ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1317

The Epidemiology of Old versus Young Males Referred for BMD Assessment

Muhammed Aqib Khan1, Rabie Hamad1, Hamzah Amin1 and Marwan Bukhari2, 1Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 2University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust, Lancaster, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), osteoporosis, risk factors, Smoking, Statistical methods

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease – Basic and Clinical Science Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Data on osteoporosis in men are scarce. The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) definition of a T-score less than 2.5 has only been described for women. It is therefore important to understand the determinant of poor bone health in males. Males referred for Bone Mineral Density (BMD) estimation are a good source of exploring such poor bone health. We sought to investigate the epidemiology and determinants of reduced bone well-being as well as fragility fractures in a population of males referred for BMD estimation using Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scans.

Methods: Data were obtained from patients in primary and secondary care referred to a district BMD scanner in the Northwest of England. Males referred between 2004 and 2019 were selected and divided into two groups: above and below the median referral age. Initially comparisons were made using Chi Squared test for categorical variables and T-test for continuous variables.

Results: A total of 5390 male patients were included in this analysis, the median age at scan was 66 years (IQR) and the mean age was 76.6 +/- 13.7 (SD). Significantly greater numbers of tibiofibular 210 (7.70%) and rib 138 (5.06%) fractures were seen in those under the age of 66. Whereas their older counterparts saw greater numbers of spine 426 (16%), femur 166 (6.23%) and pelvis 19 (0.71%) fractures, as depicted by Table 1. The table also shows those under the median age had a more extensive history of smoking, steroid, and alcohol use whilst also, on average, being taller and weighing more. Patients in the older cohort, however, had a greater prevalence of Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A summary of the differences is shown in Table 1.

Conclusion: This study identifies alternate fracture patterns among males of differing ages. Those under the age of 66 years saw higher numbers of tibiofibular and rib fractures compared to those older. Such patients also had a more extensive history of smoking as well as steroid and alcohol use. On the other hand, those older than the median age suffered greater numbers of spine, pelvis and femur fractures whilst also being relatively shorter and weighing less. Further work is required to study predictors of fractures in each group adjusted and unadjusted for age.

Supporting image 1

Table 1 – A summary of the pattern of fractures and relevant characteristics of the study cohort.


Disclosures: M. Khan, None; R. Hamad, None; H. Amin, None; M. Bukhari, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khan M, Hamad R, Amin H, Bukhari M. The Epidemiology of Old versus Young Males Referred for BMD Assessment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-epidemiology-of-old-versus-young-males-referred-for-bmd-assessment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-epidemiology-of-old-versus-young-males-referred-for-bmd-assessment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology