ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1181

The Effect Of Uric Acid Lowering Therapy In Preventing Comorbidity and Acute Attack Of Gout; A Retrospective Study

Kowoon Joo1, Won Park1, Seong-Ryul Kwon1, Mie-Jin Lim1, Kyong-Hee Jung1, Hoyeon Joo1 and Sung-Soo Kim2, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea, 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan Univ College of Medicine and Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, South Korea

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

          Background/Purpose: We evaluated the effect of uric acid lowering therapy (ULT) in reducing the new development of comorbidities and the frequency of acute attacks in gout patients.

           Methods: We retrospectively examined data of 200 patients who were diagnosed to have gout according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. The patients with at least 3 years of follow up during the period from January 1996 to December 2012 were divided into 2 groups; those whose mean serum uric acid level (sUA) < 6mg/dL (2012 ACR uric acid treatment target) and mean sUA °Ã 6mg/dL. Comorbidities of gout such as hypertension (HTN), type II diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD) and kidney stone were compared in each group at baseline and at last follow-up visit. Frequency of acute gout attacks were compared between the groups. Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test was used to compare the variables between the 2 groups. McNemar's test was used to evaluate the treatment effects in comorbidities of gout in each group. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

           Results: Fifty-three patients were allocated to the adequately treated group (mean sUA < 6mg/dL) and 147 patients were allocated to the inadequately treated group (mean sUA °Ã 6mg/dL). Only 1 patient in the adequately treated group was woman. Patients in the adequately treated group was older (54 ± 13 years vs. 44 ± 12 years, p<0.001) with lower BMI (24.5 ± 4.5kg/m©÷ vs. 25.9 ± 4.5kg/m©÷, p=0.003) and kept higher medication possession rate (MPR) (94 ±10% vs. 61 ± 27 %, p<0.001) compared to the inadequately treated group. There was no difference in the duration of gout, ULT duration, tophi, family history of gout, smoking, alcohol, hypercholesterolemia between the groups. During the mean follow up period of 8 years, the yearly rate of acute attack (0.25 ± 0.39 vs. 0.47 ± 0.53, p<0.001) was lower in the adequately treated group compared to the inadequately treated group. New development of HTN, DM, CVD and kidney stone was lower in the adequately treated group compared to the inadequately treated group (Table 1). The frequency of CKD tended to decrease in the adequately treated group from 21 patients at baseline to 19 patients at last follow up visit.

           Conclusion: Tight control of uric acid decreased the development of acute gout attacks and comorbidities of gout such as HTN, DM, CVD and urinary stone despite the same CVD risk factors. The renal function can be recovered by intensive ULT therapy.


Disclosure:

K. Joo,
None;

W. Park,
None;

S. R. Kwon,
None;

M. J. Lim,
None;

K. H. Jung,
None;

H. Joo,
None;

S. S. Kim,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-uric-acid-lowering-therapy-in-preventing-comorbidity-and-acute-attack-of-gout-a-retrospective-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology