ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2490

Sustained Clinical Response in Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with a Low-Dose Rituximab Retreatment Regimen. a Single Center Experience

Sebastian C Rodriguez-Garcia, Raul Castellanos-Moreira Sr., M. Victoria Hernández, Andrea Cuervo, Virginia Ruiz-Esquide, Julio Ramírez, Juan Cañete and Raimon Sanmartí, Rheumatology Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: monoclonal antibodies, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), rituximab and therapy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster III: Efficacy and Safety of Originator Biologics and Biosimilars

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: : The standard dose of rituximab (RTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is two intravenous (iv) 1 g infusions, separated by two weeks. Recently, the efficacy of a low-dose of RTX for retreatment in RA patients has been reported (1). Our aim is to assess the long-term sustained effectiveness of a low-dose of RTX in daily clinical practice.

Methods: Observational retrospective study in a tertiary hospital. We included all RA patients that have received at least one cycle of RTX, at a standard dose, between May 2006 and May 2017. We selected those patients who achieved a good or moderate EULAR response, and thereafter were down-titrated to a low-dose regimen (1 g), according to clinical judgment. Variables analyzed: age, sex, duration of RA, presence of ACPA (antiCCP2) and rheumatoid factor (RF), use and dosage of glucocorticoids (GC) and synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) before and after RTX treatment, number of biologic DMARD (bDMARD) used prior to initiate RTX. Disease activity was measured using the DAS28-ESR index (at baseline, at initiation and during the low-dose RTX period, and at the last follow-up visit).

Results: From 2006 until 2017, 53 RA patients received, at least, one cycle of 2g RTX. Thirty-seven patients (69.8%) achieved a good or moderate EULAR response (mean initial pre-RTX DAS-28: 5.79 ± 1.17) and were step-down to a low dose re-treatment regimen. Baseline characteristics of patients receiving low-dose RTX: mean age 56.4 ± 10.9 years; 13.5% male, mean disease duration 12.7 ± 9.8 years, 91.9% RF + and 97.3 % ACPA +; mean pre-low dose RTX DAS-28: 4.08 ± 1.39. Thirty-four patients (91.9%) were on cs-DMARDs (51.4% with methotrexate (MTX) and 37.8% with leflunomide (LEF)), and 32 (86.5%) received concomitant GC. RTX was the first biologic only in 10 patients (27%). In the remaining cases, the mean number of previous b-DMARDs was 2.52 ± 1.5. Twenty-seven patients (73%) received only one standard cycle (2g) before RTX dose reduction.

A statistically significant reduction in the mean DAS-28 was observed between the first visit on 1g RTX (4.08 ± 1.39) with the last follow-up visit (3.04 ± 0.95; p< 0.0001), as well as, with the mean DAS-28 during the low-dose RTX period (3.63 ± 0.92; p<0.006).

11 were able to reduce dosage (8 MTX, 3 LEF), with a significant reduction for MTX (16.5 ± 4.4 mg vs. 11.92 ± 8.0 mg; p<0.01). From the 32 patients initially receiving GC, 18 (56.3%) were able to reduce dose (9.36 ± 5.06 vs 4.80 ± 4.04; p< 0.0001), and 9 (28%) discontinued GC therapy.

After a follow-up of 3 ± 1.8 years, only 10 (25%) patients have withdrawn RTX. Reasons were: recurrent infections in 4 cases (11%), loss of efficacy in 2 cases (5.6%), and adverse event and patient preferences in one case, respectively.

Conclusion: A sustained clinical response was observed with the 1 gr retreatment of RTX over a long term period.

Reference:

1. Mariette X et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 1508-14.


Disclosure: S. C. Rodriguez-Garcia, None; R. Castellanos-Moreira Sr., None; M. V. Hernández, None; A. Cuervo, None; V. Ruiz-Esquide, None; J. Ramírez, Gebro, 2; J. Cañete, None; R. Sanmartí, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rodriguez-Garcia SC, Castellanos-Moreira R Sr., Hernández MV, Cuervo A, Ruiz-Esquide V, Ramírez J, Cañete J, Sanmartí R. Sustained Clinical Response in Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with a Low-Dose Rituximab Retreatment Regimen. a Single Center Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sustained-clinical-response-in-refractory-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-with-a-low-dose-rituximab-retreatment-regimen-a-single-center-experience/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sustained-clinical-response-in-refractory-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-with-a-low-dose-rituximab-retreatment-regimen-a-single-center-experience/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology