ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2134

The Changed Prognosis of Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Karin Britsemmer1 and Dirkjan van Schaardenburg2, 1Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Research Institute / Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Research Institute | Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Epidemiologic methods, longitudinal studies, outcome measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects III: Infections/Risk Factors for Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis/Metrology/Classification/Biomarkers/Predictors of Rheumatolid Arthritis Activity & Severity

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

The Changed Prognosis of Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background/Purpose: The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has changed greatly during the past fifteen to twenty years. Major steps in this development were the introduction of methotrexate in the early nineties, the use of combination therapies including high-dose corticosteroids in the late nineties and the introduction of biologic therapies in the past decade. These improvements resulted in a better outcome and clinical remission became an attainable goal for many patients. This study documents trends in patient outcome over the last decades.

Methods: Five-year follow-up data was used from consecutive early RA patients (according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria), included in the periods 1995-1999, 2000-2004 and 2005-2009. Disease activity (DAS-28), functional status (HAQ) and employment status (hours paid work per week) were used as outcome measures.

Results: 322, 369 and 389 patients were included in the three time periods, respectively. Median follow-up was 2 years. Patients included in 1995-1999 were older compared to the patients from the other periods, while the percentage of ACPA positive patients was higher in the last period. General practitioners referred patients increasingly sooner during the last 15 years. In the periods 1995-1999, 2000-2004 and 2005-2009 new patients with RA were treated in the first year with combination therapy in 13, 45 and 59% and/or biologics in 0, 9 and 19%, respectively. The baseline values of DAS-28, but not HAQ and hours paid work, showed a slight decrease over the three periods. However, after 5 years follow-up these differences were no longer significant. The trends in HAQ did not show differences between the three groups. The hours paid work of patients included in 2005-2009 remained stable during follow-up while the other groups showed a decrease over time. Data on radiographic progression are currently being analyzed.

Conclusion: The results document an increasingly better prognosis of early RA patients over the last 15 years. Early recognition and referral by general practitioners has led to a lower disease activity at baseline. Next, more intensive treatment resulted in improved outcomes. However, despite a favorable trend in work participation, there still remains ample opportunity for a further reduction of disease activity and improvement of function.

Baseline differences between patients of the three time periods

1995-1999

2000-2004

p-value*

2005-2009

p– value*

p– value$

Age, yr

57 (15)

53 (14)

<0.001

53 (13)

<0.001

ns

Female, %

69

72

ns

72

ns

ns

ACPA, %

59

61

ns

75

<0.001

<0.001

RF, %

57

59

ns

58

ns

ns

Disease duration, mos.

5.0 (3.4-8.0)

4.3 (2.6-7.2)

0.015

2.8 (1.6-5.9)

<0.001

<0.001

GP-delay, wk

13 (8-29)

9 (4-21)

<0.001

4 (1-13)

<0.001

<0.001

DAS-28

5.2 (1.2)

5.1 (1.3)

ns

4.9 (1.3)

0.021

0.052

HAQ

1.13 (0.5-1.75)

1.13 (0.75-1.75)

ns

1.13 (0.63-1.63)

ns

ns

Work, h/wk

32.9 (15.9)

30.0 (11.0)

ns

32.6 (12.8)

ns

ns

Values are expressed as mean (SD) or median (IQR) * p-value compared to period 1995-1999

$ p-value compares period 2000-2004 vs 2005-2009


Disclosure:

K. Britsemmer,
None;

D. van Schaardenburg,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-changed-prognosis-of-patients-with-early-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology