ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0105

Supplemental Primary Dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Immunosuppressed Patients on DMARDs and Biologic Agents

Archanaa Murugan1, Ximena Ruiz2 and Leslie Harris Jr.1, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham- Internal Medicine- Montgomery, Montgomery, AL, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Montgomery, AL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biologicals, COVID-19, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), education, patient, socioeconomic factors

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Immunosuppressive states can attenuate the immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccines. Some studies have shown an improved immune response with a supplemental primary dose. In August 2021, the CDC recommended that immunocompromised individuals (including patients on immunosuppressive agents) receive a supplemental primary dose of the vaccine ≥28 days after their second dose of the Pfizer BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. The American College of Rheumatology Covid-19 vaccine task force strongly supports these recommendations, as well as a supplemental dose of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. This study aims to determine how many patients on immunosuppressive Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and biologic agents have received a supplemental dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in a resource-limited population in rural southeast United States of America. We aim to determine underlying barriers to obtaining adequate vaccination.

Methods: This retrospective chart review and questionnaire included patients seen in our rheumatology and internal medicine clinic from November 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022. Patients included in the study were on any of the following medications; Methotrexate, Mycophenolate, Azathioprine, Leflunomide, Etanercept, Adalimumab, Certolizumab, Golimumab, Tocilizumab, Abatacept, Rituximab, and Infliximab, from at least July 1, 2021 to the time of study. Demographics, diagnosis, and COVID-19 vaccination status were collected from patient records. Then a short telephone questionnaire was administered. Descriptive analysis including Chi-square test and Fishers exact test were used.

Results: A total of 204 patients were included. Twenty eight patients (13.7%) received a supplemental dose and 176 (86.3%) did not. Of those 176 patients, 94 (53.4%) did not know about this recommendation, 52 (29.5%) had safety concerns or felt that they did not have enough information, and 30 (17%) patients had other reasons including prior adverse effects, religious exemption, or belief that it is not needed. Out of the total subjects, 55 (27 %) were unvaccinated while 121 (59.3%) received partial vaccination and 107 (52.4%) received the booster vaccine. There was no association of supplemental vaccination rate to age, gender, vaccine type, diagnosis, or medication. White patients were more likely to have received the supplemental primary dose (p= 0.019) compared to other races.

Conclusion: This study reveals that most immunosuppressed patients with autoimmune conditions in our resource-limited rural population have not received the supplemental primary dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The most common reason was lack of knowledge of vaccine recommendations. This could be due to frequent guideline changes, patient education, and even healthcare provider education. Most patients with safety concerns did not receive any doses. Other reasons included adverse reactions, religious exemption, and belief that COVID-19 is not a threat. There could be similar patterns in other comparable populations. It is important to educate providers and patients about appropriate vaccination regimen, as the immunosuppressed are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and its most severe complications.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Patient Characteristics and the Supplemental Primary Dose

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Reasons for Not Receiving the Supplemental Primary Dose

Supporting image 3

Graph 1. Reasons for Not Receiving the Supplemental Primary Dose


Disclosures: A. Murugan, None; X. Ruiz, None; L. Harris Jr., None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Murugan A, Ruiz X, Harris Jr. L. Supplemental Primary Dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Immunosuppressed Patients on DMARDs and Biologic Agents [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/supplemental-primary-dose-of-the-covid-19-vaccine-in-immunosuppressed-patients-on-dmards-and-biologic-agents/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/supplemental-primary-dose-of-the-covid-19-vaccine-in-immunosuppressed-patients-on-dmards-and-biologic-agents/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology