ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2645

The Impact of Metformin on Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Cara McLeod1, Gbemisola Olayemi1, Nitasha Bhatia2, Frank Migliore3 and Robert Quinet1, 1Rheumatology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, 2Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, 3Rheumatology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Metformin is a mainstay of therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Newer evidence suggests that metformin may reduce lupus flares. An entity called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) has been found to be important in the pathogenesis of lupus, as they promote plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) to differentiate and activate. These PDCs, when activated, release interferon α (IFNα), which plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of lupus. The formation of NETs is reactive oxygen species (ROS) dependent. Metformin can selectively inhibit mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I and decrease NADPH oxidase activity leading to a reduction in ROS production. A November 2015 article by Wang H, et al in Arthritis and Rheumatology designed a randomized, proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin on a background of corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents in patients with mild or moderate lupus. That study demonstrated that add-on metformin reduced the risk of disease flares by 51% compared with conventional treatment only. Prednisone exposure was also lower in the metformin add-on group than in the conventional treatment group. The objective of our study is to compare the disease activity of lupus patients on metformin versus those not on metformin.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of lupus patients followed in our Rheumatology clinic over one year. The primary outcome was to determine if lupus patients on metformin had lower disease activity compared to those not taking metformin. The population for review included those from the Lupus Initiative. We compared the mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores which measures disease activity between the two groups.

Results: In total, 15 patients out of 1446 patients with lupus were taking metformin. Using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, there was a statistically significant difference in patients SLEDAI scores between the lupus patients taking metformin versus the lupus patients not taking metformin (SLEDAI z=-2.7, p= 0.0061). We found that the average SLEDAI score in those patients taking metformin was lower compared to those who were not on metformin. This is likely due to the mechanism of metformin which selectively inhibits mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I and decreases NADPH oxidase activity leading to decreased production of ROS. Reduced ROS production thus leads to fewer NETs forming, thus fewer PDCs differentiate and there is reduced release of IFNα which is a pivotal player in the pathogenesis of lupus. Further study comparing the mean prednisone dose between the two groups is currently underway.

Conclusion: We identified that lupus patients taking metformin had a lower median SLEDAI score compared to the patients not taking metformin. Metformin may play an important role in decreasing lupus flares by targeting NET activity and further research into this association should be done, as this may be one of the new approaches to treating lupus.


Disclosure: C. McLeod, None; G. Olayemi, None; N. Bhatia, None; F. Migliore, None; R. Quinet, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McLeod C, Olayemi G, Bhatia N, Migliore F, Quinet R. The Impact of Metformin on Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-metformin-on-disease-activity-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-metformin-on-disease-activity-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology