ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1438

The Ratio Between Biological and Glucocorticoid Use in Different Countries Worldwide: Results from the METEOR Registry

Isabell Nevins1, CF Allaart1, David Vega Morales2, Lai Ling Winchow3, Arvind Chopra4, Ana Maria Rodrigues5, Tom Huizinga1, Maarten Boers6 and Sytske Anne Bergstra7, 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico, 3Chris hani baragwanath academic hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa, 4Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Pune, Maharashtra, India, 5Reuma.pt, Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia, Lisbon, Portugal, 6Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biologicals, glucocorticoids, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Previous studies have demonstrated differing bDMARD prescription rates between countries, which seems to be amongst others related to a country’s socioeconomic status. In contrast, the costs of glucocorticoids (GC) are significantly lower and it may be hypothesized that when less bDMARDs are used, GC use increases. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate globally the ratio between bDMARD and GC use, and to assess whether this relates to a country’s socioeconomic status (SES).

Methods: Data on bDMARD and GC use were extracted from the METEOR database: an international database capturing daily clinical practice data from patients with a clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Countries were included that had contributed at least 60 newly diagnosed patients, as of 1-1-2007. The ratio between the proportion of patients who had ever used a bDMARD and the proportion of patients who had ever used a GC (with no concomitant bDMARD use) during a total follow up duration of five years (bDMARD/GC ratio) was calculated per country. Univariable linear regression was used to analyze the bDMARD/GC ratios according to publicly available country-level indicators of SES (measured in GDP per capita, household net disposable income and health expenditure per capita, expressed in International dollar (IntI$) to account for the differences in purchasing power)

Results: Data from 10,856 patients covering eight different countries showed varying baseline characteristics (table 1) and proportions of bDMARD use. The number of included patients ranged from 64 (Spain) to 8484 (India). The percentage of females and patients with ACPA positive antibodies ranged from 64% (GB) to 86% (Spain) and from 28% (Mexico) to 81% (Spain), respectively. Mean baseline disease activity score (DAS28) varied between 4.8 (Spain) and 6.3 (India). The percentage of patients who used a bDMARD during five years follow up, ranged from 1% (South Africa and India) to 28% (United States, state of Massachusetts) and who used a GC at some time (with no concomitant bDMARD use) during five years follow up, ranged from 19% (Great Britain) to 94% (South Africa) (figure 1). Higher country-level wealth measured in GDP per capita, health expenditure per capita and household net disposable income were related to a higher bDMARD/GC ratio. For every 10,000 IntI$ increase in GDP per capita, household net disposable income and health expenditure per capita, the bDMARD/GC ratio (range 0 to 1) was observed to increase by a value of β 0.1 (95% CI 0.07;0.2, p< 0.001), β 0.3 (95% CI 0.2;0.5, p< 0.05) and β 0.6 (95% CI 0.4;0.9, p< 0.001), respectively (figure 2).

Conclusion: In this analysis based on a worldwide cohort capturing eight countries, we show that the bDMARD/GC ratio indeed differs across countries. These differences are significantly related to general country-level indicators of level of wealth, a higher proportion of patients using bDMARDs and/or a smaller proportion of patients using GCs.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: I. Nevins, None; C. Allaart, None; D. Vega Morales, None; L. Winchow, None; A. Chopra, None; A. Rodrigues, None; T. Huizinga, None; M. Boers, Novartis; S. Bergstra, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nevins I, Allaart C, Vega Morales D, Winchow L, Chopra A, Rodrigues A, Huizinga T, Boers M, Bergstra S. The Ratio Between Biological and Glucocorticoid Use in Different Countries Worldwide: Results from the METEOR Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-ratio-between-biological-and-glucocorticoid-use-in-different-countries-worldwide-results-from-the-meteor-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-ratio-between-biological-and-glucocorticoid-use-in-different-countries-worldwide-results-from-the-meteor-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology