ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0272

Superior Discrimination Between LLDAS and DORIS Remission with Modification of Prednisolone Dose Threshold

Eric Morand1, Vera Golder2, Worawit Louthrenoo3, Shue Fen Luo4, Yeong-Jian Wu5, Aisha Lateef6, Sargunan Sockalingam7, Sandra Navarra8, Leonid Zamora9, Laniyati Hamijoyo10, Yasuhiro Katsumata11, Masayoshi Harigai12, Madelynn Chan13, Sean O'Neill14, Fiona Goldblatt15, Yi-Hsing Chen16, Yanjie Hao17, Zhuoli Zhang17, Jun Kikuchi18, Tsutomu Takeuchi19, Chak Sing Lau20, Zhanguo Li21, Alberta Hoi22, Mandana Nikpour23 and Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake2, 1Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 2Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3Chiang Mai University Hospital, Muang, Thailand, 4Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, Taoyuan, Taipei, Taiwan (Republic of China), 5Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Guishan, Taiwan (Republic of China), 6National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, 7University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 8University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines, 9University of Santo Thomas, Manila, Philippines, 10University of Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, 11Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 12Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 13Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, 14Sydney University, Sydney, Australia, 15Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 16Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan (Republic of China), 17Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China (People's Republic), 18Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 19Division of Rheumatology, Department of internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan, 20Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 21Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China (People's Republic), 22Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 23The University of Melbourne at St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: longitudinal studies, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Clinical Manifestations

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Treat-to-target (T2T) approaches to rheumatic disease require the definition and validation of low disease activity and remission endpoints that should be concentrically more stringent. The Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) has been established as a low-disease activity endpoint for SLE, but multiple possible definitions for remission arise from the Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) framework. LLDAS and all remission definitions are associated with improved long term outcomes in terms of damage accrual and flare, but previous analyses suggested that Clinical Remission on Treatment (CROT) allowing 5mg/day prednisolone was insufficiently different from LLDAS (≤7.5 mg/day) to be used separately.  Therefore, we examined a more stringent threshold, requiring daily prednisolone < 5mg (CROT< 5), a dose which requires physician and patient to change from standard 5 mg tablets.

Methods: Data from a prospective multinational cohort study of patients with SLE (ACR or SLICC criteria) undertaken in 17 centres between 2013-2017 were used. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare LLDAS and DORIS definitions of remission in terms of impact on flares (SELENA flare index) and organ damage (SLICC damage index (SDI)). LLDAS and DORIS CROT were defined as described in Golder et al, 2019: CROT requires clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0 and physician global assessment (PGA) (0-3) < 0.5; CROT allows prednisolone ≤5 mg/day; whereas CROT< 5 excludes patients taking 5mg/day. LLDAS allows SLEDAI-2K ≤4 with no new/major organ activity, PGA ≤1, and prednisolone ≤7.5 mg.

Results:

18.659 visits of 2,384 patients collected over a mean (SD) 2.26 (1.34) years were analysed. LLDAS was attained in 8,883 (47.6%) visits, CROT in 6,521 (35.0%) and CROT< 5 in 4,373 (23.4%; mean (SD) daily prednisolone 1.16 (1.32) mg)), confirming that lowering the prednisolone threshold resulted in a more stringent remission definition compared to CROT. LLDAS was protective from flare and damage accrual whether assessed visit by visit or cumulatively using a 50% of time exposed threshold. Visit by visit analysis revealed that CROT< 5 was associated with slightly greater protection from future flare (HR (95% CI) 0.48 (0.42,0.54)) than CROT (HR 0.54 (0.49,0.60)). Similarly, future damage risk was slightly less with CROT< 5 (HR 0.60 (0.47,0.78)) than CROT (0.62 (0.50,0.78)). When measured cumulatively using a 50% of time exposed threshold, CROT < 5 was more protective from flare (HR 0.40 (0.35,0.46)) than CROT (0.45 (0.40,0.50)) but not from damage. The effect of cumulative LLDAS on damage accrual overtime remained significant after excluding patients in CROT< 5 (HR 0.74 (0.57,0.96), p=0.022) but not after excluding CROT. Cumulative LLDAS was independently associated with flare excluding either CROT or CROT< 5.

Conclusion: A remission definition requiring a ceiling dose of prednisolone less than 5 mg (CROT< 5) is more stringent than CROT (allowing 5 mg/day) and its effects are independent of LLDAS, while CROT is insufficiently distinct from LLDAS. Confirmation in other cohorts should be undertaken prior to agreeing on a definition of remission for SLE.  


Disclosure: E. Morand, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Merck Serono, 2, 5, Neovacs, 5, Sandoz, 5, Novartis, 8, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Biogen, 5; V. Golder, None; W. Louthrenoo, None; S. Luo, None; Y. Wu, None; A. Lateef, None; S. Sockalingam, None; S. Navarra, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Astra-Zeneca, 5, 8, Astellas, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8, Biogen, 2, 5; L. Zamora, None; L. Hamijoyo, None; Y. Katsumata, None; M. Harigai, AbbVie Japan GK, 1, 2, Asahi Kasei Corp., 1, Astellas Pharma Inc., 1, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 1, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd, 1, 2, 3, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 1, 2, Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc., 1, Eisai Pharmaceutical, 1, 2, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., 1, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., 1, Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 1, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 1, 2, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, 1, Pfizer Japan Inc, 1, AbbVie, 1; M. Chan, None; S. O'Neill, None; F. Goldblatt, None; Y. Chen, None; Y. Hao, None; Z. Zhang, None; J. Kikuchi, None; T. Takeuchi, Astellas Pharma Inc., 2, 5, 8, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited, 2, 5, 8, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie GK., 2, 5, 8, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, 2, 5, 8, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 2, 5, 8, Eisai Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8, Eli Lily Japan K.K, 2, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Japan, Inc., 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, 5, 8, Novartis Pharma K.K., 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Dainippon Sumitomo Co., 2, 5, 8, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8; C. Lau, None; Z. Li, None; A. Hoi, None; M. Nikpour, Actelion, 2, 5, 8, GSK, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5; R. Kandane-Rathnayake, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Morand E, Golder V, Louthrenoo W, Luo S, Wu Y, Lateef A, Sockalingam S, Navarra S, Zamora L, Hamijoyo L, Katsumata Y, Harigai M, Chan M, O'Neill S, Goldblatt F, Chen Y, Hao Y, Zhang Z, Kikuchi J, Takeuchi T, Lau C, Li Z, Hoi A, Nikpour M, Kandane-Rathnayake R. Superior Discrimination Between LLDAS and DORIS Remission with Modification of Prednisolone Dose Threshold [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/superior-discrimination-between-lldas-and-doris-remission-with-modification-of-prednisolone-dose-threshold/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/superior-discrimination-between-lldas-and-doris-remission-with-modification-of-prednisolone-dose-threshold/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology