ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1265

The Challenges of Managing Gout in Primary Care: Results of a Best Practice Audit

Lisa K. Stamp1, Peter T. Chapman2, Ben Hudson3, Greg Hamilton4 and Andrea Judd5, 1University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand, 3University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand, 4Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand, 5Kaikoura Medical Centre, Kaikoura, New Zealand

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Allopurinol, gout, practice improvement, primary care and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The majority of gout management occurs in primary care and may be suboptimal. While community based clinical trials have reported improvements whether such improvements can be replicated in routine clinical care is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a package of care for (POC) gout in a real life primary care setting.

Methods: A POC was developed reflecting current gout management guidelines including patient education, a structured approach to the management of gout flares and urate lowering therapy (ULT) and screening for co-morbidities. An audit of gout management in a single rural general practice was undertaken before (2012) and after (2015) introduction of the POC. 

Results: In 2012 one-hundred and twenty people with gout and in 2015 one-hundred and seventy one people with gout were identified. After the introduction of the POC more people with gout were prescribed ULT (79/120 (65.8%) vs. 127/171 (74.5%); p=0.12) and there was a significant increase in the median (IQR) number of prescriptions per individual over the 12 month period (1 (0-4) vs. 3 (0-4) p=<0.001)(Figure). There was a significant increase in the number of individuals commenced on allopurinol ≤100mg daily and a corresponding decrease in the number commenced on ≥200mg daily (p<0.001)(Figure). There was a significant increase in the frequency urate testing between 2012 and 2015 ((median (range) 1 (0-3) vs 2 (0-10) respectively p<0.001). Of those individuals who had at least one urate measurement the proportion of individuals who never achieved target urate reduced from 43/67 (64.2%) in 2012 to 52/133 (39.1%) in 2015; p=0.001. With the exception of smoking, screening for important co-morbidities improved significantly after introduction of the POC. Of the 67 individuals who had a urate test in 2012 none received a ULT dose increase despite urate being above target in 46 instances. Of the 133 individuals who had a urate tested in 2015, 34 had at least one increase in allopurinol dose and of the 99 who were not dose escalated 28 were at target urate.

Conclusion: A structured POC can improve gout management in primary care although allopurinol dose escalation remains challenging.

Figure: Differences between 2012 and 2015 with regards to A) number of allopurinol prescriptions and B) allopurinol starting dose

 

 

 


Disclosure: L. K. Stamp, Amgen Inc., 8; P. T. Chapman, None; B. Hudson, None; G. Hamilton, None; A. Judd, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stamp LK, Chapman PT, Hudson B, Hamilton G, Judd A. The Challenges of Managing Gout in Primary Care: Results of a Best Practice Audit [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-challenges-of-managing-gout-in-primary-care-results-of-a-best-practice-audit/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-challenges-of-managing-gout-in-primary-care-results-of-a-best-practice-audit/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology