ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0465

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Effect on Patients with Chronic Rheumatologic Disease Regarding the Value of Vaccination Recommendations

Rebecca Overbury1, Gregory Stoddard2 and Tracy Frech3, 1University of Utah and Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, 2University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 3University of Utah and Salt Lake Veterans Affair Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, COVID-19, health behaviors, prevention, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes I: COVID-19 (0464–0468)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 5:00PM-5:50PM

Background/Purpose: Vaccinations are an important component of care in rheumatology as many patients are immunocompromised by treatment therapies. Patients are sometimes reticent to receive recommended vaccinations for various reasons. A contributing reason could be an under-appreciation of the positive protective benefit of vaccinations. We hypothesize that patients’ experience with the COVID-19 pandemic may shift this understanding.

Methods: On April 15, 2020, a link to an anonymous online survey was sent to patients cared for in an academic outpatient rheumatology clinic (RO) via the protected electronic medical record email communication system. Formal institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained for completion of anonymous surveys. As this research was low risk, this study qualified for IRB exemption. Statistical analysis included two-tailed Fisher exact test and binary Poisson regression.

Results: A total of 83 patients responded to the survey. Most were female. The majority had “rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune arthritis” (Table 1).  34.9% (n = 29) had been, or knew someone who had been, affected by COVID-19. 14.5% (n = 12) reported that COVID-19 had changed their opinion on the importance of vaccinations. There was no association between age group, gender, or diagnosis and having a changed opinion on the importance of vaccinations. Those who were affected or knew someone affected by COVID-19 were less likely to change their opinion on the importance of vaccinations due to COVID-19 (p=0.049). However, those who had ever declined a vaccination recommend by their doctor were almost three times more likely to change their opinion on the importance of vaccinations due to the COVID-19 pandemic (RR = 2.96, 95% CI [1.05 – 8.36]). 85.5% (n = 71) reported full compliance with previous vaccination recommendations by their doctor and 97.8% (n = 76) reported that they were now “likely” or “very likely” to have a vaccine recommended by their doctor; there was not a statistically significant difference when comparing these responses (p = 0.059). When asked if participants would want a COVID-19 vaccine were it available today, 8.4% (n = 7) would decline. When asked if participants would want a COVID-19 vaccine for their child, were it available today, 3.6% (n = 3) would decline (Figure 1).

Conclusion: Based on this research, most patients in an academic rheumatology clinic would desire a COVID-19 vaccination were it available today, both for themselves and for their children. Personal experiences or exposure to COVID-19 did not change opinions on the importance of vaccinations. However, patients who had previously opted to forgo vaccinations, were more likely to change their opinion on the importance of vaccinations due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although it did not reach statistical significance, there is a trend towards patient expressed intention of compliance with vaccination recommendations after the COVID-19 pandemic. This research suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic may positively affect the likelihood of patients with chronic rheumatologic disease to value and comply with vaccination recommendations offered by their doctor.

Table 1. Demographics

Figure 1. Selected survey results


Disclosure: R. Overbury, None; G. Stoddard, None; T. Frech, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Overbury R, Stoddard G, Frech T. The COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Effect on Patients with Chronic Rheumatologic Disease Regarding the Value of Vaccination Recommendations [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-covid-19-pandemic-and-its-effect-on-patients-with-chronic-rheumatologic-disease-regarding-the-value-of-vaccination-recommendations/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-covid-19-pandemic-and-its-effect-on-patients-with-chronic-rheumatologic-disease-regarding-the-value-of-vaccination-recommendations/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology