ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 1533

The Performance Characteristics of Composite Measures Used in a Randomized Trial Examining Etanercept and Methotrexate as Monotherapy or in Combination in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Laura Coates1, Joseph Merola 2, Philip Mease 3, Alexis Ogdie 4, Dafna Gladman 5, Vibeke Strand 6, Leonieke van Mens 7, Lyrica Liu 8, Priscilla K Yen 8, David Collier 8, Gregory Kricorian 8, James Chung 8 and Philip Helliwell 9, 1University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Swedish Medical Center/Providence St Joseph Health, and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4Department of Medicine and Rheumatology and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 5Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 7University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 9University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR/ARP Annual Meeting 2019

Keywords: Disease Activity, etanercept and PASDAS, methotrexate (MTX), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Composite measures of disease activity are used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but their relative performance and contributions of individual components to overall scores are unclear.  Primary results were reported* from a phase 3 trial that randomized methotrexate (MTX)- and biologic-naïve patients with active PsA to weekly: MTX 20 mg; etanercept (ETN) 50 mg; or ETN 50 mg + MTX 20 mg.  At week 24, the ETN-containing arms were significantly more effective than MTX monotherapy in achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 response (primary endpoint) and Minimal Disease Activity response (key secondary endpoint).  Compared with MTX monotherapy, the ETN-containing arms also had a composite score change from baseline at week 24 that was larger with Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and numerically higher with Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA).*  Here we further examine the trial composite measures by analyzing contributions of individual components to the change in overall composite scores from baseline at week 24 for: PASDAS, DAPSA, Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI).

Methods: Using the full analysis set of 851 patients, the median and mean (95% CI) contribution of each individual domain change to the composite measure change from baseline at week 24 was calculated.  Analyses were repeated for PASDAS in patient subsets with enthesitis or dactylitis at baseline.

Results: The ETN-containing arms had a greater composite score change from baseline at week 24 compared with MTX monotherapy; PASDAS and DAS28-CRP had relatively greater changes compared with DAPSA, CDAI, and SDAI (Table 1).  For DAPSA, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI, the joint count changes contributed most to score changes, while the global assessment changes contributed less (Table 2).  In contrast, the global assessment changes contributed the most to the PASDAS score changes, with less contribution from joint count changes (Table 3).  Contribution of enthesitis change to the PASDAS score change in those with enthesitis at baseline was similar to that of the joint counts; in those with dactylitis at baseline, the contribution of dactylitis change was more than that of the joint counts.  Except for DAS28-CRP, the composite score changes showed minimal contributions from changes in CRP.  Overall, the contributions of changes in the individual components to the composite score changes were similar between treatment arms.

Conclusion: Results show that changes in “joint-focused” composite endpoints (DAPSA, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI) are driven most by joint count changes and less by global assessment changes.  Change in PASDAS, which captures a wider range of disease domains, was driven most by global assessment changes (and somewhat by physical function) and less by other domain changes depending on the patient population.  Changes in CRP consistently contributed less than other components.  Results were consistent across treatment arms. 

*Mease et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Feb 12. doi: 10.1002/art.40851 [Epub ahead of print].

Linda Rice at Amgen Inc assisted in writing this abstract.


Table 1 Coates et al

Table 1. Composite Measure Change from Baseline at Week 24


Table 2. Coates et al

Table 2. Contribution of Each Component Measure Change to the Change in the Composite Score From Baseline to Week 24 for DAPSA, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI


Table 3. Coates et al

Table 3. Contribution of Each Component Measure Change to the Change in the Composite Score From Baseline to Week 24 for PASDAS


Disclosure: L. Coates, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prothena, Sun Pharma, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, 8, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, 2, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Novartis, Pfizer, 2, Abbvie, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, 2, Amgen, 5, 8, Biogen, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Prothena, 5, Sun Pharma, 5, UCB, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5; J. Merola, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Aclaris, 2, 5, Almirall, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Biogen Idec, 2, 5, Biogen IDEC, 5, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard, 3, Burrage Capital Management Boston Advisory Board, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, Dermavant, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Leo Pharma, 2, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 5, Merck Research Laboratories, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 5, Samumed, 2, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sanofi Regeneron, 2, 5, Science 37, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; P. Mease, Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 2, 5, Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 2, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Leo, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB., 5, 8, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., and UCB, 2, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb,Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, 8, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, and UCB, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Boerhinger Ingelheim, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, 8, Celgene Corp., 2, 5, 8, CORRONA, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 2, 5, 8, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, 8, Janssen Inc, 2, 5, 8, Leo, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 6, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, Sun, 2, 5, SUN, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, 2, 5, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 6, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8; A. Ogdie, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, 5, Amgen, 2, 4, 5, 8, Amgen to Forward National Databank, 2, BMS, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 4, 5, 8, Corrona, 5, CORRONA, 5, From Noavrtis to husband, 7, Lilly, 5, Lily, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 7, Novartis to UPenn, 2, Novartis, Pfizer, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Pfizer to UPenn, 2; D. Gladman, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, BMS, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead, 5, GSI, 5, Janssen, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; V. Strand, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Amgen, Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, AURA, 8, Bayer, 5, BMS, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Celltrion, 5, Cleveland Clinic, 8, CORRONA, 5, Crescendo, 5, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, EMD Serono, 5, Genentech, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 5, Horizon, 5, Inmedix, 5, Janssen, 5, Kezar, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 5, NACCME, 8, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Purdue, 8, RA Forum, 8, RAN, 8, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Samsung, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, Servier, 5, Setpoint, 5, SLRA, 8, UCB, 5, Up to Date, 7, Washington University, 8, WIR, 8, WRA, 8; L. van Mens, None; L. Liu, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4; P. Yen, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4; D. Collier, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4, Amgen, Inc, 1, 3; G. Kricorian, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4; J. Chung, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4; P. Helliwell, AbbVie, 2, 8, Amgen, 8, Celgen, 8, Celgene, 8, Galapagos, 8, Janssen, 2, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 8, Pfizer Inc, 8, UCB, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Coates L, Merola J, Mease P, Ogdie A, Gladman D, Strand V, van Mens L, Liu L, Yen P, Collier D, Kricorian G, Chung J, Helliwell P. The Performance Characteristics of Composite Measures Used in a Randomized Trial Examining Etanercept and Methotrexate as Monotherapy or in Combination in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-performance-characteristics-of-composite-measures-used-in-a-randomized-trial-examining-etanercept-and-methotrexate-as-monotherapy-or-in-combination-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARP Annual Meeting 2019

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-performance-characteristics-of-composite-measures-used-in-a-randomized-trial-examining-etanercept-and-methotrexate-as-monotherapy-or-in-combination-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology