ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1646

The Real-World Experience of Combined Cranial and Large Vessel FDG-PET/CT in the Investigation of Giant Cell Arteritis

Keren Port1, Ivan Ho Shon1, Sally Ayesa1, Rachel Langford1, Olivia Bennett1, Andrew Csillag1, Stacey Fredericks1, Luz Palacios-Derflingher2, Eva Wegner1 and Anthony Sammel1, 1The Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 2University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders I: Imaging

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: GCA is a systemic medium-large vessel vasculitis (M-LVV) involving the cranial arteries, aorta and its major branches. Recent studies have shown that PET/CT including the cranial and large vessels offers high diagnostic accuracy for GCA in research settings. At our institution in Sydney, Australia, PET/CT is the protocolized first-line investigation for GCA, and here we report its diagnostic performance in this “all comer” real world setting.

Methods: We audited all inpatients and outpatients investigated with PET/CT for suspected new onset GCA between July 2019 and March 2022. Patients were scanned from vertex to thighs with arms by their side, 90 minutes post-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) administration. Patients completed a self-reported questionnaire at the time of scan. Scans were reported by the experienced nuclear medicine physician of the day as overall positive, equivocal or negative for M-LVV. FDG uptake by vascular region was also reported. The gold standard comparator was the treating clinician’s diagnosis of active M-LVV at a minimum of 6 months post the time of the scan. Active M-LVV included diagnoses of GCA, large vessel vasculitis and aortitis. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) and vascular US results conducted within 4 weeks of scan were recorded.

Results: 135 patients underwent PET/CT for suspected new onset GCA, with a median age of 73 years (range 48-98), 70% were female. 86 (63.7%) patients were taking glucocorticoids at the time of scan. 44 (32.6%) patients had a final clinical diagnosis of active M-LVV. 35 (25.9%) scans were reported as positive, 27 (20%) equivocal and 73 (54.1%) negative for M-LVV. The likelihood ratio for a diagnosis of active M-LVV with a positive scan was 70.3, equivocal scan 0.59, and a negative scan 0.12. Sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) of PET/CT was dependent on treatment of equivocal scans in the binary analysis. If equivocal scans were excluded, Sn was 89.5% and Sp 98.6%. If equivocal scans were considered positive, Sn was 90.9% and Sp 75.8%. If equivocal scans were considered negative, Sn was 77.3% and Sp 98.9%. 55/135 (40.7%) patients underwent TAB and/or US (27 TAB, 33 US, 5 both TAB and US) as an additional investigation to PET/CT. 13/55 (23.6%) in this cohort had equivocal PET/CT scans, and 11/13 of the additional test (TAB/US) results matched the clinical diagnosis. In the total cohort, TAB had a Sn of 42.9% and Sp of 100%, and US had a Sn range of 53.3% to 66.7% (dependent on treatment of the 2 equivocal US) and Sp of 88.9%. For the 34 patients with positive PET/CT scans and a clinical diagnosis of M-LVV, significant FDG uptake was most commonly reported in the supra-aortic (88.2%), followed by cranial (55.9%), aortic (52.9%) and infra-aortic (23.5%) regions.

Conclusion: This is the largest real-world study of combined cranial and large vessel PET/CT as a first-line test for GCA. PET/CT had good diagnostic performance with sensitivity ranging from 77.3 to 90.9%, and specificity 75.8 to 98.9% for a clinician diagnosis of active M-LVV, dependent on treatment of equivocal scans. TAB and/or US can be used as ancillary tests to help confirm a diagnosis when PET/CT is indeterminate or discordant with the clinical presentation.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Patient baseline characteristics
Values are number (%) of patients, except where indicated otherwise
PMR = polymyalgia rheumatica
TAB = temporal artery biopsy
US = vascular ultrasound temporal +/- axillary arteries
High dose glucocorticoid use = prednisone ≥40mg oral daily or methylprednisolone ≥500mg IV daily
M-LVV = medium-large vessel vasculitis

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Overall interpretation of PET/CT compared to clinician final diagnosis

Supporting image 3

Table 3: PET/CT performance analysis for clinician final diagnosis of M-LVV,
M-LVV = medium-large vessel vasculitis
PPV = positive predictive value
NPV = negative predictive value
CI = confidence interval
AUC = area under the receiver operating curve


Disclosures: K. Port: None; I. Ho Shon: None; S. Ayesa: None; R. Langford: None; O. Bennett: None; A. Csillag: None; S. Fredericks: None; L. Palacios-Derflingher: None; E. Wegner: None; A. Sammel: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Port K, Ho Shon I, Ayesa S, Langford R, Bennett O, Csillag A, Fredericks S, Palacios-Derflingher L, Wegner E, Sammel A. The Real-World Experience of Combined Cranial and Large Vessel FDG-PET/CT in the Investigation of Giant Cell Arteritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-real-world-experience-of-combined-cranial-and-large-vessel-fdg-pet-ct-in-the-investigation-of-giant-cell-arteritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-real-world-experience-of-combined-cranial-and-large-vessel-fdg-pet-ct-in-the-investigation-of-giant-cell-arteritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology