ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1533

The Performance Characteristics of Composite Measures Used in a Randomized Trial Examining Etanercept and Methotrexate as Monotherapy or in Combination in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Laura Coates1, Joseph Merola 2, Philip Mease 3, Alexis Ogdie 4, Dafna Gladman 5, Vibeke Strand 6, Leonieke van Mens 7, Lyrica Liu 8, Priscilla K Yen 8, David Collier 8, Gregory Kricorian 8, James Chung 8 and Philip Helliwell 9, 1University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Swedish Medical Center/Providence St Joseph Health, and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4Department of Medicine and Rheumatology and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 5Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 7University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 9University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, etanercept and PASDAS, methotrexate (MTX), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Composite measures of disease activity are used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but their relative performance and contributions of individual components to overall scores are unclear.  Primary results were reported* from a phase 3 trial that randomized methotrexate (MTX)- and biologic-naïve patients with active PsA to weekly: MTX 20 mg; etanercept (ETN) 50 mg; or ETN 50 mg + MTX 20 mg.  At week 24, the ETN-containing arms were significantly more effective than MTX monotherapy in achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 response (primary endpoint) and Minimal Disease Activity response (key secondary endpoint).  Compared with MTX monotherapy, the ETN-containing arms also had a composite score change from baseline at week 24 that was larger with Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and numerically higher with Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA).*  Here we further examine the trial composite measures by analyzing contributions of individual components to the change in overall composite scores from baseline at week 24 for: PASDAS, DAPSA, Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI).

Methods: Using the full analysis set of 851 patients, the median and mean (95% CI) contribution of each individual domain change to the composite measure change from baseline at week 24 was calculated.  Analyses were repeated for PASDAS in patient subsets with enthesitis or dactylitis at baseline.

Results: The ETN-containing arms had a greater composite score change from baseline at week 24 compared with MTX monotherapy; PASDAS and DAS28-CRP had relatively greater changes compared with DAPSA, CDAI, and SDAI (Table 1).  For DAPSA, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI, the joint count changes contributed most to score changes, while the global assessment changes contributed less (Table 2).  In contrast, the global assessment changes contributed the most to the PASDAS score changes, with less contribution from joint count changes (Table 3).  Contribution of enthesitis change to the PASDAS score change in those with enthesitis at baseline was similar to that of the joint counts; in those with dactylitis at baseline, the contribution of dactylitis change was more than that of the joint counts.  Except for DAS28-CRP, the composite score changes showed minimal contributions from changes in CRP.  Overall, the contributions of changes in the individual components to the composite score changes were similar between treatment arms.

Conclusion: Results show that changes in “joint-focused” composite endpoints (DAPSA, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI) are driven most by joint count changes and less by global assessment changes.  Change in PASDAS, which captures a wider range of disease domains, was driven most by global assessment changes (and somewhat by physical function) and less by other domain changes depending on the patient population.  Changes in CRP consistently contributed less than other components.  Results were consistent across treatment arms. 

*Mease et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Feb 12. doi: 10.1002/art.40851 [Epub ahead of print].

Linda Rice at Amgen Inc assisted in writing this abstract.


Table 1 Coates et al

Table 1. Composite Measure Change from Baseline at Week 24


Table 2. Coates et al

Table 2. Contribution of Each Component Measure Change to the Change in the Composite Score From Baseline to Week 24 for DAPSA, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI


Table 3. Coates et al

Table 3. Contribution of Each Component Measure Change to the Change in the Composite Score From Baseline to Week 24 for PASDAS


Disclosure: L. Coates, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prothena, Sun Pharma, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, 8, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, 2, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Novartis, Pfizer, 2, Abbvie, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, 2, Amgen, 5, 8, Biogen, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Prothena, 5, Sun Pharma, 5, UCB, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5; J. Merola, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Aclaris, 2, 5, Almirall, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Biogen Idec, 2, 5, Biogen IDEC, 5, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard, 3, Burrage Capital Management Boston Advisory Board, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, Dermavant, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Leo Pharma, 2, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 5, Merck Research Laboratories, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 5, Samumed, 2, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sanofi Regeneron, 2, 5, Science 37, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; P. Mease, Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 2, 5, Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 2, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Leo, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB., 5, 8, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., and UCB, 2, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb,Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, 8, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, and UCB, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Boerhinger Ingelheim, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, 8, Celgene Corp., 2, 5, 8, CORRONA, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 2, 5, 8, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, 8, Janssen Inc, 2, 5, 8, Leo, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 6, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, Sun, 2, 5, SUN, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, 2, 5, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 6, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8; A. Ogdie, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 5, 8, AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, 5, Amgen, 2, 4, 5, 8, Amgen to Forward National Databank, 2, BMS, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 4, 5, 8, Corrona, 5, CORRONA, 5, From Noavrtis to husband, 7, Lilly, 5, Lily, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 7, Novartis to UPenn, 2, Novartis, Pfizer, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Pfizer to UPenn, 2; D. Gladman, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, BMS, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead, 5, GSI, 5, Janssen, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; V. Strand, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Amgen, Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, AURA, 8, Bayer, 5, BMS, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Celltrion, 5, Cleveland Clinic, 8, CORRONA, 5, Crescendo, 5, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, EMD Serono, 5, Genentech, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 5, Horizon, 5, Inmedix, 5, Janssen, 5, Kezar, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 5, NACCME, 8, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Purdue, 8, RA Forum, 8, RAN, 8, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Samsung, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, Servier, 5, Setpoint, 5, SLRA, 8, UCB, 5, Up to Date, 7, Washington University, 8, WIR, 8, WRA, 8; L. van Mens, None; L. Liu, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4; P. Yen, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4; D. Collier, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4, Amgen, Inc, 1, 3; G. Kricorian, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4; J. Chung, Amgen Inc., 1, 3, 4; P. Helliwell, AbbVie, 2, 8, Amgen, 8, Celgen, 8, Celgene, 8, Galapagos, 8, Janssen, 2, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 8, Pfizer Inc, 8, UCB, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Coates L, Merola J, Mease P, Ogdie A, Gladman D, Strand V, van Mens L, Liu L, Yen P, Collier D, Kricorian G, Chung J, Helliwell P. The Performance Characteristics of Composite Measures Used in a Randomized Trial Examining Etanercept and Methotrexate as Monotherapy or in Combination in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-performance-characteristics-of-composite-measures-used-in-a-randomized-trial-examining-etanercept-and-methotrexate-as-monotherapy-or-in-combination-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-performance-characteristics-of-composite-measures-used-in-a-randomized-trial-examining-etanercept-and-methotrexate-as-monotherapy-or-in-combination-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology