ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0090

Subcutaneous Sarilumab in Hospitalized Patients with Moderate-severe COVID-19 Infection Compared to the Standard Care: An Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial

Sebastián C Rodriguez-García1, Isidoro Gonzalez-Alvaro1, Francisco Abad-Santos2, Azucena Bautista-Hernández3, Lucio García-Fraile3, Juan Pablo Baldivieso-Achá4, Jesús Sanz-Sanz3 and Rosario Garcia de Vicuña1, 1Rheumatology Service. La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 2Clinical Pharmacology Service. Clinical Research and Clinical Trials Unit. La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 3Division of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Service. La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 4Rheumatology Department. La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Biologicals, COVID-19, Inflammation, Mortality, Sarilumab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Epidemiology & Public Health Poster I: COVID-19 & Vaccination (0084–0117)

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Many uncertainties remain for IL-6 blockers on the management of COVID-19 such as the optimal time of intervention, the schedule of administration and predictors of response. To date, data on the use of subcutaneous sarilumab (SAR) is scarce and no randomized controlled trial (RCT) results are available. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating the effect of subcutaneous SAR vs standard of care (SOC) in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

Methods: Single center open-label RCT. We included admitted adult patients with documented COVID-19 infection with pneumonia confirmed by chest imaging, laboratory evidence of inflammatory phenotype and no need for invasive ventilation. Patients were randomized from March 14th to October 30th 2020, to receive SAR or SOC in a 2:1 proportion. The experimental arm received a single 400 mg dose of SAR in two 200 mg subcutaneous injections added to SOC. The control arm received usual supportive care as per local protocols.

The primary endpoints included 30-day mortality, mean change in clinical status at day 7 on an ordinal scale ranging from death (category1) to discharged (category 7), and duration of hospitalization. The primary efficacy analysis was conducted on the intention to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included time to became afebrile for 48 hours without antipyretics, mean change in the mentioned ordinal scale at day 14, progression to non- invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), time to oxygen supply independency, and adverse events (AE). To estimate the intervention effect size, hazard ratios (HR) were estimated when feasible.

Results: Thirty out of sixty-five screened patients underwent randomization: 20 to SAR and 10 to SOC. Most patients were male (20/30, 67%) with a median (interquartile range, IQR) age of 61.5 (56-72) (Table 1).

At day 30, 2/20 patients died in the SAR and none in the SOC arm (Log HR 15.11, SD 22.64, p 0.54). At day 7, no significant differences were seen in the median change on a 7-category ordinal scale (2 [0-3] vs 3 [0-3], p 0.32) (Figure 1). The median days to discharge were similar (7 [6-11] vs 6 [4-12]; HR 0.65, SD 0.26; p 0.27). No significant differences were seen for any of the secondary outcomes. In the SAR arm, 4/20 (20%) and 3/20 (15%) patients required NIMV and IMV respectively vs none in the SOC (Table 2). Regarding safety, the rate of AE of special interest were similar in the SAR (50%) and SOC (40%) arms.

Conclusion: In our study, subcutaneous SAR added to SOC showed no additional benefit in 30-day mortality, clinical status at day 7, or hospital stay.

Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population
AST: Aspartate amino-transferase; ALT: Alanine amino- transferase; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRP: C-reactive protein; GGT: Gamma-glutamyl transferase; IL-6: Interleukin-6; LDH: Lactate Dehydrogenase; NIV: noninvasive ventilation; PaO2/Fi02: partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen; PCT: Procalcitonin. a) O2 flow ≤ 15l/min e.g. by face mask, nasal cannula (NC); b) O2 flow >15l/min, e.g. by face mask, ‘High Flow’ devices (e.g. HFNC), CPAP or NIV including BiPAP and other devices; c) Corticosteroids:  30 mg Prednisone/d or equivalent; intravenous bolus of 6-Metilprednisolone 120_125 mg/d, except 1 patient 80 mg/d; d) All radiologic exams were assessed and reported by radiologists with pneumological expertise

Table 2. Primary and secondary outcomes
IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; NIMV: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation; SD: standard deviation; SOC: Standard of care. a) Accounting for survival status by treating patients who died as having a 30-day hospital stay; b) Eleven patients in the SAR arm and 5 in the SOC arm were febrile at randomization

Figure 1. Evolution of clinical status in COVID_19 patients from baseline to day 14 according to the 7-category ordinal scale. Data are shown as the percentage of patients at each ordinal point


Disclosures: S. Rodriguez-García, None; I. Gonzalez-Alvaro, None; F. Abad-Santos, None; A. Bautista-Hernández, None; L. García-Fraile, None; J. Baldivieso-Achá, None; J. Sanz-Sanz, None; R. Garcia de Vicuña, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rodriguez-García S, Gonzalez-Alvaro I, Abad-Santos F, Bautista-Hernández A, García-Fraile L, Baldivieso-Achá J, Sanz-Sanz J, Garcia de Vicuña R. Subcutaneous Sarilumab in Hospitalized Patients with Moderate-severe COVID-19 Infection Compared to the Standard Care: An Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/subcutaneous-sarilumab-in-hospitalized-patients-with-moderate-severe-covid-19-infection-compared-to-the-standard-care-an-open-label-randomized-clinical-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/subcutaneous-sarilumab-in-hospitalized-patients-with-moderate-severe-covid-19-infection-compared-to-the-standard-care-an-open-label-randomized-clinical-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology