ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1237

The Economic Burden of Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis in the US

J. Bradford Rice1, Alan White1, Philip Galebach1, Andrea Lopez1, Patricia Schepman2, Breanna Popelar3, Michael Philbin4 and Elaine Boing2, 1Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, 2Affiliated with Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals at the time this study was conducted, Hazelwood, MO, 3Xcenda, L.L.C., Palm Harbor, FL, 4Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Hazelwood, MO

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: dermatomyositis, Economics, health care cost and polymyositis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Dermatomyositis and polymyositis (DM/PM) are inflammatory myopathies that can lead to persistent muscle weakness and disability. Although significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and work loss among DM/PM patients have been reported, the economic burden to the national population has not been explored. The aim of this study was to provide a contemporary estimate of the total and incremental direct medical cost burden of DM/PM in the US. Total and incremental indirect work-loss burden attributable to DM/PM were also analyzed.

Methods: Patients aged 18-64 years with a first diagnosis of DM/PM between 1/1/1998 and 3/31/2014 were selected from a large, de-identified, privately-insured administrative claims database (OptumHealth Reporting and Insights). Propensity score (1:1) matching of DM/PM patients with non-DM/PM controls from the same database was performed to reduce baseline differences in demographic characteristics, comorbidities, HCRU, and costs. Healthcare costs (inpatient, outpatient/physician office, emergency department, other, pharmacy) and indirect work loss (disability days, medically-related absenteeism) were compared between matched DM/PM patients and controls from the payer perspective over 12 months post-diagnosis. The prevalence of DM/PM in the US was estimated from the recent literature.

Results: A total of 2,587 DM/PM patients who met the sample selection criteria were matched with a control. Overall, commercial payers incurred $23,064 in total healthcare costs per DM/PM patient during the 12-month outcome period. Relative to controls, DM/PM patients had, on average, $7,368 (47%) higher total healthcare costs ($23,064 vs. $15,695; p<0.001). Paired with US population statistics and estimates of DM/PM prevalence (ranging from 14.8 to 19.5 DM/PM cases per 100,000 persons), results of this analysis suggest that DM/PM patients impose a total direct medical cost burden of approximately $457 to $602 million (in 2013$) to commercial payers, or approximately $146 to $192 million in excess costs over matched controls. Further, work loss among DM/PM patients amounted to $3,621 in annual costs, $633 (21%) more than the non-DM/PM patients ($3,621 vs. $2,988; p<0.001).These results suggest that DM/PM patients impose an indirect cost burden of approximately $76 to $100 million to employers in work-loss costs, or approximately $13 to $17 million in excess work-loss costs compared with matched controls. The estimated total costs (direct and indirect) of DM/PM range from $533 to $702 million a year.

Conclusion: DM/PM is associated with substantial economic burden in the US population due to significantly increased healthcare costs and work loss. Moreover, results of this analysis potentially underestimate the excess burden of DM/PM because a few high-cost DM/PM patients could not be matched. Also, the actual national cost of DM/PM is likely understated as this study excluded individuals 65 years and older, out-of-pocket costs, supplemental insurer payments, and informal caregiving. Finally, only costs in the 12 months following diagnosis were assessed; costs may increase due to changes in disease severity over time.


Disclosure: J. B. Rice, None; A. White, None; P. Galebach, Analysis Group, 5; A. Lopez, None; P. Schepman, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, 2; B. Popelar, Xcenda, 5; M. Philbin, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, 3; E. Boing, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rice JB, White A, Galebach P, Lopez A, Schepman P, Popelar B, Philbin M, Boing E. The Economic Burden of Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis in the US [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-economic-burden-of-dermatomyositis-and-polymyositis-in-the-us/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-economic-burden-of-dermatomyositis-and-polymyositis-in-the-us/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology