ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 893

The Presence of Extractable Nuclear Antigens (ENA) Antibodies in a Large Population-based Cohort from the Netherlands and Their Association with Known Risk Factors for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Primary Sjögren Syndrome

Petra Yntema-Eckenhaussen 1, Suzanne Arends 1, Elisabeth Brouwer 2, Caroline Roozendaal 3, Hendrika Bootsma 4, Johanna Westra 1 and Karina de Leeuw1, 1Dept. of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology - University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 2Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 3Dept. of Laboratory Medicine - University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 4University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: autoantibodies, population studies, SLE and Sjogren's syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S101: Epidemiology & Public Health II: SLE (892–897)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Previous studies have demonstrated that years before clinical onset of auto-immune diseases, auto-antibodies can already be present. However, it is also known that some individuals can have these auto-antibodies and will never develop an auto-immune disease. So far, little information is available on the presence of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENA) in the general population in relation to the risk of developing an auto-immune disease, with special interest for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjögren Syndrome (pSS).

Objectives To estimate the prevalence of anti-ENA and their association with the presence of known risk factors for SLE and pSS in the general Dutch population.

Methods: Methods Lifelines is a prospective population-based cohort study in the Netherlands. Cross-sectional data from 40,135 participants were analyzed. The detection of anti-ENA was performed using the ENA-CTD (connective tissue disease) screen on the Phadia-250 analyzer with a ratio >1.0 considered positive. An extensive questionnaire was taken on demographic and clinical information (e.g. early musculoskeletal symptoms). Furthermore, some general blood parameters were available. SLE and pSS were defined by a combination of self-reported SLE or pSS, specific medication use and visiting a medical specialist within the last year. Characteristics were compared between 3 groups: SLE/pSS patients, anti-ENA positive, and anti-ENA negative participants.

Results: Results Of the total 40,135 consecutive individuals, 41 were detected as having defined SLE or pSS of whom 49% were anti-ENA positive. SLE/pSS patients were older and more often female. Of the remaining individuals (40,094), 1089 (2.7%) were found anti-ENA positive. Anti-ENA positivity was significantly associated with older age, female gender and joint stiffness compared to anti-ENA-negative participants. Interestingly, levels of haemoglobin, leucocytes and lymphocytes were significantly decreased in anti-ENA-positive participants compared to anti-ENA-negative participants. SLE/pSS participants had even significantly lower haemoglobin and reported even more joint stiffness then anti-ENA positive individuals. Lower lymphocyte levels, gender and older age appear as significantly independent predictors of anti-ENA positivity and also for being defined SLE/pSS. Of the anti-ENA positive individuals, 2.3% were positive for anti-dsDNA as well as anti-SSA. These individuals showed significantly lower lymphocyte-, leukocyte-, neutrophilic granulocyte- and monocyte levels compared to other anti-ENA positive participants.

Conclusion: Conclusion In this large population-based study, the prevalence of anti-ENA-positivity was 2.8% for the total group and 2.7% when excluding patients with SLE or pSS. Older age, female gender, joint complaints and lower levels of hemoglobin, leucocytes and lymphocytes were more frequently present in anti-ENA-positive participants. Longitudinal studies are performed up to 15 years to investigate which individuals might develop SLE or pSS to be able to develop prediction models.


Disclosure: P. Yntema-Eckenhaussen, None; S. Arends, None; E. Brouwer, Roche, 5, 8; C. Roozendaal, None; H. Bootsma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, HarmonicSS, 2, MedImmune, 2, 5, Medimmune, 5, Novartis, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Union Chimique Belge, 5; J. Westra, None; K. de Leeuw, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yntema-Eckenhaussen P, Arends S, Brouwer E, Roozendaal C, Bootsma H, Westra J, de Leeuw K. The Presence of Extractable Nuclear Antigens (ENA) Antibodies in a Large Population-based Cohort from the Netherlands and Their Association with Known Risk Factors for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Primary Sjögren Syndrome [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-presence-of-extractable-nuclear-antigens-ena-antibodies-in-a-large-population-based-cohort-from-the-netherlands-and-their-association-with-known-risk-factors-for-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-presence-of-extractable-nuclear-antigens-ena-antibodies-in-a-large-population-based-cohort-from-the-netherlands-and-their-association-with-known-risk-factors-for-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology