ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0464

The Impact of Timely Post-Discharge Follow-up on Readmission Risk Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Maria Schletzbaum1, Nadia Sweet2, W Ryan Powell2, Andrea Gilmore Bykovskyi3, Farah Kaiksow2, Ann Sheehy2, Amy Kind2 and Christie Bartels2, 1University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Middleton, WI, 2University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 3University of Wisconsin - Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Disparities, Health Services Research, Medicare, quality of care, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Abstracts: Health Services Research (0462–0465)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-11:15AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has the 6th highest hospital readmission rate of all US chronic diseases with significant health disparities and costs. Transitional care management with higher reimbursement for post-discharge care within 14 days has been shown to decrease 30-day hospital readmissions in other chronic diseases. However, the impact of timely follow-up care (within 14 days) on readmission has not been evaluated among SLE patients. Our objectives were to (1) examine predictors of timely post-discharge follow-up and (2) compare all-cause 30-day readmissions after hospitalization with and without timely ambulatory follow-up among SLE patients.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a 20% random sample of all US Medicare hospitalizations in 2014. Hospitalized patients in the study had an SLE diagnosis code, age ≥18 years, alive at discharge, discharged to home, and not receiving hospice. Baseline characteristics of patients with inpatient stays with and without follow-up with a primary care provider or rheumatologist within 14 days of index hospital discharge were compared. Multivariate general estimating equation (GEE) models clustered by patient were used to determine the predictors and the effects of timely follow-up on 30-day rehospitalization risk.

Results: Compared to SLE admissions with timely (within 14 days) post-hospitalization follow-up (n=3118, 36%), those without timely follow-up (n=5530, 64%) were more likely to be younger, non-White, and living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods (Table 1). Patients without timely follow-up were more likely to have comorbidities such as renal failure, depression, and tobacco, drug, or opioid use disorders. Observed thirty-day readmission rates were higher among those without timely follow-up (26% vs 20%), and only 11% of follow-up within 14 days was with rheumatology. Young adults had 10% lower timely follow-up (27 vs 37%) and 15% higher readmissions (37 vs 22%; Tables 2 & 3). Multivariable predictors of timely follow-up showed higher odds per year of age (aOR 1.01 (1.01,1.02); Table 2), but lower odds for those with renal failure (aOR 0.74 (0.65,0.84)), and those residing in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods (aOR 0.87 (0.76,0.99)) and rural areas (aOR 0.72 (0.58,0.88)). Timely post-discharge follow-up predicted 21% lower odds of readmission (aOR 0.79 (0.70,0.89); Table 3). Unlike younger age, race/ethnicity, rurality, and neighborhood disadvantage did not predict readmission risk after considering timely follow-up.

Conclusion: Hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with SLE were 20% less likely to be readmitted within 30 days if they received post discharge follow-up within 14 days with either rheumatology or primary care, even after adjusting for comorbidities. Adjusted risk factors for lack of timely follow-up care included younger age, living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods or in a rural area, and renal failure. To overcome limitations in this study our next analysis will explore whether immortal time bias influences outcomes. Other future studies should investigate targeted interventions to increase timely post-discharge follow-up care to reduce SLE readmissions and health disparities.


Disclosures: M. Schletzbaum, None; N. Sweet, None; W. Powell, None; A. Gilmore Bykovskyi, None; F. Kaiksow, None; A. Sheehy, None; A. Kind, None; C. Bartels, Pfizer, Independent Grants for Learning and Change, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Schletzbaum M, Sweet N, Powell W, Gilmore Bykovskyi A, Kaiksow F, Sheehy A, Kind A, Bartels C. The Impact of Timely Post-Discharge Follow-up on Readmission Risk Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-timely-post-discharge-follow-up-on-readmission-risk-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-timely-post-discharge-follow-up-on-readmission-risk-among-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology