ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1856

Tenosynovial Aspiration by Ultrasound Guidance: Correlation and Diagnostic Implications of Tenosynovial Analysis and Ultrasound Doppler Signal

Fawad Aslam1, Bryant England 2, Amy Cannella 3, Veronika Sharp 4, Lily Kao 5, Jon Arnason 6, Jemima Albayda 7, Catherine Bakewell 8, Shruti Sanghvi 8, Robert Fairchild 9, Karina Torralba 10, Amy Evangelisto 11, Paul DeMarco 12, Narandra Bethina 13 and Eugene Kissin 14, 1Mayo Clinic, Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, 2VA Nebraska-Western IA Health Care System & University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, 3University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, 4Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, 5Evergreen Medical Group, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, 6University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, 7Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 8Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, 9Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 10Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, 11Arthritis, Rheumatic and Back Disease Associates, Moorestown, NJ, 12Arthritis & Rheumatism Associates PC, Wheaton, MD, 13University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, 14Boston University, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Doppler ultrasound, tendonitis/bursitis and synovial fluid

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M111: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases I (1854–1859)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatologists commonly use synovial fluid analysis and, more recently, US to establish a diagnosis in patients with joint effusions.  Although tenosynovial (TS) effusions are common in rheumatic conditions, there is no guide on how to interpret the cell count of the fluid aspirated from tendon sheaths or how they correlate with US Doppler signal (DS). A multi-center collaboration was organized to prospectively analyze and correlate TS aspirate findings with US DS.  

Methods: Patients with TS aspiration planned as part of routine care were enrolled. Tendon location, clinical diagnosis, synovial fluid analysis and Doppler US images were recorded. Doppler settings were standardized across sites and DS grading was performed blindly by 3 expert rheumatologists based on previously published methodology on a 0-3 semiquantitative scale. Clinical diagnoses were categorized as non-inflammatory (group 1), inflammatory (group 2), or crystal/infection (group 3) related conditions. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using weighted kappa. Spearman’s correlations of median DS with white blood cell (WBC) counts were determined. WBC counts and DS were compared between diagnostic groups using Kruskal-Wallis tests and logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were used to discriminate between inflammatory and non-inflammatory conditions by WBC count or DS.

Results: 100 subjects with successful aspirations were enrolled at 14 participating sites. Subjects were primarily female (65%) and middle aged (mean 62 years). DS inter-rater reliability was substantial (kappa 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.83). Fluid WBC count and DS correlated weakly (Figure 1A), and WBC counts were higher among diagnostic groups 2 and 3 (Figure 1B). There was substantial variability of TS WBC counts within diagnostic groups (ranges for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 4-7,734; 78-147,560; and 130-50,000 cells/μL respectively). Neither group 2 or 3 were significantly associated with higher DS, but notably, group 2 had only 3 (6%) subjects with a DS of 0. A DS of >1 had a sensitivity of 93.8% and specificity of 31.3% and a WBC count of >2000 cells/μL had a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 87.5% for discriminating group 2 vs. group 1. TS fluid WBC counts < 2000 cells/μL were observed in 41.7% of subjects with an inflammatory condition diagnosis (group 2). Crystals were observed in 22% of TS aspirates (CPPD 16% and monosodium urate 6 %).

Conclusion: DS and TS fluid WBC counts provide complementary information when evaluating TS effusions. DS may improve the sensitivity of detecting inflammatory tenosynovitis because TS fluid WBC counts from inflammatory arthritis are frequently in the range that would be considered non-inflammatory based on synovial fluid criteria for joints. While a negative DS strongly predicts a non-inflammatory condition, a positive DS is non-specific and should prompt aspiration for fluid analysis when possible. A TS fluid WBC count >2,000 cells/μL is highly specific for an inflammatory cause. TS fluid can also be used to identify crystal arthropathies.

Correlation of tenosynovial fluid WBC count and ultrasound Doppler score in the tenosynovium

Comparison of tenosynovial fluid WBC count between diagnosis groups


Disclosure: F. Aslam, None; B. England, None; A. Cannella, None; V. Sharp, None; L. Kao, None; J. Arnason, None; J. Albayda, None; C. Bakewell, AbbVie Inc. Regeneron. Novartis; S. Sanghvi, AbbVie Inc.; R. Fairchild, None; K. Torralba, None; A. Evangelisto, None; P. DeMarco, None; N. Bethina, None; E. Kissin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Aslam F, England B, Cannella A, Sharp V, Kao L, Arnason J, Albayda J, Bakewell C, Sanghvi S, Fairchild R, Torralba K, Evangelisto A, DeMarco P, Bethina N, Kissin E. Tenosynovial Aspiration by Ultrasound Guidance: Correlation and Diagnostic Implications of Tenosynovial Analysis and Ultrasound Doppler Signal [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tenosynovial-aspiration-by-ultrasound-guidance-correlation-and-diagnostic-implications-of-tenosynovial-analysis-and-ultrasound-doppler-signal/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tenosynovial-aspiration-by-ultrasound-guidance-correlation-and-diagnostic-implications-of-tenosynovial-analysis-and-ultrasound-doppler-signal/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology