.92

0.99 (0.90, 1.10)

0.91

Male

1.31 (0.95, 1.81)

0.10

1.87 (1.51, 2.30)

<0.001

Race/Ethnicity

Non-Hispanic white

1.0 (reference)

–

1.0 (reference)

–

Non-Hispanic black

1.19 (0.97, 1.44)

0.09

0.83 (0.69, 1.01)

0.06

Mexican American

1.11 (0.78, 1.59)

0.56

0.90 (0.74, 1.11)

0.31

Body mass index per 1 kg/m2

1.02 (1.01, 1.03)

<0.001

1.02 (1.00, 1.03)

0.02

eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73m2

1.43 (1.13, 1.81)

<0.001

1.17 (1.00, 1.37)

0.06

Low HDL cholesterol

0.97 (0.77, 1.21)

0.77

1.25 (1.03, 1.51)

0.03

Urate-lowering therapy†

0.55 (0.40, 0.76)

<0.001

0.56 (0.45, 0.70)

<0.001

 

Diuretic medications

1.32 (1.05, 1.64)

0.02

 

1.20 (0.97, 1.47)

0.09

*All models were adjusted for age, sex (vs. female), race/ethnicity (vs. non-Hispanic white), body mass index, eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73m2 (vs. eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min per 1.73m2), low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (vs. elevated high density lipoprotein cholesterol), elevated total cholesterol (vs. low total cholesterol), hypertension (vs. no hypertension), diabetes (vs. no diabetes), no urate lowering therapy (vs. urate lowering therapy), diuretic use (vs. no diuretic medication use), and alcohol use (vs. never drank alcohol). Clinical factors that were not significant in either survey period (i.e.  total cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, and alcohol use)  were not shown.

†Allopurinol, probenecid, sulfinpyrazone, or combination colchicine-probenecid

Bar graph_ult_2.gif


Disclosure:

S. Juraschek,

NIH,

2;

L. Kovell,
None;

E. Miller III,
None;

A. C. Gelber,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-treatment-of-gout-in-relation-to-the-2012-uric-acid-target-guidelines-in-the-us-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology