ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 633

The Effect of Guselkumab on Dactylitis: Results from a Phase 2 Study in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Dafna D Gladman1, Wolf-Henning Boehncke2, Alice B Gottlieb3, Philip Helliwell4, Peter Nash5, Xie L. Xu6, Stephen Xu6, Yuhua Wang6, Elizabeth C Hsia6,7, Chetan S Karyekar6 and Atul A. Deodhar8, 1Krembil Research Institute, U of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2U of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 3NY Medical College, Metropolitan Hospital, NY, NY, 4U of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5U of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 7U Penn School of Medicine, Phila, PA, 8Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Keywords: Effective, Physical function and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster I: Imaging, Clinical Studies, and Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In a Ph2 study, GUS was shown to be safe&effective in pts w/active PsA. We evaluated effect of GUS on dactylitis in subset of pts w/dactylitis at baseline (BL) from Ph2 GUS PsA study.

Methods: Pts w/active PsA & ≥3% BSA of plaque PsO, despite current or previous treatment, were randomized 2:1 to 100mg SC GUS at wks0,4 then q8w or PBO during a 24wk double-blind treatment (tx) period. At wk16, pts w/<5% improvement in swollen&tender joint counts(SJC/TJC) early escaped(EE). At wk24, PBO group(grp) crossed over to GUS (wks24, 28→ q8w)(PBO→GUS) & GUS grp continued GUS (GUS→GUS)) thru wk44. Dactylitis was assessed by scoring each digit from 0-3(0=absent,1=mild,2=mod, 3=sev), for combined score of 0-60. Sensitivity analysis of change from BL thru wk24 in dactylitic digits was performed(combined score 20). Dactylitis scores during 24wk double-blind tx was analyzed using LOCF imputation for missing data & EE. Dactylitis after wk24 was evaluated using observed data.

Results: Of 149 pts,81 presented w/dactylitis at BL(PBO N=23,mean[SD]=3.9[3.01];GUS N=58, mean[SD]=6.5[6.15]) & 66 continued to active tx period(PBO→GUS N=16;GUS→GUS N=50).The dactylitis subset was similar to overall population in BL characteristics except for higher median values for # of SJC, # of TJC,&CRP. At wks16&24, GUS grp had significantly greater reduction in dactylitis score(wk24 mean[SD] change from BL,PBO:-0.4[6.06];GUS:-3.8[4.93];p=0.006)&a greater % of pts w/dactylitis resolution vs PBO grp(Figure). Consistent results were obtained w/# digits w/dactylitis(wk24 mean[SD] change from BL, PBO:-0.2[3.04];GUS:-2.1[2.21];p=0.003). Improvement in dactylitis seen at wk24 was maintained in GUS→GUS grp(wk56:mean[SD] change from BL=-5.5[4.84],75% of pts w/resolution)& the values for the PBO→GUS grp(wk56:mean[SD]change from BL=-4.4[3.50],93.7% of pts w/resolution)approached those of GUS→GUS grp. Improvement in dactylitis was greater in ACR20/ACR50 responders vs non-responders in GUS-txd pts(Table)&was significantly correlated with improvement in TJC(R=0.38,p=0.004),SJC(R=0.50,p<0.0001),&HAQ-DI score(R=0.33,p=0.013).

Conclusion: GUS is efficacious in resolving symptoms of dactylitis in pts w/active PsA. This effect on dactylitis is correlated with improvement in joint symptoms & physical function.

P=0.001

Table 1. Change in Dactylitis Score in ACR20/50 and PASI75 Responders and Non-responders

Mean (SD) change from BL in Dactylitis Score at Wk24

Non-responders

Responders

p-value

ACR 20

-1.76(7.595), n=21

-4.94(4.666), n=36

0.044

ACR 50

-2.44(6.213), n=36

-6.05(5.133), n=21

0.027

PASI 75

-4.00(2.858), n=13

-3.70(6.736), n=44

0.924


Disclosure: D. D. Gladman, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; W. H. Boehncke, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; A. B. Gottlieb, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; P. Helliwell, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; P. Nash, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; X. L. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; S. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; Y. Wang, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; E. C. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; C. S. Karyekar, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; A. A. Deodhar, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gladman DD, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb AB, Helliwell P, Nash P, Xu XL, Xu S, Wang Y, Hsia EC, Karyekar CS, Deodhar AA. The Effect of Guselkumab on Dactylitis: Results from a Phase 2 Study in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-guselkumab-on-dactylitis-results-from-a-phase-2-study-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-guselkumab-on-dactylitis-results-from-a-phase-2-study-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology