ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0570

The Patient Perspective on Using Digital Resources to Address Unmet Needs in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Jennifer Ra1, Jerik Leung2, Elizabeth Baker2 and Alfred Kim1, 1Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 2Saint Louis University, College for Public Health and Social Justice, St. Louis

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: quality of life, Social support, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Health Services Research Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The clinical variability of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) caused by the unpredictability of flares contributes to patients experiencing a diminished sense of social support. Digital health interventions (DHI) – interventions accessible through digital technologies (i.e. apps, internet) on devices such as mobile phones, tablets, and computers – have the potential to improve this eroded social support. Digital resources have shown to improve disease self-management and health-related quality of life in other chronic diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain. However, DHIs for SLE have yet to be studied extensively. Our objective was to assess: 1) general and SLE-specific internet usage and 2) specific suggestions for SLE-related digital resources and tools among SLE patients at the Washington University Lupus Clinic.

Methods: Fifty-six patients with American College of Rheumatology or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classified SLE were recruited from the Washington University Lupus Clinic. Because SLE affects mostly women, only female patients were considered. No other specific characteristics were sought.

Ten-minute structured interviews were conducted. Multiple choice questions assessed internet access, types of devices used to access the internet, how patients currently use the internet for their SLE, what topics they would be interested to see in the future, and demographics. Open-ended questions assessed what other SLE-related information or support they would like to use the internet for and what would make them more likely to use it for their SLE needs. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted with the quantitative data, while the qualitative data was analyzed using an open coding approach, where similar or recurring responses were categorized into themes and subthemes.

Results: Nearly all respondents indicated having access to the internet (98.2%, n=55). Currently, 80.0% (n=44) use the internet to locate SLE-related information, all of whom were interested in continuing or increasing this use. Participants indicated that they were interested in most topics presented (i.e. connecting with other SLE patients, nutrition and SLE, new/alternative treatments). The qualitative data indicated that SLE patients: 1) used the internet for understanding flares, changes in their symptoms, and/or lab results; 2) wanted a greater variety of SLE information; 3) wanted to exchange personal experiences and knowledge of SLE with others; and 4) desired increased diversity in the methods of delivering digital SLE information.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that patients were not only already using the internet for their SLE, but also eager to provide suggestions to improve current digital resources. A primary suggestion from patients was a desire for dynamic, interactive resources that would enable patients to access content according to the symptomatology they are experiencing. Other considerations include developing interventions that are customizable to the patient and provide SLE information that is consistent with that received from their healthcare providers. We believe that our findings will aid future development of DHIs for SLE patients.


Disclosure: J. Ra, None; J. Leung, None; E. Baker, None; A. Kim, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, 5, Annexon Biosciences, 5, JPMorgan Chase & Co., 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ra J, Leung J, Baker E, Kim A. The Patient Perspective on Using Digital Resources to Address Unmet Needs in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-patient-perspective-on-using-digital-resources-to-address-unmet-needs-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-patient-perspective-on-using-digital-resources-to-address-unmet-needs-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology