ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3265

Sustaining Employment with Arthritis: Can Existing Workplace Policies and Accommodations Make a Difference?

Monique A.M. Gignac1,2, Elizabeth M. Badley3, Dorcas Beaton4, Vicki Kristman5, Cameron Mustard6, Peter Smith6 and Selahadin Ibrahim6, 1Instititue for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Lakehead University, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: accommodation, Employment, inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis and psychosocial factors

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Title: ARHP VI: Physical Function and Disability

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Despite improved treatment, many individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and osteoarthritis (OA) report difficulties working, reduced productivity and elevated absenteeism. Lacking is research on workplace policies and whether they are associated with better health and employment outcomes. This research: 1) examined the availability, need and use of diverse workplace policies, comparing those with arthritis to healthy controls; and 2) contrasted health and work outcomes of participants who reported accommodation needs were unmet to those whose needs were met or whose needs were exceeded (i.e., used more accommodations than needed).

Methods: Participants had osteoarthritis (OA) or inflammatory arthritis (IA) or no disabling health conditions. They were recruited from a national panel of 80,000 Canadians. Invitations were sent to a sub-sample of individuals aged ≥ 50 yrs to reach a quota of 500 arthritis and 500 healthy respondents. Eligibility included current employment; absence of disabling conditions other than arthritis; and fluency in English/French. A cross-sectional survey was administered on-line or by telephone and assessed demographic (age, gender, education); health (pain, fatigue, workplace activity limitations); work context (job sector, hours, physical work); workplace practices (health benefits, flexible hours, special equipment/adaptations, modified duties, altered work schedules, work-at-home arrangements) and job outcomes (absenteeism, productivity loss, job disruptions). Descriptive statistics and analyses of variance compared groups.

Results: There was a 59% response rate to study invitations and final sample of 631 participants with arthritis (OA>70%; women=53.6%) and 538 with no disabling conditions (healthy controls, 44% women). Groups were similar in demographics, work context and availability of policies to manage work and health. Those with arthritis reported significantly poorer health (pain, fatigue, workplace activity limitations). Yet, there were few differences in their reports of needing or using workplace policies compared to healthy controls. Exceptions were that more individuals with arthritis reported needing and using modified job duties and needing special equipment/adaptations. Comparing the groups revealed similar associations of policy use and job outcomes. Healthy controls and those with arthritis who had unmet accommodation needs reported greater work stress, health variability, productivity loss and job disruptions. Unmet need in those with arthritis also was related to greater fatigue and workplace activity limitations. Respondents whose needs were exceeded had the lowest levels of fatigue, activity limitations, productivity loss and job disruptions.

Conclusion: Despite poorer health, respondents with arthritis often did not take advantage of available workplace policies. Yet using accommodations, even when not needed, was associated with better health and work outcomes. These results need to be replicated with longitudinal data. However, they point to potential benefits of more proactive use of work policies to manage arthritis and employment.


Disclosure: M. A. M. Gignac, None; E. M. Badley, None; D. Beaton, None; V. Kristman, None; C. Mustard, None; P. Smith, None; S. Ibrahim, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gignac MAM, Badley EM, Beaton D, Kristman V, Mustard C, Smith P, Ibrahim S. Sustaining Employment with Arthritis: Can Existing Workplace Policies and Accommodations Make a Difference? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sustaining-employment-with-arthritis-can-existing-workplace-policies-and-accommodations-make-a-difference/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sustaining-employment-with-arthritis-can-existing-workplace-policies-and-accommodations-make-a-difference/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology