ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1022

The Risk of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis after Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair Vs Partial Meniscectomy Vs the General Population

Martin Englund1, Aleksandra Turkiewicz2, Dan Bergkvist3, Paul Neuman4 and Fredrik Persson4, 1Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Lund, Sweden, 2Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Lund, Sweden, 3Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 4Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Orthopedics, Malmoe, Sweden

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Knee, meniscectomy, meniscus, osteoarthritis and registry

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects I: Epidemiology and Progression

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Traumatic meniscus injury is associated with increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of meniscus repair, beyond short time symptom relief and restoration of knee biomechanics, is to reduce the risk of later knee OA. However, the long-term consequences of meniscus repair have not been sufficiently investigated. Thus, our objective was to compare the consultation rate for symptomatic knee OA in patients after meniscus repair, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), and in the general population.

Methods: We identified patients aged 16-45 years having had meniscus surgery due to acute meniscus tear in 1998-2009 in southern Sweden by a healthcare register. All patients were followed from the time of first meniscus surgery until a diagnosis of knee OA, relocation outside the Skåne region, death, or December 31st, 2014. We studied the consultation rate for knee OA compared to the general population as well as calculated the age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for knee OA consultation after meniscus repair vs. APM.

Results: We identified 2409 patients with an acute meniscus tear (mean [SD] age 30.5 [8.6] years); 211 (8.8%) of them had had meniscus repair. The absolute risk of having consulted for knee OA during the study period was 16.4% after APM, 10.0% after meniscus repair, and 2.1% in the general population (Figure). The age- and sex-standardized incidence of knee OA was 110/10 000 person-years after meniscus repair, 165/10 000 person-years after APM, and 19/10 000 person-years in the general population. The HR for knee OA after repair vs APM was: 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51, 1.24). A sensitivity analysis, excluding cases with OA within the first 2 years post-surgery, yielded the HR of 0.53 (95% CI 0.27, 1.04).

Figure. The survival estimates for doctor-diagnosed knee osteoarthritis among persons aged 16 to 45 years in patients having had arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), meniscal repair or in the general population.

Conclusion: The point estimates suggests about 20-50% lower risk of knee OA in patients after meniscus repair as compared to patients with APM. However, the consultation rate for OA after repair was still at least 2.5 times higher as compared to the general population.  


Disclosure: M. Englund, None; A. Turkiewicz, None; D. Bergkvist, None; P. Neuman, None; F. Persson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Englund M, Turkiewicz A, Bergkvist D, Neuman P, Persson F. The Risk of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis after Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair Vs Partial Meniscectomy Vs the General Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-risk-of-symptomatic-knee-osteoarthritis-after-arthroscopic-meniscus-repair-vs-partial-meniscectomy-vs-the-general-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-risk-of-symptomatic-knee-osteoarthritis-after-arthroscopic-meniscus-repair-vs-partial-meniscectomy-vs-the-general-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology