ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2344

Telitacicept versus Belimumab for Patients with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Real-world Observational Study

Zhu Chen1, Huizhi Jin1, Yujing Li1, Guosheng Wang1, Xiaomei Li2, Zhijun Li3, Lin Niu4 and Haifeng Pan5, 1University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, 2University of Science and Technology of China, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Hefei, China, 3Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China, 4Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, China, 5Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2326–2351) SLE – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The past decade has witnessed the innovation of several biologics in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), most of which target B cells, including B-cell activating factor/a proliferation-inducing ligand (BAFF/APRIL) inhibitors. Telitacicept is a TACI–immunoglobulin fusion protein that neutralizes the activity of BAFF and APRIL by competitively inhibiting the TACI site, thereby suppressing the development and survival of plasma cells and mature B cells. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two differentBAFF/APRIL inhibitors, telitacicept and belimumab, in treating patients with active SLE in real world clinical practice.

Methods: Patients with active SLE who received telitacicept (n=72) or belimumab (n=103) from 2019 to 2022 at multiple centers in China were retrospectively reviewed, and the efficacy of telitacicept and belimumab was compared. Patients with renal and hematologic abnormalities were separately selected to confirm the treatment efficacy in these systems. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce selection bias. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors contributing to limited response.

Results: No significant between-group differences in patient characteristics were observed after adjustment by IPTW. The proportion of SLE Responder Index 4 responders at 12 and 24 weeks was significantly higher in the telitacicept group (p < 0.05). Consistently, patients who received telitacicept had a significantly greater decrease in the SLEDAI-2K score and Physician Global Assessment score at 24 weeks (p < 0.05). No significant between-group difference in kidney efficacy was observed, but telitacicept produced greater improvement in patients with anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia at 24 weeks. Importantly, the telitacicept group had a lower incidence of adverse events, especially upper respiratory tract infections, than the belimumab group after the start of therapy (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Telitacicept showed better efficacy and safety than belimumab for patients with active SLE in multiple clinical centers. Further investigations in larger cohorts and head-to-head clinical trials are required to verify these findings.

Supporting image 1

A-C Primary outcome in disease activity over a 24-week period following the introduction of BAFF/APRIL inhibitors after IPTW. (A) Comparison of changes in the proportion of SRI_4 responders after the treatment from 0 to 24 weeks between the belimumab and telitacicept groups. Comparison of changes in (B) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI_2K) score and (C) Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score after the treatment from 0 to 24 weeks with median (IQR).

Supporting image 2

A-D Complement changes and other outcomes in disease activity over a 24-week period following the introduction of BAFF/APRIL inhibitors after IPTW. Comparison of changes in (A) C3 and (B) C4 between the belimumab and telitacicept groups after the treatment from 0 to 24 weeks with median (IQR). Comparison of the rate of (C) Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and (D) relapse between the two groups at 24 weeks.


Disclosures: Z. Chen: None; H. Jin: None; Y. Li: None; G. Wang: None; X. Li: None; Z. Li: None; L. Niu: None; H. Pan: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chen Z, Jin H, Li Y, Wang G, Li X, Li Z, Niu L, Pan H. Telitacicept versus Belimumab for Patients with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Real-world Observational Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/telitacicept-versus-belimumab-for-patients-with-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-retrospective-multicenter-real-world-observational-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/telitacicept-versus-belimumab-for-patients-with-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-retrospective-multicenter-real-world-observational-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology