ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2572

Study of Two Biomarkers of Biological Age in the Blood of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Laura Vidal-Bralo1, Eva Pérez-Pampin1, Rosana Varela1, Juan J Gomez-Reino1, Steve Horvath2 and Antonio Gonzalez1, 1Instituto Investigacion Sanitaria-Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Aging, methylation and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Telomeres

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Human Etiology and Pathogenesis - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Accelerated biological aging of blood cells could contribute to the pathogenesis of RA. However, biological age has multiple facets, some as epigenetic aging not yet addressed in RA, and the most studied, shortened telomere length, not replicated in all studies. Recently, DNA methylation age measures (DmAM) have been developed as biomarkers of epigenetic aging that correlate with survival, diseases of old age and fitness in the elderly. We aimed to address biological aging in RA with DmAM and telomere length.

Methods: DNA from blood of 365 patients meeting ACR classification criteria for RA and 375 healthy age-matched controls were analyzed. A DmAM based in 8 CpG sites was assayed by minisequencing after bisulfite modification (1). qPCR was used for evaluation of relative telomere length (2). A second set of 354 ACPA positive RA patients and 335 controls was used for replication of the DmAM results (3). Differences in DmAM and telomere length between patients and controls were evaluated with ANOVA. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for survival analysis. All analyses were adjusted for age and sex.

Results: The 8 CpG DmAM showed a small premature aging in patients with RA in comparison with controls in the two sample collections analyzed (Table 1). However, premature aging did not persist after correction for changes in blood cell subpopulations (Table 1), and it was not consistently observed with other DmAM (Table 1). In addition, telomere length attrition was not observed in RA patients (Table 1). No association was observed between any of the two age biomarkers and time since disease onset, antibody status, and prevalence of erosions, shared epitope or smoking (not shown). At the end of data collection, 246 of 734 subjects have died (33.51%). Hazard Ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was higher for RA patients than for controls (HR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.45; P = 2.0 x 10-6). However, mortality was not associated with age biomarkers, neither the DmAM, nor telomere length, after adjusting for chronological age.

Conclusion: We observed premature epigenetic aging of small magnitude in blood cells of patients with RA, but the difference is most likely irrelevant as it could be due to changes in blood cell subpopulations or to particularities of the specific DmAM. In addition, we did not observe the reported shortening of telomere length, further questioning the concept of premature biological aging in RA blood cells as a whole. Table 1. Differences in biological age

Sample set

ΔDmAM (years)

95 % CI

P

Telomere length (T/S)

95 % CI

P

1st

1.9

1.1 to 2.7

1.0 x 10-6

-0.05

-0.1 to -0.01

0.02

2nd

0.7

0.2 to 1.3

0.005

NA

2nd adj*

-0.6

-1.2 to -0.1

0.03

2ndalt**

-1.5

-2.2 to -0.7

7.0 x 10-5

* Adjusted for blood cell composition according to Houseman et al. BMC Bioinformatics 13:86 (2012). ** Alternative DmAM from Horvath, S. Genome Biology14:R115 (2013) References: 1. Vidal-Bralo, L. Submitted 2. Cawthon, R. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e47 (2002) 3. Liu, Y. et al. Nat Biotechnol 31,142–147 (2013) Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spain) with participation of the European Regional Development Fund of the EU (grants PI14/01651 and RD12/009/008)


Disclosure: L. Vidal-Bralo, None; E. Pérez-Pampin, None; R. Varela, None; J. J. Gomez-Reino, Roche, Schering-Plough, 2,BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, 5; S. Horvath, None; A. Gonzalez, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vidal-Bralo L, Pérez-Pampin E, Varela R, Gomez-Reino JJ, Horvath S, Gonzalez A. Study of Two Biomarkers of Biological Age in the Blood of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/study-of-two-biomarkers-of-biological-age-in-the-blood-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/study-of-two-biomarkers-of-biological-age-in-the-blood-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology