ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1282

The Impact of High Disease Activity as Measured by SLEDAI and Drug Burden on Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life and Work Productivity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

Zahi Touma1, Benjamin Hoskin2, Christian Atkinson2, David Bell3, James Pike2, Jennifer Lofland4, Pamela Berry5, Chetan Karyekar5 and Karen Costenbader6, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2ADELPHI REAL WORLD, Bollington, United Kingdom, 3ADELPHI REAL WORLD, Bollington, Macclesfield, United Kingdom, 4Janssen Global Market Access, horsham, PA, 5Janssen Global Services, LLC, Horsham, PA, 6Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Comorbidities

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Although there is abundant literature on healthcare utilization in SLE patients, the impact of disease activity in SLE patients is not well understood.

To quantify the impact of disease activity, as measured by SLEDAI score and drug burden, in SLE patients on health care resource utilization (HCRU), health related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity (WP).

Methods: Data were collected from a cross-sectional survey of 300 rheumatologists completing 752 patient record forms in US and EU5 from the Adelphi Real World 2010 & 2013 Lupus Disease Specific Programmes (DSP). Physicians were asked to complete patient record forms (PRFs) for the next 5 prospectively consulting SLE patients; the same patients were asked to complete patient self-completion (PSC) forms describing how SLE affected them. PRFs collected data pertaining to the patient’s diagnosis, disease history, current clinical outcomes, treatment and management history. PSCs focused on similar data collection and included patient reported outcome measures (PROs). Propensity score matching was used to assess differences in HCRU and PRO scores between SLE patients who had a low disease activity and those who had a high disease activity. Low disease activity was defined as a SLEDAI score of ≤4, a steroid dose of < 7.5mg/day, and not on immunosuppressant or biologic. High disease activity was a SLEDAI score of >4, or on an immunosuppressant, biologic, or steroid dose of >7.5mg/day. Patients were matched on age, sex, and ethnicity.

Results: Data was extracted from 752 PRFs, and 388 PSCs. Using the estimated propensity score each low disease activity patient (n=43) was matched with a high disease activity patient (n=709). Using 1:1 matching, with replacement and allowing for ties, matching resulted in 257 high disease activity patients being used as matches for 43 low disease activity patients. Demographic data are reported in Table 1. Patients with a low disease activity were significantly less likely to be currently flaring, lower number of flares in last 12 months, less likely to have been hospitalized in the last 12 months, had fewer consultations in the last 12 months, reported better HrQoL (EQ5D), more favourable levels of fatigue (FACIT), and lower work impairment (WPAI). (Table 2).

Conclusion: Systemic lupus erythematosus patients with lower levels of disease activity are less burdensome to the healthcare system and experience a significantly better HRQoL and lower levels of productivity impairment. There is a need to establish a universal definition of low disease activity as a treatment goal to benefit patient quality of life and reduce HCRU.


Disclosure: Z. Touma, None; B. Hoskin, None; C. Atkinson, Adelphi Real World, 3; D. Bell, None; J. Pike, Adelphi Real World, 3; J. Lofland, Janssen Market Access, 1; P. Berry, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 1, 3; C. Karyekar, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1, Janssen, 5; K. Costenbader, Glaxo Smith Kline, 5, UpToDate, 7, Lupus Foundation of America, 6, Neutrolis Inc, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Touma Z, Hoskin B, Atkinson C, Bell D, Pike J, Lofland J, Berry P, Karyekar C, Costenbader K. The Impact of High Disease Activity as Measured by SLEDAI and Drug Burden on Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life and Work Productivity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-high-disease-activity-as-measured-by-sledai-and-drug-burden-on-healthcare-utilization-quality-of-life-and-work-productivity-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-high-disease-activity-as-measured-by-sledai-and-drug-burden-on-healthcare-utilization-quality-of-life-and-work-productivity-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology