ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0949

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Women with Lupus Nephritis in Pregnancy Therapeutic CHallenge (SWITCH): The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Experience

Joo Young (Esther) Lee1, Arielle Mendel2, Anca Askanase3, Sang-Cheol Bae4, Jill Buyon5, Ann E Clarke6, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau7, Paul R Fortin8, Dafna Gladman9, John Hanly10, Murat Inanc11, David Isenberg12, Anselm Mak13, Marta Mosca14, Michelle Petri15, Anisur Rahman16, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman17, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero18, Murray Urowitz19, Daniel Wallace20, Sasha Bernatsky21 and Evelyne Vinet2, 1McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 4Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 5NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 6University of Calgary, Division of Rheumatology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada, 7Inserm DR Paris 5, Paris, France, 8Centre ARThrite - CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada, 9Toronto Western Hospital, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 10Division of Rheumatology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center (Nova Scotia Rehabilitation Site) and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, 11Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istambul, Turkey, 12University College London, London, United Kingdom, 13Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 14Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 15Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Baltimore, MD, 16Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 17Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA, Chicago, IL, 18Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada, 19University of Toronto, University Health Network, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 20Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 21Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, pregnancy, Surveys, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: One-third of women with SLE develop lupus nephritis (LN), and most receive mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). However, MMF is teratogenic, and needs to be switched to a pregnancy-compatible drug before conception. Best practice guidelines strongly recommend azathioprine (AZA) as the immunosuppressive of choice in SLE pregnancy, but do not provide guidance on pharmacogenetic testing [for thiopurine methyltransferase (TMPT) and nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) genes] and drug monitoring. Recent evidence suggests that 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) metabolite monitoring in SLE women during preconception and/or gestation might provide key opportunities to personalize therapy during this critical time (e.g. identification of “shunting”, non-adherence, sub/supra-therapeutic dosing). We evaluated practice patterns pertaining to SLE women with LN in the preconception and gestational periods, with a focus on pharmacogenetic testing and drug monitoring.

Methods: In February 2022, we distributed an electronic survey via REDCap to 39 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) members affiliated with SLE referral centres (https://sliccgroup.org), with reminders after 2 and 6 weeks. Physicians were queried about number of LN patients seen for pregnancy planning in the preceding year, the wait time they recommend prior to conception after renal response, choice of pregnancy-compatible immunosuppressive when switching from MMF, pharmacogenetic testing prior to AZA initiation, and drug monitoring.

Results: We received 29 responses (rate 74%) from SLICC members in North America (52%), Europe (34%), Asia/Oceania (10%), and South America (3%). Mean number of LN patients seen in the prior 12 months for preconception counselling was 7.2 (standard deviation 6.6). Most (93%) recommended waiting for a minimal time after achieving renal response on MMF prior to transitioning to a pregnancy-compatible immunosuppressive, with 19% ≤6 months, 44% suggesting 6-11 months, and 30% 12-23 months. In patients with inactive LN for ≥2 years, most (86%) systematically switched MMF to a pregnancy-compatible drug prior to conception, while 14% discontinued MMF without substituting another drug. When transitioning MMF to a pregnancy-compatible drug, the first choice was AZA (90%). When AZA could not be used, tacrolimus (TAC) was preferred (over cyclosporine, CsA) by 96%. When initiating AZA, 38% never assessed the TPMT genotype and/or phenotype and the vast majority (97%) never tested for the NUDT15 gene. When switching MMF to AZA prior to conception, only 14% measured 6-MP levels. The majority (56%) faced barriers to 6-MP testing related to access, cost, and wait times. When caring for pregnant patients on TAC or CsA, 48% performed drug monitoring each trimester, while 44% never did.

Conclusion: Although pharmacogenetic testing and drug monitoring offer opportunities to personalize therapies for patients with LN prior to conception and/or during pregnancy, our findings showed low use of these strategies among physicians caring for SLE patients. Interestingly, the optimal waiting period prior to conception after LN lacks consensus. We identified potential care gaps, which could be addressed by future pragmatic trials.


Disclosures: J. Lee, None; A. Mendel, None; A. Askanase, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Aurinia, Amgen, Pfizer, Idorsia, Eli Lilly, UCB, AbbVie/Abbott, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS); S. Bae, None; J. Buyon, None; A. Clarke, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), GlaxoSmithKline (GSK); N. Costedoat-Chalumeau, UCB, Roche; P. Fortin, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK); D. Gladman, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Galapagos, UCB Pharma, Celgene; J. Hanly, None; M. Inanc, None; D. Isenberg, Merck/MSD, astra zeneca, Eli Lilly, Servier, Amgen; A. Mak, None; M. Mosca, None; M. Petri, Exagen, AstraZeneca, Alexion, Amgen, AnaptysBio, Argenx, Aurinia, Biogen, Caribou Biosciences, CVS Health, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, Emergent Biosolutions, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), IQVIA, Janssen, Kira Pharmaceuticals, MedShr, Sanofi, SinoMab, Thermofisher, BPR Scientific Advisory Committee; A. Rahman, None; R. Ramsey-Goldman, None; J. Sanchez-Guerrero, None; M. Urowitz, None; D. Wallace, None; S. Bernatsky, None; E. Vinet, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lee J, Mendel A, Askanase A, Bae S, Buyon J, Clarke A, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Fortin P, Gladman D, Hanly J, Inanc M, Isenberg D, Mak A, Mosca M, Petri M, Rahman A, Ramsey-Goldman R, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Urowitz M, Wallace D, Bernatsky S, Vinet E. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Women with Lupus Nephritis in Pregnancy Therapeutic CHallenge (SWITCH): The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systemic-lupus-erythematosus-women-with-lupus-nephritis-in-pregnancy-therapeutic-challenge-switch-the-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinics-experience/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systemic-lupus-erythematosus-women-with-lupus-nephritis-in-pregnancy-therapeutic-challenge-switch-the-systemic-lupus-international-collaborating-clinics-experience/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology