ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2511

Superior SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response Achieved in Rituximab-treated Patients When Vaccinated Against COVID-19 Before Compared to After Rituximab Initiation – Guidance for Future Vaccination Strategies

Christian Ammitzbøll1, Marianne Kragh Thomsen2, Lars Erik Bartels1, Marie-Louise From Hermansen1, Mathias Hänel3, Rasmus Klose-Jensen1, Mads Christian Lamm Larsen1, Cecile Bo Hansen4, Morgan Oliver Lauritsen1, Susan Mikkelsen5, Clara Mistegaard1, Morten Aagaard Nielsen1, Esben Naeser1, Janne Bille Mønster Olesen5, Peter Garred4, Christian Erikstrup5, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge6 and Anne Troldborg6, 1Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 2Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 3Rheumatollogy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 4Clinical Immunology, sect. 7631, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 6Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, B-Cell Targets, COVID-19

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Immunological Complications of Medical Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-5:30PM

Background/Purpose: Rituximab (RTX) treatment significantly decreases the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines, raising concerns about its use. However, unlike during the pandemic, most patients initiating RTX now, will receive COVID-19 vaccination before initiating RTX. Thus, the effect of RTX treatment on serological vaccine response in pre-vaccinated individuals remains unclear. We aimed to assess the antibody (abs) level and function by three different SARS-CoV-2 abs assays in COVID-19 vaccinated patients, depending on the timing of RTX treatment initiation, either before or after vaccination.

Methods: Patients treated with RTX at the Dep. of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, from 2017 to 2022 were eligible for inclusion (n=368). Patients were categorized based on the order of RTX treatment to their primary COVID-19 vaccination: RTX pre (RTX only prior to vaccination), RTX pre+post (RTX prior to and after vaccination), and RTX post (RTX only after vaccination). Additionally, we investigated the effect of vaccines administered ≥ 9 months since the last RTX treatment, “RTX-free” vaccinations. Serological response was evaluated by measuring 2 different SARS-CoV-2-IgGs (Spike and Nucleocapsid) and the concentration and activity of neutralizing antibodies. Blood donors (BDs) were enrolled as controls, n=113.

Results: We included 254 patients; 67% female, aged 62 years. The predominant diagnoses were ANCA-vasculitis (31%), rheumatoid arthritis (26%) and myositis (12%). Patients had on average four COVID-19 vaccinations and one infection, while BDs had respectively three and one.

The RTX pre+post group (n=132) had significantly lower concentrations of spike and neutralizing abs, neutralizing activity and seroconversion compared to the RTX pre (n=54) and RTX postgroup(n=68), Fig 1A-D. Only 65% of RTX pre+postdeveloped neutralizing abs compared to 91% for theRTX post and 93% for theRTX pre, Fig 1C. There was no difference between the RTX pre or RTX post in seroconversion of the 3 abs measured (all p’s ≥ 0.08).

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed with seroconversion of SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG as the dependent variable, Table 1. The final model had number of “RTX-free” vaccinations (OR 1.93) and number of RTX infusions (OR 0.94) as the significant predictors.

There was a significant dose-dependent correlation between “RTX-free” vaccinations with both antibody concentrations and seroconversion (Fig 2A, P< 0.001). The patients with zero “RTX-free” vaccinations had a seroconversion rate of 50%, compared to 89% for patients with 3 “RTX-free” vaccinations and40-fold higher median ab levels.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that COVID-19 vaccination administered before initiating RTX will induce a superior serological response compared to vaccination after RTX treatment. This supports the continuous use of RTX in rheumatic diseases with an emphasis on administering vaccinations before initiating RTX. Additionally, our findings highlight the importance of timing vaccinations for individuals undergoing continuous RTX treatment. The concept of “RTX-free” vaccinations with a minimum gap of 9 months since last RTX treatment may be useful in guiding vaccination strategies.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Concentrations of IgG (A), nucleocapside (B) and neutralizing (C) SARS-CoV_2 antibodies and neutralizing antibody activity (D) in Rituximab (RTX) treated patients and blood donors. RTX treated patients are divided according to sequence of primary COVID_19 vaccination and RTX treatment. ”RTX pre” indicate RTX treatment were only given prior to vaccination, and not after. ”RTX pre+post” RTX treatment were given prior to and after vaccination. ”RTX post” RTX treatment were only given after primary COVID_19 vaccination. Pie charts indicate percentage of patients with measurabel antibodies/positive neutralizing antibody activity. Horizontal line indicate mean and whiskers 95% CI. Dotted lines indicate levels for positive test.

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Graphical presentation of variables with explanatory power in multiple logistic regression analysis with precense of SARS-CoV_2 IgG antibodies as dependent variable. (A) Number of vaccinations with sufficient interval to latest RTX infusion, “RTX-free”, e.g. no RTX given 9 months prior to and 1 month after COVID_19 vaccination. Bar indicate median, whiskers 95% CI, N total number of patients in each group (B) Total number of RTX infusions recieved.


Disclosures: C. Ammitzbøll: None; M. Thomsen: None; L. Bartels: None; M. Hermansen: None; M. Hänel: None; R. Klose-Jensen: None; M. Larsen: None; C. Hansen: None; M. Lauritsen: None; S. Mikkelsen: None; C. Mistegaard: None; M. Nielsen: None; E. Naeser: None; J. Olesen: None; P. Garred: None; C. Erikstrup: None; E. Hauge: None; A. Troldborg: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ammitzbøll C, Thomsen M, Bartels L, Hermansen M, Hänel M, Klose-Jensen R, Larsen M, Hansen C, Lauritsen M, Mikkelsen S, Mistegaard C, Nielsen M, Naeser E, Olesen J, Garred P, Erikstrup C, Hauge E, Troldborg A. Superior SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response Achieved in Rituximab-treated Patients When Vaccinated Against COVID-19 Before Compared to After Rituximab Initiation – Guidance for Future Vaccination Strategies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/superior-sars-cov-2-antibody-response-achieved-in-rituximab-treated-patients-when-vaccinated-against-covid-19-before-compared-to-after-rituximab-initiation-guidance-for-future-vaccination-st/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/superior-sars-cov-2-antibody-response-achieved-in-rituximab-treated-patients-when-vaccinated-against-covid-19-before-compared-to-after-rituximab-initiation-guidance-for-future-vaccination-st/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology