ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
    • 2017-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • Meeting Resource Center

Abstract Number: 2339

The Patient’s Perspective of Glucocorticoid Use: A Systematic Literature Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies

Jonathan Cheah1,2, Joanna Robson3,4, Rachel Black5,6, Susan M. Goodman7,8, Susan Lester9,10, Sarah Mackie11 and Catherine Hill6,12, 1Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 3Faculty of Health and Applied Science, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom, 4School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 5Rheumatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 6Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 7Rheumatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 8Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 9Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 10Discipline of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 11NIHR-Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 12The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adverse events, glucocorticoids, patient participation and steroids

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Session Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II: Patient Perspectives

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain widely used and have well documented adverse effects. However, the impact of these adverse effects from the perspective of the patient, rather than of the clinician, remains relatively unexplored. Additionally, no general patient reported outcome measure has been developed to assess GC adverse effects and impact across rheumatological conditions. The aim of this literature review was to identify the impacts of systemic GC use that are of importance to patients.

Methods:

An academic librarian searched OVID EMBASE, OVID MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL for articles published from inception to October 2017, related to three concepts: GCs, the patient perspective and adverse effects. Inclusion criteria included systemic GC use for any indication in an adult population and both qualitative and quantitative research methodology. Titles and abstracts were then manually screened by two independent reviewers and subsequent quality assessment and data extraction also completed by two independent reviewers. A meta-synthesis of the qualitative data was performed separately by two independent researchers before qualitative meta-summary was utilized to quantitatively aggregate the findings (combining quantitative and qualitative results), including the derivation of frequency effect sizes to identify those outcomes most prominently featured across all reviewed articles.

Results:

The initial search retrieved 1,356 articles, of which 24 (18 quantitative, 6 qualitative) were deemed suitable for quality assessment and data extraction (Figure). Studies included the assessment of GC use across a variety of diseases both rheumatologic (e.g. RA, vasculitis) and non-rheumatologic (including asthma, inflammatory bowel disease and multiple sclerosis). Four major themes emerged amongst the 71 discrete outcomes (Table): physical symptoms (44), psychological symptoms (18), effect on participation (6) and contextual factors (3).

Conclusion:

Patients with a broad range of inflammatory diseases and demographic features describe key cross-cutting themes in relation to GCs and their impact on health-related quality of life. This work will inform the development of a core domain set for clinical trials involving GCs and a patient reported outcome to measure the impact of GCs from the patient’s perspective.


Disclosure: J. Cheah, None; J. Robson, ChemoCentryx, 5,ABROGATE trial, 6; R. Black, None; S. M. Goodman, Roche, Novartis, 4; S. Lester, None; S. Mackie, PMRGCAuk, 6,PMR and GCA North East, 6,Sanofi, 5,GSK, 5; C. Hill, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cheah J, Robson J, Black R, Goodman SM, Lester S, Mackie S, Hill C. The Patient’s Perspective of Glucocorticoid Use: A Systematic Literature Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-patients-perspective-of-glucocorticoid-use-a-systematic-literature-review-of-quantitative-and-qualitative-studies/. Accessed March 21, 2023.
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-patients-perspective-of-glucocorticoid-use-a-systematic-literature-review-of-quantitative-and-qualitative-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

ACR Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium 2020

© COPYRIGHT 2023 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Wiley

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
  • Advanced Search
  • Meeting Resource Center
  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences