ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1484

The Impact of Time Since First Diagnosis on the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Peter Nash1, Maria Greenwald 2, Liang-Hung Lin 3, Wei Yu 4, Paul Santos Estrella 5, Rajiv Mundayat 6, Daniela Graham 7 and Douglas Veale 8, 1University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2Desert Medical Advances, Palm Desert, CA, 3AIR, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan (Republic of China), 4Pfizer Inc, Beijing, China (People's Republic), 5Pfizer Inc, Makati, Philippines, 6Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 7Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 8EULAR Centre For Arthritis And Rheumatic Diseases and The Conway Institute, Dublin, Ireland

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: ACR, DMARDs and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), Psoriatic arthritis, Tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Early identification, diagnosis, and treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is important in preventing long-term joint damage and disability, and the associated socioeconomic consequences.1 Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of PsA. Here, we assessed the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients (pts) with PsA, stratified by time since first PsA diagnosis.

Methods: In this 12-month, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled, Phase 3 study (OPAL Broaden [NCT01877668]),2 pts received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or PBO. Pts had active PsA and an inadequate response to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic DMARD. Pts were stratified by time since first PsA diagnosis: < 2 yrs and ≥ 2 yrs. Efficacy outcomes included response rates at Month (M)3 for ACR20/50/70, HAQ-DI, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)75. Safety outcomes up to M3 were also assessed.

Results: This analysis included 316 pts; 100 pts in the < 2 yrs group, and 216 in the ≥ 2 yrs group. Baseline demographics and characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups and across stratification groups; however, pts in the ≥ 2 yrs group were older (mean age: 49.6 yrs vs 44.6 yrs in the < 2 yrs group). Mean disease duration was 1.0 yrs (min–max: 0.3–1.8 yrs) for the < 2 yrs group, and 8.8 yrs (min–max: 2.0–39.0 yrs) for the ≥ 2 yrs group. At M3, the response rates for ACR20/50/70, HAQ-DI, and PASI75 were greater in tofacitinib-treated pts, compared with PBO-treated pts for both the < 2 yrs and the ≥ 2 yrs group (Figure 1). Across the efficacy outcomes, the response rates for tofacitinib-treated pts in the < 2 yrs group were similar to the ≥ 2 yrs group; however, for pts treated with tofacitinib 10 mg, PASI75 response was lower in the < 2 yrs group. Response rates were higher with PBO in the < 2 yrs group vs the ≥ 2 yrs group. The difference in ACR20 response rates for tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg vs PBO was 9.8% and 21.5%, respectively, in the < 2 yrs group; and 20.0% and 29.9%, respectively, in the ≥ 2 yrs group. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, deaths, and most common AEs are reported in Table 1. There was one case of herpes zoster (tofacitinib 5 mg, < 2 yrs group).

Conclusion: For pts with active PsA, the efficacy of tofacitinib was greater than PBO, irrespective of disease duration; however, PBO response was generally greater in the < 2 yrs group vs ≥ 2 yrs group. Due to the low numbers in the < 2 yrs group and the post hoc nature of this analysis, these results should be interpreted with caution. Safety outcomes were consistent with those previously reported for tofacitinib in pts with PsA.3

  1. Van den Bosch F et al. Lancet 2018;391:2285-94.
  2. Mease P et al. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1537-50.
  3. Gladman D et al. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1525-36.

Acknowledgments: Study sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support provided by Siobhán Hoy of CMC Connect and was funded by Pfizer Inc.


Disclosure: P. Nash, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; M. Greenwald, None; L. Lin, None; W. Yu, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; P. Santos Estrella, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; R. Mundayat, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; D. Graham, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; D. Veale, Health Beacon, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nash P, Greenwald M, Lin L, Yu W, Santos Estrella P, Mundayat R, Graham D, Veale D. The Impact of Time Since First Diagnosis on the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-time-since-first-diagnosis-on-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-tofacitinib-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-time-since-first-diagnosis-on-the-efficacy-and-safety-of-tofacitinib-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology