ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0212

The Impact of Immunosuppression on the Humoral Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines in SLE

Rebecca Sadun1, Dan Crair2, Emmanuel B Walter3, Jennifer Rogers1, Megan Clowse4, Amanda Eudy5, Kai Sun1, Jayanth Doss1, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber6, Sarah Valencia2 and M. Anthony Moody6, 1Duke University, Durham, NC, 2Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC, 3Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 4Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC, 5Duke University, Raleigh, NC, 6Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: B-Lymphocyte, Biologicals, COVID-19, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0196–0228) Infection-related Rheumatic Disease Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The ACR’s COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance recommends all patients with rheumatic diagnoses be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. The predominant SARS-CoV-2 vaccines used in the United States are based on mRNA technology. Little is known about the immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with SLE, many of whom are on immune suppressing medications. This study sought to determine the humoral immunogenicity of two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines made by Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech in SLE patients, stratified by immunosuppression.

Methods: We obtained biobanked serum from SLE patients and healthy control patients whose blood was drawn 14-180 days following dose #2 of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. ELISA was performed using anti-wild-type spike protein ectodomain S1+S2. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each individual. An AUC threshold of 2.0 was established to distinguish between responders and non-responders (Figure 1).

Results: Of the SLE patients (n=87), 23 (26%) were on no SLE therapy or HCQ monotherapy, 44 (51%) were on a DMARD and ≤7.5mg of prednisone, and 20 (23%) patients were on a biologic (rituximab=3, belimumab=11) and/or high-dose prednisone. Figure 2 depicts concomitant use of DMARDs and belimumab. As summarized in Table 1, the AUC for SLE patients was not significantly lower than for healthy controls (n=12): median AUC of 7.09 (range 0.34-11.45) versus 7.30 (range 5.89-8.65). The median AUC for SLE patients on no lupus medications or hydroxychloroquine monotherapy was 7.44 (range 0.34-10.52), with only one patient (4%) being classified as a non-responder. Ten (23%) of the SLE patients on DMARDs were non-responders, with mycophenolate and methotrexate having the biggest impact on AUC: seven (35%) of the patients on mycophenolate were non-responders (AUC median = 5.31; p=0.008), and 30% of the patients on methotrexate were non-responders (AUC median = 7.28; p=0.31). Three (15%) of the SLE patients on biologics and/or high-dose prednisone were non-responders, including two of the 11 belimumab patients (18%), one of whom was on concomitant mycophenolate, and the other on high-dose prednisone (20 mg daily). All three rituximab patients were classified as responders, although the median AUC (4.67) and mean AUC (4.68) were the lowest of any medication (range 3.73-5.65). The number of days between dose #2 and serum sample collection did not correlate with AUCs: the 13 non-responders were on average 66 days out from dose #2, whereas responders were on average 80 days out from dose #2.

Conclusion: SLE patients on certain immune suppressing medications, most notably mycophenolate, produce less SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibodies after receiving two doses of an mRNA vaccine. Neutralization assays and cell-based studies are necessary to understand the full picture of vaccine immunogenicity in SLE; nevertheless, decreased serologic response in SLE patients on certain medications should prompt studies exploring whether holding medications like mycophenolate will enhance the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 and other vaccines.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Histogram depicting the distribution of anti-spike antibody areas under the curve (AUC) in SLE patients (n=87), which formed the basis for establishing the responder threshold of 2.0, at which 13 SLE patients (15%) were determined to be non-responsive.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. Concomitant use of belimumab (Benlysta) and DMARDs (AZA=azathioprine; LEF=leflunomide; MTX=methotrexate, MMF=mycophenolate; Tacro=tacrolimus).

Supporting image 3

Table 1. Serologic responses, quantified as areas under the curve (AUC) for healthy controls, patients on insignificant immunosuppression (HCQ group encompasses patients on no medication or hydroxychloroquine monotherapy), and patients on a variety of immune suppressing medications (MMF=mycophenolate; MTX=methotrexate (n=9) and leflunomide (n=1); AZA=azathioprine; RTX=rituximab). Many of the patients on belimumab were also on >10 mg of prednisone daily. P-values were calculated in reference to the HCQ group.


Disclosures: R. Sadun: None; D. Crair: None; E. Walter: Clinetic, 5, Iliad Biotechnologies, 2, Moderna, 5, Najit biotechnologies, 5, Pfizer, 5, Sequiris, 5, Vaxcyte, 1; J. Rogers: Amgen, 2, Ampel Biosolutions, 1, AstraZeneca, 6, Aurinia, 1, Eli Lilly, 1, Exagen, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Immunovant, 2, 5; M. Clowse: Exagen, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, Immunovant, 5, UCB, 2, 5; A. Eudy: Amgen, 2, Exagen, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Immunovant, 5, Pfizer, 5; K. Sun: AstraZeneca, 6; J. Doss: None; L. Criscione-Schreiber: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, UCB, 5; S. Valencia: None; M. Moody: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sadun R, Crair D, Walter E, Rogers J, Clowse M, Eudy A, Sun K, Doss J, Criscione-Schreiber L, Valencia S, Moody M. The Impact of Immunosuppression on the Humoral Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines in SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-immunosuppression-on-the-humoral-immunogenicity-of-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccines-in-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-immunosuppression-on-the-humoral-immunogenicity-of-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccines-in-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology