ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1553

The Effect of Knee Replacement On Participation Outcomes: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study and Osteoarthritis Initiative

Jessica L. Maxwell1, Jingbo Niu2, Julie J. Keysor3, Tuhina Neogi4, Tianzhong Yang5, Michael C. Nevitt6, Jasvinder A. Singh7, Laura Frey-Law8 and David T. Felson9, 1Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, Boston Univ Sargent College, Boston, MA, 2Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3Physical Therapy, Boston University Sargent College, Boston, MA, 4Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 5Clinical Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 6Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UCSF (University of California, San Francisco), San Francisco, CA, 7Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 8University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 9Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: arthroplasty and disability, Knee

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Little research has explored participation outcomes, defined as involvement in life situations, among persons following knee replacement (KR).  We recently reported (OARSI 2012) that persons undergoing KR did not necessarily show improvement in participation after surgery.  These findings, however, could be due to confounding by indication, thus we sought to examine whether participation restriction differed among persons following KR compared to similarly matched group with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: Subjects were selected from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). We took the pre-KR pain and physical function WOMAC scores of MOST and OAI subjects who were at least one year after KR and matched each of these by quartiles to 1-2 subjects with symptomatic knee OA, (defined as radiographic evidence of knee OA and frequent knee pain over the last 30 days). Participation was measured using the Late Life Disability Instrument (LLDI) at the 60 month visit in MOST and at 48 months in OAI; restriction was defined using a previously established cut-point of < 69/100 on the Instrumental Limitation subscale of the LLDI (LLDI-IL).  Data on covariates was collected at the pre-KR/index visit.

We compared the proportion of subjects with participation restrictions for each group overall and stratified by sex, race, age (< 65, 65-74, ≥75 years), # of comorbidities (> 1), and depressive symptoms (> 16 on CES-D) using chi square analyses. We evaluated the association between KR status and participation restrictions while adjusting for the above covariates, as well as body mass index, educational level, and presence of lower limb or back pain, using conditional logistic regression.

Results: Participation restriction was assessed on average 3 years post-KR and was common in both the post-KR group (45%) and in those with SxOA who had comparable pain/function (43%).  There were no statistical differences in the proportion of participation restriction among subjects in each KR group overall or after stratification. The SxOA group had more younger subjects, fewer Whites and more with other lower limb pain (Table 1). After adjusting for these differences in groups, there was no difference in the odds of participation restriction among subjects with KR compared to those with SxOA (OR 1.0 (0.6, 1.6). Other factors independently associated with participation restrictions included male sex and increased depressive symptoms (Table 2).

Conclusion: Despite prior evidence of improvements in pain and function after knee replacement, the current study demonstrates that after KR, there is no clear difference between those who underwent KR and those who still have SxOA in terms of participation in life activities. Other factors such as sex and depressive symptoms may play more of a role in one’s involvement in life situations.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical status of study subjects at pre-KR visit

Independent Variable

Knee Replacement

Group

Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Group

p-value

Total, n

277

552

Sex:               Women, %                                

66

64

.5

Race:            White , %

86

76

.0007

Age:            <65 years, %

46

55

.01

                     65-74 years, %

45

35

.006

                    75+ years, %

9

10

0.8

Body Mass Index, mean (SD)

32.2 (6.4)

32.4 (6.6)

.99

 Comorbidities: > 1, %

43

43

0.9

Depressive Symptoms: > 16, %

15

17

0.3

Education: < High School, %

5

6

0.6

Pain in lower limbs/back, %

75

83

.01

WOMAC physical function, mean (SD), range 0-68

26.2 (11.7)*

26.1 (11.8)*

0.8

WOMAC pain, mean (SD), range 0-20

8.1 (3.8)*

8.1 (3.8)*

0.9

*Knee replacement and symptomatic OA group matched on these variables

Table 2: Effect of Demographic and Clinical Factors on Participation Restrictions

Independent Variable

Unadjusted OR (95%CI)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)**

Knee Replacement Status (ref=SxOA)

0.9 (0.6, 1.4)

1.0 (0.6, 1.6)

Sex (ref=male)

0.7 (0.4, 1.1)

0.6 (0.4, 1.0)

Race (ref= White)

1.3 (1.2, 1.3)

0.9 (0.5, 1.8)

Age at KR:      (ref= <65)

ref

ref

                           65-74   

1.5 (1.0, 2.3)

1.4 (0.9, 2.3)

                           75+      

0.4 (0.2, 1.0)

0.8 (0.3, 1.9)

Educational status (ref < High school)

1.2 (0.5, 2.9)

1.1 (0.4, 2.6)

Number of Comorbidities (ref ≤ 1)

1.7 (1.1, 2.7)

1.5 (0.9, 2.5)

Body Mass Index (ref <30)

1.8 (1.1, 2.7)

1.6 (0.9, 2.6)

Depressive Symptoms (ref≤16)

2.9 (1.5, 5.3)

2.3 (1.2, 4.5)

Lower Limb and Back Pain

1.4 (0.8, 2.5)

1.3  (0.7, 2.5)

**Adjusted for KR group, sex, race, age category, educational status, # of comorbidities, bmi, depressive symtpoms, lower limb and back pain

.



Disclosure:

J. L. Maxwell,
None;

J. Niu,
None;

J. J. Keysor,
None;

T. Neogi,
None;

T. Yang,
None;

M. C. Nevitt,
None;

J. A. Singh,

research and travel grants from Takeda, Savient, Wyeth and Amgen,

2,

J.A.S. has received speaker honoraria from Abbott,

,

; aConsultant fees from URL pharmaceuticals, Savient, Takeda, Ardea, Allergan and Novartis.,

5;

L. Frey-Law,
None;

D. T. Felson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-knee-replacement-on-participation-outcomes-the-multicenter-osteoarthritis-study-and-osteoarthritis-initiative/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology