ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1155

The Effect of Nurse-Led Follow-up in Rheumatoid Arthritis. a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trails

Annette de Thurah1,2, Bente Appel Esbensen3,4, Ida K Roelsgaard4, Tove F Frandsen5 and Jette Primdahl6,7, 1Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DK, Aarhus, Denmark, 2Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DK, Aarhus N, Denmark, 3Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (Copecare), Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DK, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5The knowledge Center of Odense University Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, DK, Odense, Denmark, 6King Christian X’s Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Graasten, Hospital of Southern Jutland, DK, Graasten, Denmark, 7Institute for Regional health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DK, Odence, Denmark

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: meta-analysis, nurse practitioners and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Education - ARHP Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Due to a longer life expectancy in general, the treatment burden of RA is growing, and although treatment is generally becoming more effective and better tolerated, many countries experience an unmet demand for rheumatologists and a current demand for greater cost-effectiveness. For this reason alternatives to conventional outpatient physician-led follow-up have been investigated, i.e. nurse-led follow-up. Thus, the aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, investigating the efficacy of nurse- versus physician-led follow-up in the treat to target strategy in RA.  

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the databases: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and. Eligible trials were all randomized controlled trails reporting on the effect of nurse-led follow-up in managing disease control in RA in comparison to physician-led follow-up at hospitals or medical clinics. This implied nurse-led follow-up for out-patients with RA where nurses performed assessment of tender and swollen joints, evaluated blood-samples and monitored the medical treatment in order to evaluate the patients’ disease activity as part of the consultation. Nurses included rheumatology nurses, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists and advanced nurse practitioners. Physicians included rheumatologists and younger physicians involved in follow-up care of patients with RA.

Results: Eight articles, reporting five studies with 1044 participants in total, were included. All but one study included stable patients who were in remission at baseline.  Overall, no difference in disease activity was found after 48-52 weeks (MD -0.07 (95% CI: -0.23; 0.09)) (Figure 1).  After 84-104 weeks a small statistical, but not clinical relevant difference, was seen in favor of nurse-led follow-up (MD -0.29 (95% CI: -0.53; -0.04). No difference in patient satisfaction was seen after 48-52 weeks (SMD -0.17 (95% CI: -1.00; 0.67). After 84-104 weeks a statistical significant difference was found in favor of nurse consultations.  

Conclusion: Overall no difference was found on the effect of disease activity whether RA patients were offered nurse- or physician led follow-up, but the patients tended to become more satisfied over time in nurse-led follow-up. This evidence supports the understanding that routine disease monitoring of RA patients in stable phase can include specialist nurses. PROSPERO id:CRD42015026151    Figure 1   Forest plot: pooled mean differences for disease activity after one year  

 


Disclosure: A. de Thurah, None; B. A. Esbensen, None; I. K. Roelsgaard, None; T. F. Frandsen, None; J. Primdahl, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

de Thurah A, Esbensen BA, Roelsgaard IK, Frandsen TF, Primdahl J. The Effect of Nurse-Led Follow-up in Rheumatoid Arthritis. a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trails [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-nurse-led-follow-up-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trails/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-nurse-led-follow-up-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trails/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology